AN ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS OF TURKEY AND BRICS COUNTRIES
Gako-hitzak:
BRICS, macroeconomics, G6, production costsLaburpena
It is seen that Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, which are the countries that attract attention with the economic developments recently in the world economy. These countries have surpassed the performance of many developed countries' economies and these countries are referred to as BRICS countries in the world economy. The main reason why these countries are referred to as a group is that they must have a young and growing population, have a chance of earning a high growth opportunity because they can earn direct foreign investment in the country economy, cheap labor and consequently low production costs. Judging from the forecasts of the future of the world economy, until the 2050s, BRICS countries will play an active role in the world economy, also known as the G-6, one of the world's largest economies of the United States, Italy, France; it is argued that the nation will have more than one national income than its national income. Made this first part of the BRICS countries and Turkey's economy will be assessed in terms of macroeconomic indicators studies will be compared later with the BRICS countries in that part of Turkey's economic indicators. A general evaluation will be made in the conclusion part.
Erreferentziak
Çakır, M. Y., & Kabundi, A. (2013). Trade shocks from BRIC to South Africa: A global VAR analysis. Economic modelling, 32, 190-202.
Erkan, B. (2012). BRIC Ülkeleri ve Türkiye’nin İhracat Uzmanlaşma ve Rekabet Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. AİBÜ-İİBF Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi.
Karakurt, B. (2016). Küresel Krizin Etkilerini Azaltmada Mali Yönetişimin Rolü: BRICS Ülkeleri Örneği, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(2).
Nistor, P. (2015). FDI Implications on BRICS Economy Growth. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 981-985.
O’neill, J. (2001), Building Better Global Economic BRICs, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics, 66, p:1-16.
Oropeza García, A. (2014). The Role of China and the BRICS Project. Mexican law review, 7(1), 109-136.
Özcan, S. E., & Açıkalın, S. (2015). Relationship between Misery Index and Lottery Games: The Case of Turkey. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(7), 1.
Özsoylu, A. F., & Algan, N. (2011). Dünya ekonomisinin yeni aktörleri: BRIC: Brezilya-Rusya-Hindistan-Çin. Karahan Kitabevi.
Shahrokhi, M., Cheng, H., Dandapani, K., Figueiredo, A., Parhizgari, A. M., & Shachmurove, Y. (2017). The evolution and future of the BRICS: Unbundling politics from economics. Global Finance Journal, 32, 1-15.
Web page 1 = http://databank.worldbank.org
Web page 2 = https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.htm
Web page 3 = http://www.heritage.org/index/explore?view=by-variables
Web page 4 = https://tradingeconomics.com/india/unemployment-rate
Argitaratua
Zenbakia
Atala
Lizentzia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


