CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN LANGUAGE CLASS OF ARCHITECTURE – A CASE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.2788Abstract
Arousal of intellectual curiosity enhances the desire to learn. When students apply reasoning and use evidence to solve problems, they start working in the cognitive and metacognitive realms. This may lead to an organized and focused inquiry followed by questions and divergent views. English classrooms have ample opportunities to improve the quality of thought when tasks are designed using reading and listening materials. While concentrating on language skills, emphasis is given to critical thinking. Moving away from factual knowledge, the students will have opportunities to make intellectual moves, reason well and offer solutions to the problems. Using a listening or a passage, the task should be designed which would combine ideas and information in a new way that would lead to discussions based on the 4Cs communication, creativity, collaboration, and critical thought. The paper focuses on the need of inculcating ‘thinking' in the 21st century learners.
Article visualizations:
References
Beyer, B. (1985). Critical thinking: What is it? Social Education, 49(4): 270–276.
Abrami, C. et al. (2014). Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research June 2015, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 275–314 DOI: 10.3102/0034654314551063 © 2014 AERA.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Crockett, L. W. (2016). The Critical Thinking Skills [Infographic] https://globaldigitalcitizen.org/critical-thinking-skills-cheatsheet-infographic
Davies, M., Barnett, R. (Eds.) (2015) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education, Palgrave Macmillan.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
Nadir Çeliköz & et al. (2019). Cognitive Learning Theories with Emphasis on Latent Learning, Gestalt and Information Processing Theories, Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, August 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 3.
Peter A. F., & Noreen C. F. (1995). The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking,” Journal of General Education 44(1) 1–25.
Richard Paul and Linda Elder (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools, Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2013). Study of 38 Public Universities and 28 Private Universities to Determine Faculty Emphasis on Critical Thinking in Instruction. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/study-of-38-public-universities-and-28-private-universities-to--faculty-determineemphasis-on-critical-thinking-in-instruction/598#top.
Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237-249.
Scriven, M. and Paul, R. 2007. Defining critical thinking Retrieved November 27, 2009, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/define_critical_thinking.cfm.
Tom Destiny, The Socratic Method UCU 103.
https://www.facebook.com › posts › the-socratic-methoddr-tom-destiny-nam...
Willingham, D. (2007). Critical thinking: why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, pp. 8–19. www.aft.org//sites/default/files/periodicals/Crit_Thinking.pdf p. 11.
Wilson, K., & Devereux, L. (2014). Scaffolding theory: High challenge, high support in Academic Language and Learning (ALL) contexts. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(3), A91–100.
Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Thinking Skills and Creativity 22, 256–265.
Simple and Effective Critical Thinking Strategies That Really Work https://www.wabisabilearning.com/blog/7-critical-thinking-strategies.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yildirim B., Özkahraman S. (2011). Critical thinking in nursing process and education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1: 257-262.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


