HOW TOMORROW SCIENTISTS VALUE SCIENCE
Paraules clau:
PhD students, research, emotions, ‘elite’, experienceResum
This study tried to investigate PhD students’ experience while conducting research, as regards the reasons due to which someone chooses to conduct a PhD, the extent to which science is beneficial to everyday life and their aspects on whether science and scientists belong to ‘elite’. PhD students often come across challenges, successes, emotional instabilities, enthusiasm, satisfaction, but also failures and disappointments. Issues of power, truth, research, fame, mystery and understanding new worlds come on the surface and proved that human beings have desires and weaknesses. We tried via e-mail interviews (with PhD students) to look into all the previous issues mentioned above.
Referències
Athens, L. (1993a) ‘Blumer’s Advanced Course on Social Psychology’, pp. 163–93 in N.K. Denzin (ed.) Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 14. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bandura, A. and Walters, R. (1963). Social learning and personality development. (Vol. 14). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Boshier, R. (1990). Socio-psychological Factors in Electronic Networking. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 9, 1, pp. 49-64.
Blanchot, M. (1989). The Space of Literature (trans. A. Smock). London: University of Nebraska Press.
Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Swenton-Wall, P. and A. Mosher, A. (1993). Ethnographic field Methods and their Relation to Design. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, 123-155. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Busher, H. (2001) ‘Being and Becoming a Doctoral Student: Culture, Literacies and Self-identity’, Paper presented at TESOL Arabia Conference, 14–16 March.
Cazden, C. (2000) ‘Taking Cultural Differences into Account’, in B. Cope and M. Kalantis (eds) Multi-literacies: Literacy, Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
Cooley, C. Η. (1964) Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Schocken. (Orig. pub. 1902.)
Deegan, M.J. and Hill, M.R. (1991). Doctoral dissertations as luminal journeys of the self: betwixt and between in graduate sociology programs. Teaching Sociology 19(July), pp.322–32.
Douthwaite, B., N. C. de Haan, V. Manyong, and D. Keatinge. 2001. Blending "hard" and "soft" science: the "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 13. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art13/.
Duranti, A. (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flick, U. (2004). A companion to qualitative research, edited by Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardoff and Ines Steinke; translated by Bryan Jenner: London: SAGE Publications.
Gergen, K. (1972). Multiple identity: the healthy, happy human being wears many masks, Psychology today, 5, 31-35, 64-66.
Hakanen, J., Bakker, A.B. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. The Journal of School Psychology, 42, pp. 495-513.
Hirst, P.H. and Peters, R.S. (1970). The Logic of Education. London. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
James, N.R. (2003) ‘Teacher Professionalism, Teacher Identity: How Do I See Myself?’, Unpublished Doctorate of Education Thesis, University of Leicester, School of Education, July.
Kearns, H., Gardiner, M. and Marshall, K. (2008). ‘Innovation in PhD completion: the hardy shall succeed (and be happy!)’. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(2), pp. 77–89.
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (1988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 297-308.
Leonard, D., Becker, R. & Coate, K. (2005) To Prove Myself at the Highest Level: the benefits of doctoral study, Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2), 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062904
Leontari, A. (1996). Αυτοαντίληψη [Self-conception]. Athens. Ellinika Grammata.
McCoyd, J. L., & Kerson, T. S. (2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5(3), 389-406.Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meho, L. I. (2006). E‐mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,57(10), 1284-1295.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. Michael T. Gibbons, M. T. (2001). Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Olivero, N. and Lunt, P. (2004). When the ethic is functional to the method: the case of e-mail qualitative interviews. In E. A. Buchanan (ed.). Readings in virtual research ethics, Issues and controversies. Hershey (USA). Information Science Publishing. Chapter VI, pp. 101-113. https://books.google.gr/books?hl=el&lr=&id=0Qy9AQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA101&dq=Olivero,+N.+and+Lunt,+P.+(2004).+When+the+ethic+is+functional+to+the+method:+the+case+of+e-mail+qualitative+interviews.+In+E.+A.+Buchanan+(ed.).+Readings+in+virtual+research+ethics,+Issues+and+controversies.+Hershey+(USA).+Information+Science+Publishing.+C&ots=GPvQ9N1kqY&sig=otHJ-weD0kOYY8jIAQmQy0FNhZA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Papastamou, S. (1990). Διομαδικές σχέσεις [Intergroup relations]. Athens: Odysseas.
Paraskevopoulou-Kollia, E.-A. (2006). The social estimation of pre-school teachers (Doctoral dissertation). University of Crete, Rethimno.
Phipps, A., Parker, J. and Chambers, E. (2007). ‘Editorial: Knowledge transfer in the Arts and Humanities’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 6(3), pp. 235–6.
Pyhalto, K., Stubb, J. and Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Developmet, 14 (3), pp. 221-232.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Street, B.V. (1994) ‘Cross-cultural Perspectives on Literacy’, in J. Maybin (ed.) Language and
Literacy in Social Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and Open University Press.
https://files.nyu.edu/mr185/public/www/classes/readings/Aronowitzfull.htm, Aronowitz
http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU21.html , Selwyn and Robson, 1998
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC198502/pdf/mlab00170-0094.pdf , Storer, N.W.
http://monoskop.org/images/9/94/Blanchot_Maurice_The_Space_of_Literature.pdf , Blanchot, M. (1989). The Space of Literature (trans.). London: University of Nebraska Press.
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


