THE USE OF NAO ROBOTS IN TEACHING CHILDREN WITH AUTISM

Penulis

  • Bojana Arsić University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Anja Gajić University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Sara Vidojković University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dragana Maćešić-Petrović University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Aleksandra Bašić University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Ružica Zdravković Parezanović University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v7i1.4232

Kata Kunci:

skill acquisition, Nao robots, autism, teaching, technology

Abstrak

There is an increasing number of people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and therefore different software and hardware solutions are made for them. The effectiveness of any type of treatment is connected to its intensity and interventions based on the use of technology can allow that. The aim of this literature review is to examine the effectiveness of interventions focused on teaching people with ASD with the use of Nao robots. For the literature search, we used Google Scholar, SciIndex and ProQuest search engines. The articles were searched by using keywords: autism, autism spectrum disorders, Nao robots, and humanoid robots. We included articles published in the last 10 years that were original research articles focused on teaching people with ASD certain skills. In the review section, we included eight research. The average effectiveness of these interventions was 40.3%. The reasons for insufficient success are a subjective measurement of intervention success and a low number of sessions. Having in mind that parents of people with ASD often choose interventions that are not scientifically based, we believe it is of great importance to implement research focused on the effectiveness of different treatment modalities, which is also the main significance of this article. Suggestions for future research in this area are discussed, as well as the limitations of this paper.

Biografi Penulis

  • Bojana Arsić, University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia

    Bojana Arsić – PhD Student at University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation. Areas of interest: Autism spectrum disorders, evidence-based treatments, applied behavior analysis, self-help skills.

  • Anja Gajić, University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia

    Anja Gajić – PhD Student at University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation. Areas of interest: Autism spectrum disorders, early intervention, evidence-based practices, functional communication training.

  • Sara Vidojković, University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia

    Sara Vidojković – PhD Student at University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation. Areas of interest: vocational rehabilitation, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, social skills training.

  • Dragana Maćešić-Petrović, University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia

    Dragana Maćešić-Petrović – Full-time professor at University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, as well as University of Novi Sad, Medical Faculty. Areas of interest: intellectual disability, hearing impairments, developmental neuropsychology, assistive technology, sensomotor integration, dance and movement therapy.

  • Aleksandra Bašić, University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia

    Aleksandra Bašić – Teaching assistant at University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation. Areas of interest: Methodology in special education, intellectual disabilities, dance therapy, Montessori method, assistive technology.

  • Ružica Zdravković Parezanović, University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, Visokog Stevana 2, Belgrade, Serbia

    Ružica Zdravković Parezanović – PhD student at University of Belgrade, Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation. Areas of interest: Burnout syndrome, sensomotor integration, creative teaching.

Referensi

Aresti-Bartolome, N., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. (2014). Technologies as Support Tools for Persons with Autistic Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(8), 7767-7802;

Arsić, B., Gajić, A., Vidojković, S., Ivanović, K., Bašić, A., & Maćešić-Petrović, D. (2021). Types of treatments used by parents of children with autism. Isagoge, 1(6), 01-27.

Beer, J. M., Boren, M., & Liles, K. R. (2016). Robot Assisted Music Therapy: A Case Study with Children Diagnosed with Autism. 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 419-420.

Boyd, B. A., Hume, K., McBee, M. T., Alessandri, M., Gutierrez, A., & Johnson, L. S. (2014). Comparative efficacy of LEAP, TEACCH and non-model-specific special education programs for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(2), 366-368.

Chevalier, P., Isableu, B., Martin, J.C., Tapus, A. (2015). Individuals with Autism: Analysis of the First Interaction with Nao Robot Based on Their Proprioceptive and Kinematic Profiles. In: Borangiu T. (Еds.) Advances in Robot Design and Intelligent Control. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 371. Springer, Cham, pp.225-233.

Chevalier, P., Martin, J. C., Isableu, B., Bazile, C., Iacob, D. O., & Tapus, A. (2016). Joint Attention Using Human-Robot Interaction: Impact of Sensory Preferences of Children with Autism. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), August 26-31, 2016. Columbia University, NY, USA, pp 849-854.

Geretsegger, M., Holck, U., Bieleninik, L., & Gold, C. (2016). Feasibility of a trial on improvisational music therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Music Therapy, 53(2), 93-120.

Goh, D. H., Ang, R. P., & Tan, H. C. (2008). Strategies for designing effective psychotherapeutic gaming interventions for children and adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2217-2235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.007

Hart, М. (2005). Autism/Excel Study, in Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, New York, NY, USA, pp. 136–141.

Kern, P., Rivera, N. R., Chandler, A., & Humpal, M. (2013). Music therapy services for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A survey of clinical practices and training needs. Journal of Music Therapy, 50(4), 274-303.

Kim, J., Wigram, T., & Gold, C. (2008). The effects of improvisational music therapy on joint attention behaviors in autistic children: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(9), 1758-1766.

Kohn, J. G., LeBlanc, M., & Mortola, P. (1994). Measuring quality and performance of assistive technology: Results of a prospective monitoring program. Assistive Technology, 6(2), 120–125.

Lenker, J. A., & Paquet, V. L. (2003). A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 15(1), 1–15.

Liu, X., Zhou, X., Liu, C., Wang, J., Zhou, X., Xu, N., & Jiang, A. (2016). An interactive training system of motor learning by imitation and speech instructions for children with autism. 9th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), pp 56-61.

Luthffi Idzhar, I., Syamimi, S., Hanafiah, Y., Fazah Akhtar, H., & Nur Ismarrubie, Z. (2012). Robot-based Intervention Program for Autistic Children with Humanoid Robot NAO: Initial Response in Stereotyped Behavior. International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors - IRIS 2012. Procedia Engineering, 41, pp. 1441 – 1447.

Miskam, M. A., Shamsuddin, S., Ridzuan, M., Samat, A., Yusso, H., Ainudin, H.A., Omar, A.R. (2014). Humanoid robot NAO as a teaching tool of emotion recognition for children with autism using the Android app. 2014 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS), pp.1-5.

Palestra, G., Bortone, I., Cazzato, D., Adamo, F., Argentiero, A., Agnello, N., & Distante, C. (2014). Social robots in postural education: A new approach to address body consciousness in ASD children, in Social Robotics, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, M. Beetz, B. Johnston, and M.-A. Williams, Eds. Springer International Publishing, 8755, 290–299.

Pot, E., Monceaux, J., Gelin, R., & Maisonnier, B. (2009). Robotics, Choregraphe: a Graphical Tool for Humanoid Robot Programming. The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication Toyama, Japan, 2009.

Ricks, D. J., & Colton, M. B. (2010). Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy, in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference, pp. 4354-4359.

Robins, B., Dickerson, P., Stribling, P., & Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robot mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in robot human interaction. Interaction Studies, 5(2), 161–198.

Suzuki, R., & Lee, J. (2016). Robot-play therapy for improving prosocial behaviours in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2016 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS).

Suzuki, R., Lee, J., & Rudovic, O. (2020). NAO-Dance Therapy for Children with ASD. Conference Paper, pp 295-296. doi: 10.1145/3029798.3038354

Taheri, A., Meghdari, A., Alemi, M., & Pouretemad, H. (2017). Human–Robot Interaction in Autism Treatment: A Case Study on Three Pairs of Autistic Children as Twins, Siblings, and Classmates. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12369-017-0433-8

Taheria, A., Meghdaria, A., Alemia, M., & Pouretemade, H.R. (2019). Teaching music to children with autism: A social robotics challenge. Scientia Iranica, 26(1), 40-58.

World health organization (2011). WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data World report on disability.

Wuolle, K. S., Doren, C. L. V., Bryden, A. M., Peckman, P. H., Keith, M., Kilgore, K. L., et al. (1999). Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuro prosthesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 206–213.

Diterbitkan

2022-04-08

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles