THE IMPACT OF STORYTELLING ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ORAL PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.1770Keywords:
impact, oral performance, storytelling, studentsAbstract
This paper examines the impact of storytelling on high school students’ oral performance and their attitudes towards this instruction. Using an experimental mixed methods design, pretests, posttests, and interviews were undertaken with thirty six students in the pilot class of academic years 2017-2018. The findings of the study indicate that these participating students were in favor of learning with storytelling rather than other ways. The quantitative analysis reveals that students in the experimental group outperformed those in the control group, suggesting that storytelling instruction was useful to high school students using the pilot textbooks. Pedagogical implications are also presented.
References
Agosto, D. E. (2013). If I had three wishes: The educational and social/ emotional benefits of oral storytelling. Storytelling, Self, Society, 9(1), 53-76.
Behmer, S. (2005). Literature review digital storytelling: Examining the process with middle school students. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Arizona, USA.
Berkowitz, D. (2011). Oral storytelling: Building community through dialogue, engagement, and problem solving. Young Children, 6(2), 36-40.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bygate, M. (2010). Speaking (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chancellor, R., & Lee, S. (2016). Storytelling, oral history, and building the library community. Storytelling, Self, Society, 12(1), 39-54.
Do, N. T. N., & Nguyen, H. B. (2017). Drama-based role play activities to impact on students' speaking performance. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 7, 91-99.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3-34). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Faircloth, G. (2009). A qualitative study counterstorytelling: A counter-narrative of literacy education for African-American males. (PhD), Miami University.
Farris, P. J. (1993). Language arts: Process approach. Ilinois, US: Brown and Benchmark Publications.
Fawcett, S. E., & Fawcett, A. M. (2011). The living case: Structuring storytelling to increase student interest, interaction, and learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(2), 287-298.
Forest, H. (2010). Storyworlds in the classroom. Storytelling, Self, Society, 6(3), 245-249.
Gere, J., Kozlovich, B.-A., & Kelin, D. A. (2002). By word of mouth: A storytelling guide for the classroom. Honolulu, Hawaii: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J.-L., Huang, Y.-M., Hsu, G.-L., & Lin, Y.-C. (2016). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 215-241.
Johnson, H., & Freedman, L. (2001). Using adolescents' oral and written narratives to create classroom communities. Middle School Journal, 32(5), 35-44.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1985). Student-student interaction: Ignored but powerful. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 22-26. doi: 10.1177/002248718503600406
Livo, N. J., & Rietz, S. A. (1986). Storytelling: Process and practice. Littleton, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
Lwin, S. M. (2017). Narrativity and creativity in oral storytelling: Co-constructing a story with the audience. Language and Literature, 26(1), 34-53.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marzuki, Prayogo, J. A., & Wahyudi, A. (2016). Improving the EFL learners' speaking ability through interactive storytelling. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(1), 15-34.
Massa, E. (2016). Stories of words, words as stories. Some lexico-statistically based reflections on the meaning unit in spoken language. Linguistik Online, 75(1), 103-142.
Mello, R. (2001). Building bridges: How storytelling influences teacher and student relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 17(6), 301-307.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2008). Teaching and learning foreign languages in the national education system from 2008 to 2020. Hanoi: Vietnam Retrieved from Retrieved from http://tailieu.vn/doc/de-an-day-va-hoc-ngoai-ngu-trong-he-thong-giao-duc-quoc-dan-1331102.html.
Mokhtar, N. H., Halim, M. F. A., & Kamarulzaman, S. Z. S. (2011). The effectiveness of storytelling in enhancing communicative skills. Social and Behavioral Science, 18, 163-169.
Nguyen, H. B., & Do, N. T. N. (2017). Students' attitudes towards drama-based role play in oral performance. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2(3), 30-47.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice: Cambridge University Press.
Samantaray, P. (2014). Use of storytelling method to develop spoken English skill. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 40-44.
Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1(6), 1-21.
Thang, Q. T. (2017). Teaching proficiency through reading and storytelling: The impact of preschoolers' oral retelling. (Master), Can Tho University, Can Tho.
Zare-Behtash, E., Saed, A., & Sajjadi, F. (2016). The effect of storytelling technique on speaking ability of female Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(1), 209-214.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
