LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE INNOVATIVE LEARNING GLASS / LIGHTBOARD IN HYBRID EDUCATION

Auteurs

  • Eftychia Aslanidou PhD Candidate, Department of Digital Media & Communication, Ionian University, Greece Head of Studies, The Hellenic American Academy, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v7i2.4563

Trefwoorden:

Learning Glass, Lightboard in education, looking glass, IT in education, hybrid education, education technology, supplement digital tool in education, alternative education, media in education / Νέες Τεχνολογίες στην Εκπαίδευση, Νέα Μέσα στην Εκπαίδευση,

Samenvatting

This article provides a review of recent literature regarding the use of the innovative Learning Glass-type technologies in different educational settings. Learning Glass “LG” / Lightboard in Hybrid education, a modern educational tool produced in the United States (Western Michigan University, Southeastern University, San Diego State University & Cornell University) which works a two-sided flip board proven to promote learning growth and keeps students of typical and non-typical development engaged. Our purpose is to investigate the potential of this technology to serve as a supplement tool in a range of specifically targeted education settings, including culturally diverse learners, hybrid education and social media involvement. Preliminary evidence indicates the capabilities of LG to help instructors retain their students’ attention in the meta COVID-19 era. 

Αυτό το άρθρο παρέχει μια ανασκόπηση της πρόσφατης βιβλιογραφίας σχετικά με τη χρήση των καινοτόμων τεχνολογιών τύπου Learning Glass σε διαφορετικά εκπαιδευτικά περιβάλλοντα. Το Γυαλί Μάθησης "LG" / Lightboard στην υβριδική εκπαίδευση, είναι ένα σύγχρονο εκπαιδευτικό εργαλείο που παράγεται και χρησιμοποιείται στις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες (Πανεπιστήμιο Δυτικού Μίτσιγκαν, Πανεπιστήμιο Southeastern, Πολιτειακό Πανεπιστήμιο του Σαν Ντιέγκο & Πανεπιστήμιο Κορνέλ), λειτουργεί με μια πλακέτα διπλής όψης που αποδεδειγμένα προωθεί τη γνωστική ανάπτυξη και κρατά αφοσιωμένους μαθητές τυπικής και μη τυπικής ανάπτυξης. Σκοπός μας είναι να διερευνήσουμε τις δυνατότητες αυτής της τεχνολογίας και το πώς χρησιμεύει ως συμπληρωματικό εργαλείο σε μια σειρά ειδικών στοχευμένων εκπαιδευτικών πλαισίων, συμπεριλαμβανομένων πολιτιστικά διαφορετικών μαθητών, μέσω της υβριδικής και δια ζώσης εκπαίδευσης και της συμμετοχής στα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης. Τα πρώτα στοιχεία υποδεικνύουν τις ποικίλες δυνατότητες του LG, το οποίο βοηθά τους εκπαιδευτές να διατηρήσουν την προσοχή των μαθητών τους στην εποχή της μετα COVID-19.

Biografie auteur

  • Eftychia Aslanidou, {$affiliation)

    Eftychia Aslanidou, is a PhD Cand. at the Ionian University, in the Department of Digital Media & Communication. She completed her first studies at the School of Primary Education at the University of Crete. She was distinguished by the State Scholarship Foundation for her ethos and her academic performance for each and every year of study 2008-2012 as the "top of the graduate student in Greece". She was also awarded the "Triantafyllia Kriezi" scholarship as the top Macedonian student. Eftychia left her homeland to see what more she could learn and consequently bring back to offer to the children of Greece. She continued her studies of bilingualism abroad, in New York. There she attended the prominent universities City University of New York, Long Island University, and Westchester College while also teaching at the Greek-American school Plato. When she returned to Greece, she continued her studies at both the European University for Special Inclusive Education and at the Aristotle University for Preschool Education. She has presented her findings on inclusive education to several national conferences and journals and taught in public schools in Zakynthos until cofounding "The Hellenic American Academy" with Steve Krause. She designed the model learning center as a means to offer the most effective excellent education, tailored to the individual needs of children in Zakynthos. Eftychia, PhD Cand. of the Ionian University, along with The Hellenic American Academy, and its partners envision a bright future for the next generation. In the demanding environment of modern education, she promises to support children and their parents’ educational needs with cutting-edge methods, child-centered teaching practices and the development of parental relationships.

Referenties

Anderson, M. (2016). The Learning Glass with Matt Anderson. SDSU: CSU Institutional Repository.

Aslanidou, E. (2021). The importance of social situations, relational phenomena in young children: A review of recent evidence. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 6 (1), 35-39.

Aslanidou, E. (2019). Home Learning Activities and Children’s Learning Outcomes: A Review of Recent Evidence. European Journal of Education Studies, 6 (1), 100-159. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2375.

Beka-Bajrami, F. (2022). The use of Information Technology in education on the time of COVID-19-case study. 11th International Conference of Technium Science, 15-01.

Birdwell, J. A., & Peshkin, M. (2015). Capturing Technical Lectures on Lightboard. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 26-325.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school (2nd ed). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Chan, M. W., & Cushman, R. (2020). Beyond the Learning Glass. STEM Instructional Graduate Teaching Assistant Posters, 19. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/stem-gta-posters/19

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th edition). New York: Taylor & Francis.

Dawes, I. (2001). What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.), Issues in Teaching using ICT. London: Routledge, 61- 79.

Dorantes, A. (2016). Economics and ‘The Learning Glass’ Technology. SDSU: CSU Institutional Repository. https://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/165572

Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., Cook, J. L., & Travers, J. F. (2000). Educational psychology: effective teaching, effective learning. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Firouzian, S., Rasmussen, C., & Anderson, M. (2016). Adaptations of learning glass solutions in undergraduate STEM education. The XIX Annual Conference on Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 25-27, Pittsburgh, PA.

Foss, B., Oftedal, B. F., & Lokken, A. (2013). Rich Media e-Compendiums: A New Tool for Enhanced Learning in Higher Education, European Journal of Open, Distance and Learning, 16 (1), 102-114.

Fung, F. M. (2017). Adopting Lightboard for a Chemistry Flipped Classroom to Improve Technology-Enhanced Videos for Better Learner Engagement, Journal of Chemical Education, 94 (7), 956-959.

Gleason, B. & Greenhow, C. (2017). Hybrid Education: The Potential of Teaching and Learning with Robot-Mediated Communication. Online Learning Journal, 21 (4), 159-176.

Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(4), 700-717.

Gregoriadis, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., Tsigilis, N., & Zachopoulou, E. (2020). Assessing Teacher-Child Relationships: A cultural context perspective. In O. Saracho (Ed.). Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children. 4th edition, pp. 322-332. New York, NY: Routledge. Doi: 10.4324/9780429442827

Hall, S., & Villareal, D. (2015). The Hybrid Advantage: Graduate Student Perspectives of Hybrid Education Courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27 (1), 69-80.

Hallas, J. (2020). Behind the Learning Glass. STEM Instructional Graduate Teaching Assistant Posters, 13. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/stem-gta-posters/13

Ivanović, M., Xinogalos, S., Pitner, T, & Savic, M. (2017). Technology enhanced learning in programming courses – international perspective. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2981–3003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9565-y

Kaqinari, T., Makarova, E., Audran, J., Döring, A. K., Göbel, K., & Kern, D. (2022). A Latent Class Analysis of University Lecturers’ Switch to Online Teaching during the First COVID-19 Lockdown: The Role of Educational Technology, Self-Efficacy, and Institutional Support. Education Sciences, 12(9), 607.

Karassavidis, I. (2001). Constructivist learning online. Possibilities and perspectives. In V. Makrakis (ed.), Proceedings of the Panhellenic Conference, 8-10 June 2001, Rethymnon.

Konstantakis, M., Lykiardopoulou, A., Lykiardopoulou, E., Tasiouli, G., & Heliades, G. (2022). An Exploratory Study of Mobile-Based Scenarios for Foreign Language Teaching in Early Childhood. Education Sciences, 12 (5), 306.

Koppe, C., Norgard, R. T., & Pedersen, A. Y. (2017). Towards a pattern language for hybrid education. VikingPLOP ’17: Proceedings of the VikingPLOP 2017 Conference on Pttern Languages of Program.

Laurillard, D., Oliver, M., Wasson, B., Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing Technology-Enhanced Learning. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_17

Liu, G. & Zhu, L. (2022). Information Technology-Based Picture Book Design of Children’s Intellectual and Educational Anecdotes. International Conference on Cognitive based Information Processing and Applications (CIPA 2021). Springer: Singapore. 982-985.

Lubrick, M., Zhou, G., & Zhang, J. (2019). Is the future bright? The potential of lightboard videos for student achievement and engagement in learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), em1735.

Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2007). Technology-Enhanced Learning, The Role of Theory. In: H. Beetham, R. Sharpe. (eds) Rethinking of Pedagogy for a Digital Age, Routledge, New York.

Misirlis, N., & Munawar, H. B. (2022). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use metaverse technologies. In 12th International Conference: The Future of Education (pp. 159-163).

Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning. Future Lab Report, 11.

Negi, P. S., Negi, V. & Pandey, A. C. (2011). Impact of information technology on learning, teaching and human resource management in educational sector. International Journal of Computer Science and Telecommunications, 2 (4), 66-72.

Pedersen, A. Y., Norgaard, R. T., & Koppe, C. (2018). Patterns of inclusion: Fostering Digital Citizenship through Hybrid Education. Educational Technology & Society, 21 (1), 225-236.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Rogers, P. D., & Botnaru, D. T. (2019). Shedding Light on Student Learning through the Use of Lightboard Videos. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13 (3), 6.

Rostislav, F. (2014). Mobile Technologies Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 342-346.

Salomon, G., & Gardner, H. (1986). The computer as educator: Lessons from television research. Educational Researcher, 15 (1), 13-19.

Schweiker, S. S., Griggs, B. K., & Levonis, S. M. (2020). Engaging Health Student in Learning Organic Chemistry Reaction Mechanisms Using Short and Snappy Lightboard Videos. Journal of Chemical Education, 97 (10), 3867-3871.

Schweiker, S. S., & Levonis, S. M. (2020). A quick guide to producing a virtual chemistry course for online education. Future Medicinal Chemistry, 12 (14), 1289-1291.

Skibinski, E. S., DeBenedetti, J. I., Ortoll-Bloch, A. G., & Hines, M. A. (2015). A Blackboard for the 21st Century: An Inexpensive LightBoard Projection System for Classroom Use, Journal of Chemical Education, 92 (10), 1754-1756.

Sofos, A. (2021). Teaching practices for intercultural education using New Media. Athens: ION. [In Greek]

Talanda-Fisher, M. (2020). Through the Learning Glass. STEM Instructional Graduate Teaching Assistant Posters, 18. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/stem-gta-posters/18

Todman, J., & Duck, G. (1993). Primary children and teachers' attitudes to computers. Computers in Education, 20 (2), 199-203.

Tosheva, N., & Abdullaeva, G. (2022). The Concept of Innovation and Types of Innovative Technologies. Scientific progress, 3(3), 586-589.

Downloads

Gepubliceerd

2022-11-22

Nummer

Vol 7 Nr 2 (2022)

Sectie

Articles

Licentie

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).