HIGHLIGHTING EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN A TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v7i2.4487Palavras-chave:
educational needs, Biology, primary school teachersResumo
This paper concerns the investigation of the educational needs of a group of teachers, who expressed interest in attending a training program that utilized Digital Educational Content and Open Educational Resources in the teaching of biological concepts in Primary School. The results of the research showed that the teachers wish to be trained in all the subjects of the Curriculum with an emphasis on environmental and disease issues and on new skills and practices that promote the student-centered model. Moreover, they wish for a program to utilize Digital Educational Content and cultivate scientific skills and scientific literacy in students. Regarding the form of the program, participants preferred asynchronous and suggested a duration of 4-5 weeks.Referências
Avery, L. M., & Meyer, D. Z. (2012). Teaching science as science is practiced: Opportunities and limits for enhancing preservice elementary teachers' self‐efficacy for science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 395-409.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. UK: Oxford University Press.
Cranton, P. (2000). Individual differences and transformative learning. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress, 181-204.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative ad quantitative research. Educational Research. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. DOI: 10.1080/135406002100000512
Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education & Lifelong Learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
Karalis, T. (2005). Planning, Administration, Program Evaluation, (Volume II). Patra: Hellenic Open University [in Greek].
Kedraka, K. (2009). Adult Educators in Greece: development, searches, reflections. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Brothers [in Greek].
Kedraka, K., & Dimasi, M. (2016). Teaching in Higher Education: Obligation, burden or privilege? In: S. Kioulanis, A. Paschalidou, & Z. Harpantidou (Ed.), Innovative Applications in Teaching Practice. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress of Applied Experiential Teaching, (172-197). Scientific And Educational Association, Educational Cycle (Ekp@ideftikos Kyklos). Drama, 27-29 November 2015. In: http://www.educircle.gr/synedrio/announcements [in Greek].
Knowles, M. S. (1970). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy versus Pedagogy. Νew York: Association Press.
Knowles, M., Holton III, E., & Swanson, R. (1998). The Adult Learner. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Muppudathi, G., & Pazhanivelu, G. (2012). Effect of e-content on teaching biology at secondary level. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research and Innovations, 2(2), 31-33.
OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World: Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264040014-en
Queeney, D. S. (1995). Assessing Needs in Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rotidi G., Kedraka K., Frementiti EM., & Kaltsidis C. (2020). University Pedagogy in Greece: Pedagogical Needs of Greek Academics from Ionian University. In: Α. Kavoura, E. Kefallonitis, P. Theodoridis (Eds.), Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36126-6_81/
Sork, T., & Buskey, J. (1986). A Descriptive and Evaluating Analysis of Program Planning Literature, 1950-1983. Adult Education Quarterly, 36(2), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848186036002003
Tzovla, E., & Kedraka, K. (2020a). Personal biology teaching efficacy beliefs and biology teaching outcome expectancy of in-service elementary teachers. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(10), 143-159. DOI: 10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3286 ISSN 2501 - 1111.
Tzovla, E., & Kedraka, K. (2020b). Teaching Biology in Primary Education. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 8(2), 91-97. DOI: 10.20448/2003.82.91.97
Tzovla E. & Kedraka, K. (2021). Exploring Teachers' Views on the Impact of an Online Distance Learning Course on Their Self-Efficacy Beliefs. International Journal of Learning and Development 11(3). doi:10.5296/ijld.v11i3
Tzovla, E., Kedraka, K., & Kaltsidis, C. (2021a). Investigating In-service Elementary School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Participating in MOOC for Teaching Biological Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), em1946. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9729
Tzovla, E., Kedraka, K., Karalis, T., Kougiourouki, M, & Lavidas, K. (2021b). Effectiveness of in-service elementary school teacher professional development MOOC: an experimental research. Contemporary Educational Technology 13(4) ep324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11144
Vergidis, D. (1999). Design and construction of adult education programs. In D. Vergidis & T. Karalis (Eds.), Adult Education. Program Design, Organization, and Evaluation (Volume II), (p. 11-61). Patra: Hellenic Open University [in Greek].
Vergidis, D. (2021). Educational needs (educational needs assessment). Adult Education Critical Issues, 1(1), 78–80. https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/aeci/article/view/28854
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


