COMPLEMENTARY LAW IN GRAMMAR-TRANSLATION METHOD

Authors

  • Ching-Chung Guey Department of Applied English, I-Shou University, Taiwan, ROC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.1208

Keywords:

grammar translation method, EFL instruction, trigram, hexagram, complementary law

Abstract

This paper intends to analyze the Grammar-Translation Method (GTM) on the basis of the perspectives of Complementary Law from Hexagram in Chinese I-Ching, and to answer the 3 questions regarding GTM: 1). Is the combination of Teacher and Student in GTM settings optimal? 2) Is the combination of Material and Methodology in GTM settings optimal? 3)  Is the combination of Objective and Assessment in GTM settings optimal? This paper starts with the analysis of the six variables (in three pairs) involved in GTM settings; namely, teacher-student, objective-assessment, and material-methodology. Each of these variables was specified as yin or yang, depending on its individual feature, and then was examined through the Complementary Law of Chinese I-Ching. The results indicate that the overall effect of GTM is less desirable than expected, as there are two imbalances that exist between Methodology-Material, and between Assessment and Objective. Suggested solutions include replacing behavioral mode of instruction with a constructivist one in Methodology, or to changing product-oriented assessment into process-oriented one in GTM settings. As I-Ching was originally developed as a qualitative interpretation, more empirical validation of its accuracy and application is needed. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Al Refaai, K.I., 2013. Suggested guidelines for using translation in foreign language learning and teaching. Educational Research (ISSN: 2141-5161) January 2013. International Research Journals. 4(1): 12- 20. Available from http://www.interesjournals.org/ER Chang, S.C., 2011. A contrastive study of grammar translation method and communicative approach in teaching English grammar. ELT, 4(2): 13-24

Giang, Z. T. (2005). Yixue Xinlixue (Psychology of I-Ching). Shanghai: Sanlianc Publication.

Guey, C. C. (2012). A Tentative Model on Emotions under Various Levels of Tension in Learning: Perspectives from Chinese I-Ching, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(4), 272-289.

Guey, C. C. (2014). A Study of Instructional Psychology on Grammar-Translation Method from Chinese I-Ching. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences. Volume 9, Number 1, 2014, 22-33.

Huang, A. (2000). The Numerology of the I-Ching: A Sourcebook of Symbols, Structures, and Traditional Wisdom. Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions International.

Mondal, K.N., 2012. English language learning through the combination of grammar translation method and communicative language teaching. Academia Arena, 4(6): 20-24. Available from www.sciencepub.net.

Oxford, R. L., Ehrman, M. E., & Lavine, R. Z. (1991). Style wars: Teacher-student style conflicts in the language classroom. In S. S. Magnan (Ed.), Challenges in the 1990s for college, foreign language programs (pp. 1-25). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2017-11-21

Issue

Section

Articles