TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP STRATEGY USE AMONG GOOD AND POOR READERS IN EFL READING COMPREHENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.2277Keywords:
EFL, English reading strategy use, top-down strategies, bottom-up strategiesAbstract
This study revealed the readers’ use of top-down and bottom-up strategies in EFL learning context in Taiwan. The participants, 111 undergraduates EFL learners, were classified into good and poor readers. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a questionnaire and interviews. The results showed that almost no difference was confirmed between good and poor readers in bottom-up and total strategy use, whereas it was found that good readers tended to use more top-down strategies than poor readers. It is suggested that both groups of readers use bottom-up strategies to a similar degree; however, the use of top-down strategies has helped good readers advance their level of reading comprehension.
Article visualizations:
References
Andrews, S., & Bond, R. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top- down processing of lexical ambiguity. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(6), 687-711
Bensoussan, M. (1998). Schema effects in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading. 21(3), 213-227.
Dehghan, F., & Sadighi, F. (2011). On the cultural schema and Iranian EFL learners’ reading performance: A case of local and global items. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 97-108.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126-135.
Gowie, C. (1978). Psycholinguistic strategies for improving reading comprehension. The Elementary School Journal, 79(2), 67-73.
Kurby, C. A., & Britt, M. A., & Magliano, J. P. (2005). The role of top-down and bottom- up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 26(4-5) 335-362.
Nagao, H. (2002). Guides - classroom - teacher. Using top-down skills to increase reading comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED475744)
Pang, J. (2008). Research on good and poor reader characteristics: Implications for L2 reading research in China. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(1), 1-18.
Sheridan, E. M. (1978). Information analyses: Guides - classroom – teacher. A Review of research on schema theory and its implications for reading instruction in secondary reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED167947)
Smith, F. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (6th ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wilson, J. J. (2008). How to teach listening. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Zhao, X., & Zhu, L. (2012). Schema theory and college English reading teaching. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 111-117.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


