AN ADVANCED STATISTICAL METHOD RESEARCH ON THE EFFECT OF KNOWLEDGE USE LEVELS ON SOME SKILLS

Автор(и)

  • Abbas Doğan Ministry of National Education, Turkey
  • Reyhan Sekerci Dr., Ministry of National Education, Turkey
  • Beyhan Güven Ministry of National Education, Turkey
  • Alper Güven Ministry of National Education, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v6i1.3835

Ключові слова:

knowledge levels, skills, advanced statistical methods

Анотація

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of cognitive knowledge levels of senior students studying in higher education on various variables and some performance-based skills. 265 students selected by criterion sampling method participated in the study. The validity and reliability of the data of the study were determined, collected with two separate inventories, and various advanced statistical methods were used in the analysis of the data. According to some variables, it has been determined that knowledge levels have a significant effect on some performance-based skills. The obtained data were interpreted in the light of the literature and various suggestions were made to researchers and practitioners.

Біографії авторів

  • автор Abbas Doğan, афіліація Ministry of National Education, Turkey
    Abbas Dogan works as a Branch Manager at the Ministry of National Education and holds a PhD in Educational Administration and Supervision.
  • автор Reyhan Sekerci, афіліація Dr., Ministry of National Education, Turkey
    Reyhan Sekerci (PhD) works as a Class Teacher at Konyaaltı Primary School. Her research publications and research interests: teacher leadership, mobbing, comparative education, classroom management, informal education, adult education, adult learning lifelong learning.
  • автор Beyhan Güven, афіліація Ministry of National Education, Turkey
    Beyhan Güven works as educational administrator, holds master's degrees in the field of Educational Administration and Supervision; also, works in the Ministry of National Education.
  • автор Alper Güven, афіліація Ministry of National Education, Turkey
    Alper Güven works as educational administrator who hold master's degrees in the field of Educational Administration and Supervision; also, works in the Ministry of National Education.

Посилання

Akin, A., Abaci, R., & Cetin, B. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the metacognitive awareness inventory. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7 (2), 671.

Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado-Kloos, C., Muñoz-Organero, M., & Rodríguez-de-las-Heras, A. (2013, September). Analysing the impact of built-in and external social tools in a MOOC on educational technologies. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 5-18). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Balcı, A. (2004). Research in social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.

Bayram, N. (2017). Data analysis with SPSS in social sciences. Ezgi Bookstore.

Breines, M. R., & Gallagher, M. (2020). A return to Teacherbot: rethinking the development of educational technology at the University of Edinburgh. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-15.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Data analysis handbook in social sciences. Pegem Publishing House, Ankara.

Cabaleiro-Cerviño, G., & Vera, C. (2020). The Impact of Educational Technologies in Higher Education. GIST–Education and Learning Research Journal, 20, 155-169.

Can, A. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis. Ankara: Pegem Publishing

Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87-104.

Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., &Xie, H. (2020). Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of computer & education. Computers & Education, 103855.

Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (1999). The development of authentic educational technologies. Educational Technology, 5-16.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.

Dickson, M., Fidalgo, P., & Cairns, D. (2019). The ‘S’and ‘T’ In STEM: Integrating science and technology in education in the UAE. In Education in the United Arab Emirates (pp. 95-111). Springer, Singapore.

Dooley, K. E. (1999). Towards a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: An integrative review of educational innovation studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2(4), 35-45.

Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. National Academies Press.

Flagg, B. N. (2013). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Routledge.

Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323(5910), 69-71.

Gouvias, D., Vitsilakis, C., & Kostas, A. (2019). E-Moving forward–emerging issues regarding e-learning in non-formal education in Greece. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies.

Håkansson Lindqvist, M. (2019). School leaders’ practices for innovative use of digital technologies in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (3), 1226-1240.

Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in higher education, 15(6), 703-714.

Kalaycı, Ş. (2016). SPSS Applied multivariate statistics techniques. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.

Karasar, N. (2009). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Kol, S. (2012). Developing an attitude scale towards the use of technological equipment in pre-school education. Kastamonu Education Journal, 20 (2), 543-554.

Kuş, E. (2007). Quantitative-qualitative research techniques. 2nd Edition. Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Lai, K. W., Khaddage, F., & Knezek, G. (2013). Blending student technology experiences in formal and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 414-425.

Jack, C. (2019). Enhancing the use of Educational Technologies in the Early Years (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).

Jack, C., & Higgins, S. (2019). Embedding educational technologies in early years education. Research in learning technology, 27.

Mason J. (2002). Qualitative researching. 2nd. Ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K. And Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.

Mosenkis, I. L., Lukianyk, L. V., Strokal, O. M., Ponomarova, V. A., & Mykhailiuk, H. V. (2020). Application of cloud educational technologies for teacher competence development. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 289-303.

Nawaz, A., Awan, Z., & Ahmad, B. (2011). Integrating educational technologies in higher education of the developing countries. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(2), 1-13.

Newman, M. (2019). Book review: open and distance non-formal education in developing countries by Colin Latchem. Journal of Learning for Development-JL4D, 6(1).

Nygren, H., Nissinen, K., Hämäläinen, R., & De Wever, B. (2019). Lifelong learning: Formal, non‐formal and informal learning in the context of the use of problem‐solving skills in technology rich environments. British Journal of Educational Technology.

Patton, M., Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research. 2nd.Ed. California, USA: SagePub. Inc.

Punch, K. F., & Oancea, A. (2014). Introduction to research methods in education. Sage.

Olofsson, A. D., & Lindberg, J. O. (2012). Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching. Hershey^ ePA PA: Information Science Reference.

Roberts, C. (2008). Implementing Educational Technology in Higher Education: A Strategic Approach. Journal of Educators Online, 5(1), n1.

Rubin, H. & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2008). Pedagogical biases in educational technologies. Educational Technology, 3-11.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Siefert, B., Kelly, K., Yearta, L., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Teacher perceptions and use of technology across content areas with linguistically diverse middle school students. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 107-121.

Spector, J. M. (2013). Emerging educational technologies and research directions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 21-30.

Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649.

Teo, T., & Huang, F. (2019). Investigating the influence of individually espoused cultural values on teachers’ intentions to use educational technologies in Chinese universities. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5-6), 813-829.

Turgut, Y. (2009). Data recording, analysis, interpretation: quantitative and qualitative. Tanrıöğen, A., (Ed.), Scientific research methods. (p. 193-247). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Ugur, N. G. (2020). Digitalization in higher education: A qualitative approach. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(1), 18-25.

Uncapher, M. R. (2019). Design considerations for conducting large‐scale learning research using innovative technologies in schools. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(1), 62-69.

Vaganova, O. I. (2019). Organization of practical classes in a higher educational institution using modern educational technologies. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 81-86.

Vovk, M. P., Sotska, H. I., Trynus, O. V., & Muzyka, O. J. (2019). Assessment of instructors' technology competency to be used in the settings of formal and non-formal education. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5), 29-44.

Ziguras, C. (2001). Educational technology in transnational higher education in South East Asia: the cultural politics of flexible learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 4(4), 8-18.

Завантаження

Опубліковано

2021-07-09

Номер

Том 6 № 1 (2021)

Розділ

Articles

Ліцензія

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).