THE DOMINANT MODEL OF COMMUNICATION IN TRADITIONAL TEACHING AND MODERN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS
Keywords:
communication, education, communication skills, quality teachingAbstract
The traditional school system included adopting as much information without critical thinking while modern school tends to democratic education that is focused on the development of individual abilities of each student and to develop his critical thinking. In traditional teaching communication the teacher dominates. Such is the autocratic communication which was reflected in a bossy role of teachers while in modern teaching the emphasis is on the student's role and the democratic communication. In pursuing the goal of non-experimental empirical research that we set in our study, we found that there is a statistically significant connection between interpersonal communication in teaching and students' success, and that those students whose teachers mostly used the democratic model of communication in teaching achieved statistically significantly better school achievements than those students whose teachers use mainly the autocratic model of communication. The survey was conducted in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Herzegovina-Neretva Canton) and a sample of 423 respondents (322 students and 101 teachers of primary schools). Through the results, contents and messages of this paper we have tried to make you aware of the importance of this segment of communication in the learning process and as such to make it the subject of everyday questioning and continuous work that should lead to its improvement, and thus to improving the quality of the entire educational process.
References
Caspe, M. S. (2003). How teachers come to understand families. The School Community Journal, 13(1), 115-131.
Delors, J. and others. (1998). Učenje: blago u nama. Zagreb: Educa.
Glasser, W. (1993). Nastavnik u kvalitetnoj školi. Zagreb: Educa.
Greene, B. (1996). Nove paradigme za stvaranje kvalitetnih škola. Zagreb: Alinea.
Von Hentig, H. (1997). Humana škola. Zagreb: Educa.
Ilić, M. (1995). Cilj, zadaci i sadržaji vaspitno-obrazovnog rada u uslovima savremenih promjena. Banja Luka: Naša škola 1-2.
Ilić. M. ( 1999 ): Od tradicionalne do kvalitetne škole, Radovi, Banja Luka
Knapp, M. and Hall, J. (2010). Neverbalna komunikacija. Zagreb: Naklada Slap.
Krech, D. and Crutchfield, R. (1972). Pojedinac u društvu. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
Kyriacou, C. (2001). Temeljna nastavna umijeća. Zagreb: Educa.
Lunenburg, F.C. (2010). Communication: The Process, barriers and Improving Effectiveness. Schooling, 1(1), Sam Houston State University.
Ožegović, D. (2006). Komunikacija u nastavi. Istočno Sarajevo: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Reardon, K. (1998). Interpersonalna komunikacija. Zagreb: Alinea.
Salovey, P. and Sluyter, J.D. (1997). Emocionalni razvoj i emocionalna inteligencija.
Stevanović, M. and Ajanović, Dž. (1998). Školska pedagogija. Sarajevo: Prosvjetni list.
Tubbs, S. (2013). Komunikacija. Beograd: Clio.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
