EFFECTIVENESS OF POWERPOINT PRESENTATION ON VOCABULARY RETENTION OF EFL FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION

Autores/as

  • Pham Thi Ngoc Mai English Lecturer, Faculty of Social Sciences and International Languages, Long An University of Economics and Industry, Long An Province, Vietnam
  • Thai Cong Dan Senior Lecturer, Dr., School of Foreign Languages, Can Tho University, Vietnam
  • Thai Phan Bao Han English Lecturer, Faculty of Social Sciences, Can Tho University of Technology, Can Tho City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v8i4.5156

Palabras clave:

EFL students, vocabulary retention, PPT, reading comprehension, Long An University of Economics and Industry

Resumo

Vocabulary learning plays an important role in language learning. To many language learners, lack of vocabulary is one of the biggest obstacles that prevent them from mastering the language. Moreover, there have been a lot of studies conducted to find out the way to help language learners acquire and retain learned vocabulary. Among them, PowerPoint is suggested by many researchers as one good way to help learners learn vocabulary retention through reading comprehension. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of PowerPoint on vocabulary retention in reading comprehension of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) first-year students at Long An University of Economics and Industry (DLA), Long An Province, Vietnam. Besides, this study investigates learners’ attitudes towards the use of PowerPoint in learning vocabulary. The participants were 60 non-English major students at DLA. Two instruments were (1) the tests on English vocabulary, (2) the questionnaire on the participants’ attitudes towards the use of PowerPoint in teaching and learning vocabulary, were investigated. The results demonstrated a significant difference in learners’ vocabulary retention: the participants in the experimental group remembered vocabulary longer than those in the control group. The study showed that the learners had positive attitudes towards the use of PPT (PowerPoint Presentation) in learning vocabulary retention.

Biografías do autor/a

  • Pham Thi Ngoc Mai, English Lecturer, Faculty of Social Sciences and International Languages, Long An University of Economics and Industry, Long An Province, Vietnam

    Ms. Pham Thi Ngoc Mai is currently a senior English lecturer at Long An University of Economics and Industry (DLA). She has held her MA in TESOL since 2015. Her main research interests are TEF/TESOL teaching and learning at any level, linguistics, ESP for Economics and Industry, Intercultural Communication (ICC), curriculum design, and professional development. She can be contacted at pham.mai@daihoclongan.edu.vn.

  • Thai Cong Dan, Senior Lecturer, Dr., School of Foreign Languages, Can Tho University, Vietnam

    Mr. Thai Cong Dan, is currently senior lecturer of English, School of Foreign Languages, Can Tho University (CTU), Vietnam, -cum-a project manager. He has held his PhD at Naresuan University, Thailand since 2010 in Educational Administration (English program). He got his MA in Cultural Aspects and Literature from University of Notre Dame du Lac (ND), Indiana, USA in 1999. His main research interests are TEF/TESOL issues, intercultural communication, high school and higher education levels in English learning and teaching, English program management, curriculum design, testing and evaluation, ESP for Tourism and Hospitality, Political Education, Food Technology, professional development, and educational administration. He can be reached at tcdan@ctu.edu.vn.

  • Thai Phan Bao Han, English Lecturer, Faculty of Social Sciences, Can Tho University of Technology, Can Tho City, Vietnam

    Miss Thai Phan Bao Han is presently an English lecturer at Can Tho University of Technology (CTUT). She earned her MA in TESOL in 2022 from Can Tho University, Vietnam. Her main research interests are TEF/TESOL teaching and learning at any level, linguistics, ESP for Technology and Engineering, Intercultural Communication (ICC), testing design, and professional development. She can be contacted at tpbhan@ctuet.edu.vn.

Citas

Al-Jarf, R. (2006). Making connections in vocabulary instruction. 2nd ClaSIC Conference. Singapore. December 7-9

Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University.

Al-Toubat, M.A. (2006). The use of PowerPoint in teaching vocabulary items. Retrieved January 27, 2011 from http://www.udel.edu/eli/2006P4L/tobat.pdf

Anderson, R. A., et al. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Seepansky, J. A. (2006). The impact of presentation graphics on students’ experience in the classroom. Computers and Education, 47(1), 116-126.

Atkins-Sayre, W., Hopkins, S., Mohundro, S., & Sayre, W. (1998). Rewards and liabilities of presentation software as an ancillary tool: Prison or paradise? Paper presented at the National Communication Association Eighty Fourth Annual Convention, New York.

Ausubel, D. (1968). The use of advanced organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal materials. Journal of Educational Psychology. 51(5), 267-272.

Avgerinou, L. & Ericson, D. (1997). A review of the concept of visual literacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (4), 280-291.

Bartsch, R. A., & Kobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers and Education, 41(1), 77-86.

Baumann, J. F., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Baumann, J. F. (2005). Vocabulary comprehension relationships. In B. Maloch, J. V. Hoffman, D. L. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, & J. Worthy (Eds.), Fifty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 117-131). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.

Beatty K. (2005). Teaching and Researching Computer-assisted Language Learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Teaching--Researching-Computer-Assisted-Language-Learning/Beatty/p/book/9781408205006

Bennett, J., Corbin, S. & Aurand, T. (2002). Presentation software: does it offer any pedagogical value? Proceedings of the Marketing Management Association: 2002, 62- 64.

Brauer, G. (2001). Pedagogy of language learning in higher education: An introduction. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED453670

Brinton, D. M. (2001). The use of media in language teaching. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 459-475). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.

Brown, T. & Perry, F. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly. 25 (4), pp. 655-670.

Bushong, S. (1998). Utilization of PowerPoint presentation software in library instruction of subject-specific reference sources. Master’s Thesis, Kent State University Cavalier.

Chall, J. S. (1987). Two vocabularies for reading: Recognition and meaning. In M. G. Mckeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chang, Y. (2005). The use of PowerPoint as a learning aids for international students. Master’s thesis, Indiana University South Bend.

Chris, R. & Gillie, C. H. (2005). FacetoFace - Elementary. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (2), 183-198.

Jennifer Clark (2008). Powerpoint and Pedagogy: Maintaining Student Interest in University Lectures, College Teaching, 56:1, 39-44, DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.56.1.39-46 Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/CTCH.56.1.39-46

Cobb, T. & Horst, M. (2001). Growing academic vocabulary with a collaborative on‐line database. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED457698. Retrieved from https://www.lextutor.ca/cv/itmelt01.htm

Collins. (n.d.) Cobuild Advanced Dictionary of English

Craik, F. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. Vol.11, pp. 671-684.

Crawley, D. C., & Frey, B. A. (2008). Examining the relationship between course management systems, presentation software, and student learning: An exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 4(1), 1-14, January-March 2008.

Ellis, N. C. & Sinclair, S. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and Syntax. George: Georgetown University Press.

Finocchiaro, Mary (1974). English As a Second Language: From Theory to Practice. New York. Regent Publishing Company

Fisher, D. L. (2003). Using PowerPoint for ESL teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. IX, No. 3, March 2005. Retrieved March 20, 2021 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Fisher-PowerPoint.html.

Flower, J. (2000). Start building your vocabulary. Hove: Language teaching.

Francia, E., M., V. (2009). The Power of PowerPoint in Listening at beginning levels of Spanish. A dissertation. Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Retrieved from https://ir-api.ua.edu/api/core/bitstreams/67629281-b0bc-4ba7-95ba-24f8e94a96b2/content

Frey, B. A., & Bimbaum, D. J. (2002). Learners’ perceptions on the value of PowerPoint in lectures. ERIC Document Reproduction Service: ED 467192. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED467192

Froehlich, J. (1999). Language lab – multimedia lab – future lab. In G., Hogan-Brun, & U. O. H., Jung. (Eds.), Media, multimedia, online media (pp. 149-155). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Language Publishers.

Gairn, R. & Redman, S. (1990). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gerlach, V. S., & Ely, D. P. (1980). Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Incorporated.

Grabe, W. (2004). Research on L2 reading instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24. 44-69.

Haycraft, J. (1978). An Introduction to English Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Herbert, W. and Shohamy, E. (1989). Second Language Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Herrell, A. L. (2000). Fifty strategies for teaching English language learners. Upper Saddle

Hornby, A. S. (1995). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (5th Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

James, K. E., Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2006). Powerful or pointless? Faculty versus student perceptions of PowerPoint use in business education. Business Communication Quarterly, 69 (4), 374-396.

Jones, A. M. (2003). The use and abuse of PowerPoint in Teaching and Learning in the Life Sciences: A Personal Overview. BEE-j Vol. 2, November 2003. Retrieved on November 25, 2022 from http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/vol2/beej-2-3.pdf

Khabiri, M. & Pakzad, M. (2012). The effect of teaching critical reading strategies on EFL learners’ vocabulary retention. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills 4(1), 74 Spring 2022, Ser. 66/4

Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2007). Breaking down words to build meaning: Morphology, vocabulary, and reading comprehension in the urban classroom. Reading Teacher, 61(2), 134 144.

Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (3) 285-299.

Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? Special Language: From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines. C. Lauren and Nordman. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, 316-323.

Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading. In J. Coady & Huckins (Eds), Second language vocabulary acquisition (p. 20-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Le, P. L., & Nguyen, H. N. (2007). Những yêu cầu sư phạm cho một bài giảng bằng PowerPoint. Hội thảo tập huấn nâng cao năng lực cho giáo viên cốt cán trường THPT về đổi mới phương pháp dạy học theo chương trình SGK lớp 10 mới. School of Education, Can Tho University, 70-80.

Lin H., Chen T. (2007). Reading authentic EFL text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment. Language Learning & Technology. Volume II, Number 3, pp. 83-106.

Lowry, R. (1999). Electronic presentation of lectures-effect upon student performance. University Chemistry Education, 3(1), 18-21.

Mantei, E. J. (2000). Using internet class notes and PowerPoint in the physical geology lecture. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 301-305.

Moody, H. (1998). Using technology to enhance the effectiveness of chemistry courses. The Technology Source, November 1998. Retrieved in December 9, 2010 from http://www.technologysource.org/article/using_technology_to_enhance_the_effectiveness_of_chemistry_courses/

Morales, K. N. S. (2010). Promoting the Reading Comprehension of Freshman Engineering Students Through an Interactive Approach to Content-Based Materials. Philippine ESL Journal, Vol. 5, July 2010.

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000, p. 4-1

Nguyen, C. T. (2008). A study on communicative language interaction PowerPoint-assisted English language teaching in some high schools in Binh Dinh. Unpublished Master’s thesis on TESOL principles and methodology. Hue University, Vietnam.

Nouri, H. & Sharid, A. (2005). The effect of PowerPoint presentation on student learning & attitudes. Global Perpective on Accounting Education, Vol. 2, (p. 53-73).

Nowaczyk, R. H., Santos, L. T., and Patton, C. (1998). Student perception of multimedia in the undergraduate classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media: 25, 4, 367- 382.

Parker, A.B.R, et al. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 42(3): 151-157.

Phillips, S. (1993) Young learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd Ed.). London: Pearson Education.

Richman, J., & Grudzinzki, M. (2000). Student expectations of information technology use in the classroom. Educause Quarterly, 1, 24-30.River, New Jersey: Merrill.

Roblyer, M. (2006). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching (4th ed.) Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merill Prentice Hall

Roger, G., Diane, P., Steve, W. (1995). Teaching practice handbook. Heinemann.

Schcolnik, M. & Kol, S. (1999). Using presentation software to enhance language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. V, No. 3, March 1999. Retrieved December 11, 2020 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Schcolnik-PresSoft.html

Schimitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge

Schut, C. R. (2007). Student perceptions of interactive whiteboards in a biology classroom. Master’s thesis, Cedarville University, USA.

Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Education.

Snow, C. E., Porche, M. V., Tabors, P. O., & Harris, S. R. (2007). Is literacy enough? Pathways to academic success for adolescents. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Stahl, S. A. (1990). Beyond the instrumentalist hypothesis: some relations between word meanings and comprehension. Technical Report No. 505 of the Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Stein. K. (2006). The dos and don’ts of PowerPoint presentations. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106(11), 1745-1748.

Susskind, J. (2005). PowerPoint’s power in the classroom: Enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers & Education, 45, 203-215.

Swanborn, M.L.S. (1999). Incidental Word Learning While Reading: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Reasearch. American Educational Research Association.

Van Aacken, S. (1996). The efficacy of CALL in Kanji learning. On‐CALL, 10, 2, 2‐14.

Vu T. P. T. (2003). The contribution of Multimedia tools to EFL settings unfamiliar with technology. The Asian EFL journal. Retrieved November 27, 2010 from http://asian-efl-journal.com/sept_03_sub3.php.

Wallace, J. M. (1982). Teaching Vocabulary. London: Briddles Ltd.

Wang, G. (2005). Humanistic approach and affective factors in foreign language teaching, May 2005, 2(5) (Serial No. 17), Sino-US English Teaching, USA.

Webster’s New World Medical Dictionary (2008). Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Wendy. R. (2014). Presentation Software Terminology. Retrieved from: http://presentationsoft.about.com/od/pq/g/powerpoint-presentation.htm

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.

Wilmoth, J., Wybraniee, J. (1998). Profits and pitfall: thoughts on using a laptop computer and presentation software to teach introductory social statistics. Teaching Sociology, 2006, 166-178.

Wong, A. F. L. & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Using IT for Lesson Presentations. In Tan, S. C. & Wong, A. F. L. Eds. Teaching and Learning with Technology: An Asia-Pacific Perspective. Singapore: Pearson Education Asia Pte Ltd. pp.118-131.

Yancy, M. (2006). The integrating of technology into the public speaking classroom. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 1088-1094). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Descargas

Publicada

2024-01-02

Número

Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2023)

Sección

Articles

Licenza

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).