EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION AND LANGUAGE IMPROVEMENT THROUGH P2P INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS

Authors

  • Paul Gordon Dickinson Senior Lecturer, PhD International Business, Cert (TEFL), Department of Business and Management, Laurea University Finland, Hyvinkaa, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v6i1.3602

Keywords:

language learning, experiential, technology, education, projects

Abstract

In order to meet the needs of employers and to make students more employable Laurea University, Finland has developed an “experiential” educational model through project-based learning in English based around real business projects linking theory studied. The programme is a bachelors degree conducted with international exchange students from many different countries (including Turkey, Germany, Romania, Spain, China, Holland, Mexico, Japan, and Italy) within project teams. English is a second language to these students, but it is not known as to how and if their language develops during the programme. The study considers the “experiential” nature of both the programme and the language from a literature perspective then focusing particularly on the learning of English by the students without any formal teaching classes. The students participated within projects for one semester (via an exchange programme) during an academic period from August 2018 to May 2020. There is a quantitative empirical approach (using a written questionnaire) which was qualitative in nature (including open questions) which related to the assessment of the English language learning experience of 29 international exchange students. Their feedback via answers to written questions forms the basis of the study. Findings reveal that such an approach to language learning can be successful and was positive in the sense of flexibility, relevance and enjoyability as well as the easy access and help of technology. The students generally felt their language level had improved through informal discussions and by use of a language app connected to the project work. Also, some students felt that the “learning by doing” (through the projects) improved their language authenticity and application. However, some students felt their language learning would have further increased by the use of a “weekly relevant noun/adjective list” during the project meetings. The research overall shows that some language improvement can be achieved informally within an “experiential” educational model through project-based learning. Additionally, that can be within one semester and by students from different countries with different educational systems.

Author Biography

  • Paul Gordon Dickinson, Senior Lecturer, PhD International Business, Cert (TEFL), Department of Business and Management, Laurea University Finland, Hyvinkaa, Finland
    Paul Dickinson has been a Senior Lecturer for over 10 years at Laurea University, in the department of Business and Management Hyvinkaa Finland. He has worked on over 120 international projects during this time, and also been an exchange student tutor and English language teacher. He has also conducted culture and business lectures and is particularly interested in SME’s, cross cultural communication and project management.

References

Chakrabarty, S. (2013). Best Split-Half and Maximum Reliability. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 3(1)p1-8.

Choi J., Nunan, D. (2018). Language Learning and Activation In and Beyond the Classroom. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 49-63 (2018). https://journals.castledown-publishers.com/ajal/

Cresswell, J. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches 2014. Sage pub.

Dickinson P. G. (2017). The P2P educational model providing innovative learning by linking technology business and research. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(10) 2017.

Dogoriti E., Pange J., Anderson S. (2014). The use of social networking and learning management systems in English language teaching in higher education. Campus-Wide information systems, vol 31 issue 4 pp 254-263. MCB Emerald pub.

Keengwe, J. (2015). Handbook of Research on Educational Technology Integration and Active Learning p350 IGI Global pub.

Kohonen V. (1996). Experiential language learning :second language learning as cooperative learner education.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Mollei, F., Rhanama, H. (2012). Experiential education contributing to language learning. International journal of humanities and social science vol 2 no 21.

Moore, D. T. (2010) Forms and issues in experiential learning. In D. M. Qualters (Ed.) New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 3-13). New York City, NY: Wiley.

Morris, E., Burkett, K. (2011) Mixed Methodologies: A New Research Paradigm or Enhanced Quantitative Paradigm, Online Journal of Cultural Competence in Nursing Healthcare, 1(1), p27‒36.

Pfenningger, S., & Singleton, D. (2017). Beyond age effects in instructional L2 learning. Bristol UK: Multilingual Matters.

Roschelle, J, Pea, R, Hoadley C, Gordon D, Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technology. Children and computer technology, 10(2), p76.

Sharifi N, Shariati, M. (2017). Using Experiential Learning to Enhance Students' Foreign Language Proficiency. Translation journal July 2017. www.translationjournal.net.

Thatcher, R. (2010) Validity and Reliability of Quantitative Electroencephalography. Journal of Neurotherapy, 14, p122-152.

Tomalin, B. (2013). Cross cultural communication-theory and practice .Palgrave Publishing.

Willis, J. (2007). Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches. Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-27

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).