DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT, A VERSATILE TOOL FOR TEACHING AND ASSESSING CRITICAL READING
キーワード:
dynamic assessment、 interventionist DA、 Interactionist DA、 critical reading要旨
This study presents Dynamic Assessment (Henceforth DA) as a way of mixing assessment and instruction. For this purpose, a number of reading strategies were applied to the reading course of ten EFL students studying in a language school. The strategies were incorporated in the reading course through DA and assessed via the same method. The data collection procedure was conducted through "University of Florida Critical Thinking Inventory Manual", "Observation logs" and "New tasks". Question one of the study dealt with awareness of students; for this question two types of data were gathered; quantitative data were gathered via EMI and qualitative data via descriptive records in teaching logs which showed an increase in students' awareness to CT. The aim of the second question was to prove that students have acquired these core CT skills and can apply them to analyzing unseen texts. Therefore, two new tasks, similar in length and level of difficulty but different in content, were designed and implemented, one at the beginning of the program and the other one at a fairly long interval after mediation. Results showed that DA had a significant effect on their ability to transfer the core critical thinking skills to unseen situations and critically read a text.
参考文献
Ableeva R. (2007). Assessing Listening for Development. In R. Alanen and S. Poyhonen (eds.) Language in Action. Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 352-379.
Ajideh, P. & Nourdad, N. (2012). The Effect of Dynamic Assessment on EFL Reading Comprehension in Different Proficiency Levels. Journal of Language Testing in Asia 2012, 2:101-122.
Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, March, 2003.
Bendar. M. R., and Kletzien, S. B. (1990). Dynamic assessment for reading: A validation. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
Best, J. W. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Bijandi, P., & Naeini, J. (2007). Ta’sire raveshe hamyari bar tafakor enteghadiye zabanamuzane Irani. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 84 (3), 22, 10-15.
Campione, J. C. & Brown, A. L. (1990).Guided learning and transfer: Implications for approaches to assessment in Diagnostic Monitoring of Skill & Knowledge Acquisition, Ed. Frederiksen, et al., Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ.
Cioffi, G. and Carney, J. (1983). Dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. The Reading teacher, 36, 764-768.
Davin, K. J. (2011). Group Dynamic Assessment In Early Foreign Language Learning Program: Tracking Movement through the Zone of Proximal Development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pittsburgh University, USA.
Jacobes, E. L. (2001). The effect of adding dynamic assessment component to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorder Quarterly, 22(4), 217-226.
Kareshky, H. (2005). Jayegah-e tafakor-e nagh-ghaddarbarnameha-ye darsi-ye reshteha-ye olum-e tarbiyati. Paper presented at the first seminar of Analyzing and Composing the System of Educational Sciences. University of Ferdowsi, Mashad.
Kozulin& Garb (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL Text Comprehension of At-Risk Students. School Psychology International, Vol 23, I, pp 112-127.
Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Lang. Teach, 42:3, 355–368.
Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. (2004). Dynamic Assessment: Bringing the Past into the Future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 49-74.
Lantolf, J. P. and S. L. Thorne. (2006). The Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: OUP.
Lidz, C. S. & Gindis, B. (2003).Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children with typical and atypical development. In A. Kozulin, V. Ageyev, S. Miller, & B. Gindis (Eds.). Vygotsky's theory of education in cultural context [pp. 99-116]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Maleki, H. (2005). Barnamehrizi-ye taffakormehvar. Paper presented at the seminar of Production of Science in Education. The Organization of Islamic Azad University Schools, Tehran.
Marashi, H., & Jodeiri, S. (2006). On the relationship between critical ability of Iranian intermediate EFL learners and their writing performance. Paper presented at the first language and linguistics seminar, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch.
Mardani. M., M. Tavakoli (2011). Beyond Reading Comprehension: The Effect of Adding a Dynamic Assessment Component on EFL Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2: 3, 688-696.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and promoting L2 development. USA. Springer Science.
Poehner, M. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-491.
Poenher, M, E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2005).Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 9, 3, pp 233-265.
Roseberry, C. A., and Connel, P. G. (1991).The use of an invented rule in the differentiation of normal and language-impaired Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 596-603.
Sternberg, R. J. and E. L. Grigorenko. (2002). Dynamic Testing. The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliber, L. K. (2000). Critical Reading and Critical Thinking: the State of the Art. Ilha do Desterro (38), p.15-37.
Tung, C. & Chang, S. (2009).Developing Critical Thinking through Literature Reading. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.(19) p.287-317.
Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
ダウンロード
発行日
巻号
セクション
ライセンス
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


