DEVELOPMENT OF LESSON PLAN INSTRUMENT ON POGIL MODEL FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Autors/ores

  • Putri Anggraini Master Program of Natural Science Teacher, Lambung Mangkurat University Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • B. Badruzsaufari Master Program of Natural Science Teacher, Lambung Mangkurat University Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Uripto Trisno Santoso Master Program of Natural Science Teacher, Lambung Mangkurat University Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Paraules clau:

lesson plan instrument, development research, POGIL, critical thinking skills

Resum

This research is aimed to develop a lesson plan instrument with a POGIL model on validity and practical. The research method used is Tesmer model which covers: 1) self evaluation; 2) expert review; 3) one-to-one; 4) small group; and 5) field test. The lesson plan instrument covers the syllaby, lesson plans, materials, students workbook, observation sheet cognitive, observation sheet critical thinking skills, observation sheet activities of teachers and students, observation sheet response of participants, observation sheet self regulation, and observation sheet psychomotor skills. The research in SMPN 2 Alalak. The results of the study show that: 1) the validity of lesson plan instrument based on experts is category as very valid, the level of readability of the module and students workbook is category as good; 2) the practicality of learning devices based on the implementation of lesson plans instrument is very good.

Referències

Anam, K. 2015. Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri Metode dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Akker, J.V.D., Gravemeijer, K., Mckenney, S., and N. Nieveen. 2006. Educational Design Research. Educational design research seminar organized by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research; Program Council for Educational Research (NWO/PROO): Netherlands.

Bassham, G., Irwin, H., Nardonedan Wallace. 2010. Critical Thinking: A Student Introduction 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill Company, Inc.

Brickman, et al. 2009. Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 3 No. 2 Article 16.

Broadbear, J. 2003. Essential Elements of Lesson Designed to Promote Critical Thinking. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL). Vol. 3(3), pp 1-8.

Costa, L. A. 2001. Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. ASCD. Melbourne. AU.

Dewi, K., Sadia,W.I., and P.N. Ristiati. 2013. Pengembangan Perangkat RPP IPA Terpadu dengan Setting Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan KinerjaIlmiah Siswa. Jurnal Pascasarjana Undiksha (online), 3(1), http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/viewFile/548/340. accessed on April 5, 2018.

Ennis, R.H. 1993. Critical Thinking Assesment. Journal Theory and Practice, Vol.32(2), pp 176-186.

Filsaime, D.K. 2007. Menguak Rahasia Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif. Edisi ke-2 translated by Sunarni. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Raya.

Hanson, D. and Wolfskill, T. 2006. Process Workshops: A New Model For Instruction. Journal of Chemistry Education 77 (2006).

Hosnan. 2014. Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Jaya, I.M. Sadia, I.W. and Arnyana, I.B.P. 2014. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Bermuatan Pendidikan Karakter Dengan Setting Guided Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, Volume 4 Tahun 2014.

Liliasari. 2009. Inovasi Pembelajaran IPA: Mengapa dan Bagaimana? Workshop Paper of International Pendidikan IPA. SPS UPI. Bandung.

Nadziroh, A., Setiadi, I., Fahmi. 2018. The Effect of Inquiry Model On Science Process Skills and Learning Outcomes. European Journal of Education Studies. ISSN: 2501 - 1111. ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111. Vol. 4. Issue. 12. pp. 177-182. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1344846. www.oapub.org/edu

Robbins, S. 2005. The Path to Critical Thinking. Harvard: HBS Working Knowledge.

Simonson and Shadle. 2013. Implementing Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Undergraduate Biomechanics: Lessons Learned by a Novice. Kinesiology Faculty Publications and Presentations: Department of Kinesiology.

Singh, P.J., vickneswary, M., Diwiyah, M. Raidah, H. and A. Rahim. 2017. Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning on critical Thinking Skills of secondary School Students. International Journal of Informative and Futuristic Research. ISSN :2347-1697.

Taherdoost, H. 2016. Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM) 5(3), 2016, pp: 28-36.

Tawil, Muhammad and Bunga Dara Amin. 2013. Portofolio-Based Physics Learning Model To Improve Critical Thinking Skills. International Jurnal of Education and Research 1:5. http://www.ijem.com/journal/September-2013/43.pdf) accessed on 3 April 2018.

Tessmer, M. 1998. Planning and conducting formative evaluations. London: Cogan Page.

Trautmann, N.M., Carlsen, Krasny, and C.M. Cunringham. 2000. Integrated Inquiry. The Science Teacher, 67 (6), pp 52-55.

Warsono and Hariyanto. 2012. Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Yuliani, N.P., Margunayasa, G., Parmiti, D.S. 2017. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran POGIL Berbantuan Peta Pikiran Terhadap Hasil belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SD. Journal of Education Technology, Vol. 1 No. (2): pp. 117-123

Zubaidah, S., S. Mahanal, L. Yuliati, and D. Sigit. 2014. Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam buku Guru. SMP/MTS Kelas VIII. Puskurbuk, Balitbang, Kemendikbud. Jakarta

Descàrregues

Publicat

2018-12-14

Número

Vol 3, No 2 (2018)

Secció

Articles

Llicència

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).