SOME PROBLEMS OF GRAMMATICAL AGREEMENT IN WRITTEN PRODUCTIONS OF SCIENCE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.2509Keywords:
grammatical agreement, usage problems, second language learnersAbstract
Concord, also termed Agreement in English grammar, is an indispensable sentential element in daily language use. So its knowledge is instrumental to meaningful learned communication. A major type is subject-verb concord which has attracted detailed description in grammar and adequate focus in empirical studies on the usage problems of learners of English as a second language particularly at the tertiary school level in Nigeria. But other concord types have not had sufficient focus in such research works. The purpose of the study is to describe the other concord types using structural grammar approach and investigate the difficulties with their usage in the written productions of some science undergraduate students. The study subjects are two hundred and eighty-six students randomly drawn from among first-year students of an academic session in University of Agriculture, Makurdi. A research instrument, which has both essay- writing task and objective test, was administered to the students at the close of the session when they had had a use of English course, called Communication in English. Frequency and percentage statistical tools, in addition to extracts from the students’ works, are used to analyze the data. The findings show that the students construct sentences devoid of the following concord relationships: subject-complement, object-complement, distributive-number, pronoun-antecedent and concord of person. The identified linguistic incompetence adversely affects their communication in English. It is therefore recommended that the concord types studied here should be adequately taught and accompanied with sufficient practice exercises at the level of the English course for first-year university students so that they can gain mastery in the use of the items in communication.
Article visualizations:
References
Agbo, I, I., G. C. Kadiri & B. U. Ijem (2018). Assessing problem areas in senior secondary students’ use of the English concord. Theory and practice in Language studies, vol 8, pp. 973-981, August 2018
Alterberg, E. & V. M. Robert.(2010) English grammar: Understanding the basics. Cambridge; University press
Ansell, M. (2000). Free online English grammar. www.seyfihoa.com. Retrieved on 6 November, 2011.
Azar, B. S. (1999). Fundamentals of English grammar. New York: Pearson Education Limited.
Azar, B. S. (1999). Understanding and using English grammar. New York: Pearson Education
Azar, B. S. (2003). Fundamentals of English grammar. New York: Pearson Education
Berry, R. (2012). English: An essential grammar. Oxon: Routledge
Close, R. A. (1981). A reference grammar for students of English. England: Longman Group Limited.
Digby, B. & J. Granger (1998). The Heinemann ELT. English grammar: Oxford: Macmillan publisher
Eastwood, J. (2002). Oxford Guide English Grammar Oxford: Oxford university press
Gerald, N. (2002). English: An essential Grammar. London: Routledge
Greenbaum, S. & G. Nelson (2002) An introduction to English. London: Pearson Education Limited
Greenbaum, S. (1996) The Oxford English grammar. Oxford: Oxford university press
Huddleston, R. & G. Pullum (2005) A students introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge university press
Leech, G. and J. Svartvik (2002). A communicative grammar of English. England: Pearson education Limited
Lester, M. (2008). Essential ESL grammar: A handbook for intermediate & advanced ESL students. New York: McGraw Hill
Oludare, O., J. (2016) “Concord Errors in postgraduates’ dissertations and theses”. International Journal of English Language & Literature studies
Quirk, R. & and S. Greenbaum (1976). A university grammar of English. London: Longman Group Limited.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum., G. Leech. & J. Svartvik. (2007). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Swan, M. & C., Walter (2000). How English works; A grammar practice book. Oxford: Oxford university press
Teschner, R. V. & E. E. Evans (2007). Analyzing the grammar of English Washington DC: Georgian university press
Thomson A. J. & A. V. Martinent (1986) A practical English grammar. oxford: Oxford University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


