USING CREATIVE DRAMA ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS OF STUDENT TEACHERS / ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÜSTBILIŞSEL FARKINDALIKLARINI GELIŞTIRMEKTE YARATICI DRAMA KULLANIMI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.2492Keywords:
metacognitive awareness, creative drama, English language teacher education, student teachers / üstbilişsel farkındalık, yaratıcı drama, İngilizce öğretmeni eğitimi, öğretmen adayıAbstract
This study investigated the effects of creative drama on metacognitive awareness of student teachers studying English Language Teaching. Before and after a 30-hour creative drama workshop, they taught one lesson which was observed and video-recorded by the researcher, participated in stimulated recall sessions, and filled in the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Teachers (MAIT). Additionally, group discussions were recorded throughout the workshop. The content analysis of qualitative data from observations, stimulated recall and discussions led to the categorization of metacognitive awareness into three categories: metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive regulation, and metacognitive experience. Also, the quantitative analysis of the MAIT revealed a significant difference in their metacognitive awareness. As a conclusion, integration of creative drama activities into teacher education was discussed.
Bu çalışma, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümünde okuyan öğretmen adaylarının üstbilişsel farkındalıklarını geliştirmekte yaratıcı dramanın etkilerini araştırmaktadır. 30 saatlik yaratıcı drama atölyesinin öncesinde ve sonrasında, katılımcılar araştırmacının da gözlemleyip video kaydı yaptığı bir ders anlatımı yapmış, uyarıcılı hatırlatma seanslarına katılmış, ve Öğretmenler için Üstbilişsel Farkındalık Envanterini (MAIT) doldurmuşlardır. Ayrıca, grup tartışmaları da tüm atölyeler boyunca kaydedilmiştir. Gözlemler, uyarıcılı hatırlatmalar ve tartışmalardan gelen nitel verinin içerik analizi sonuçlarına göre üstbilişsel farkındalık üç kategoriye ayrılmıştır: Üstbilişsel bilgi, üstbilişsel düzenleme ve üstbilişsel deneyim. MAIT’ten gelen nicel veri analizi sonuçları da üstbilişsel farkındalıklarında önemli bir fark olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak, yaratıcı drama aktivitelerinin öğretmen eğitimine yedirilmesi gerekliliği tartışılmıştır.
Article visualizations:
References
Adıgüzel, Ö. (2012). Eğitimde yaratıcı drama [Creative Drama in Education]. Ankara, Turkey: Naturel.
Alkan, F., & Erdem, E. (2014). The relationship between metacognitive awareness, teacher self-efficacy and chemistry competency perceptions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 778-783. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.475
Balçıkanlı, C. (2011). Metacognitive awareness for teachers (MAIT). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1309-1332. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ960147
Baldwin, P. (2012). With drama in mind: Real learning in imagined worlds. London/New York: Continuum.
Batha, K., & Carroll, M. (2007). Metacognitive training aids decision making. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59(2), 64-69. Doi: 10.1080/00049530601148371
Baylor, A. L. (2002). Expanding pre-service teachers’ metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents. ETR&D, 50(2), 5-22. Doi: 10.1007/BF02504991
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In, E. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Souto-Manning, M. (2010). Teachers act up! Creating multi-cultural learning communities through theatre. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Çakır, A., & Balçıkanlı, C. (2012). The use of the EPOSTL to foster teacher autonomy: ELT student teachers’ and teacher trainers’ views. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 1-18. Doi: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n3.7
Cohen, Louis, Manion, L., & K. Morrison. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London/New York: Routledge.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognition aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Hacker, D. J. (1998). Metacognition: definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky and C. A. Graesser, (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hartman, H. J. (2001). Teaching metacognitively. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: theory, research and practice (pp. 149-169) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Heathcote, D. (1984). Collected writings. London, England: Hutchinson.
Horasan Doğan, S., & Özdemir Şimşek, P. (2017). Improving metacognitive awareness through creative drama. Bartin University, Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(3), 804-816.
Johnson, C. (2002). Drama and metacognition. Early Child Development and Care, 172(6), 595-602. Doi: 10.1080/03004430215101
Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Animal mind—human mind (pp. 201–224). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lee, B. K., Patall, E. A., Cawthon, S. W., & Steingut, R. R. (2015). The effect of dram-based pedagogy on PreK-16 outcomes: A meta-analysis of research from 1985 to 2012. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 3-49. doi: 10.3102/0034654314540477
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181. Doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6
Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2006). Precursors of metamemory in young children: The role of theory of mind and metacognitive vocabulary. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 15–31. Doi: 10.1007/s11409-006-6585-9
McCaslin, N. (2006). Creative drama in the classroom and beyond. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
McGrath, I. (2000). Teacher autonomy. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath & T. Lamb, Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy, future directions. (pp. 100-109). Pearson Education Limited: Essex.
Nahrkhalaji, S. S. (2014). EFL teachers’ metacognitive awareness as a predictor of their professional success. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic and Management Engineering, 8(6), 1656-1660. Retrieved from scholar.waset.org/1307-6892/9998414
O’Hanlon, J., & Wootten, A. (2007). Using drama to teach personal, social, and emotional skills. London, England: Paul Chapman Publishing.
O’Neill, C., & Lambert, A. (1987). Drama structures: A practical handbook for teachers. Hutchinson, London.
Okoza, J., & Aluede, O. (2014) Fostering metacognitive awareness among teachers: Implications for the Nigerian school system. Africa Education Review, 11(4), 614-637. Doi: 10.1080/18146627.2014.935006
Paris, S., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones and L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching & assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 220-227. Doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
Schön, D. A. (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive knowledge awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1–2), 113–125. Doi: 10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schraw, G. & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. Doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychological Review, 7, 351–371. Doi: 10.1007/BF02212307
Selçioğlu Demirsöz, E. (2012). Effects of creative drama on metacognitive awareness of the teacher trainees. Creative Drama Journal, (7)14, 63-79. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/ydrama/issue/23809/253689
Smyth, J. (1992). Teachers’ work and the politics of reflection. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 267-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029002268
Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306
Tobias, S., & Everson, H. J. (2002). Knowing what you know and what you do not: further research on metacognitive knowledge monitoring. College Board Research Report 2002–3. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B., & Afflerback, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological consideration. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. Doi: 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63-85. Doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1
Wiezbicki-Stevens, K. (2009). Metacognition: Developing self-knowledge through guided reflection. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationship and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 269–288. Doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9062-4
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1477457
Zohar, A. (1999). Teachers' metacognitive knowledge and the instruction of higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 413–429. Doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00063-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


