THE SIOP MODEL AS AN EMPOWERING TEACHING METHOD FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS - A STUDY CASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i2.3451Keywords:
The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Model, English language learners (ELLs), English language proficiency (ELP), mainstream class, SIOP classAbstract
The increase in the needs of the English language learners (ELLs) and their endless demands in terms of achievement and proficiency in all the educational systems all over the world urged teachers and educators to call for new teaching strategies that sound more adequate and appropriate in the classroom. The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Model emerged as one of the worldwide prominent teaching methods that guarantee the ELLs success, especially when it has to do with the understanding of the content and language learning meanwhile. With its diverse culture and prominent engagement in terms of education, Morocco represents a fertile field for the implementation of the SIOP Model that has proven in different contexts its adequacy in helping ELLs achieve proficiency. This study is about a quasi-experimental research that is implemented in an urban school known for its diversification in terms of mother tongue, socio-economic status, gender, and background. Given these different circumstances of the learners, the findings reported after the adoption of the SIOP Model as a teaching approach showed that it is a reliable and adequate teaching method in terms of content and language proficiency. The use of wh-questions as key indicators to measure the learners’ capacity of understanding and responding correctly throughout the experiment phase showed the superiority of the ELLs in the SIOP classes in contrast to the learners in the mainstream classes. This superiority is embodied, especially in terms of the high scores obtained in providing correct answers in a short duration of time.
Article visualizations:
References
Bloom, L., Merkin, S., & Wootten, J. (1982). Wh-questions: Linguistic factors that contribute to the sequence of acquisition. Child Development, 53, 1084-1092. Reprinted in Bloom, L., (1992). Language development from two to three. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242-256.
Collier, V. P. (1995). Acquiring a second language for school: Directions in language and education. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Vol. 1, No. 4, Fall 1995. Retrieved from http://cmmr.usc.edu/501HakutaCollierReadings/CollierThomas_Acquiring_L2_for_School.pdf.
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121-129.
Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (2003). Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English Language Learners with Diverse Abilities. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Pearson Publishers.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2004). Making content comprehensible for English learners : The SIOP model (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Echevarria, J., & Vogt, M. E. (2008). 99 Ideas and Activities for Teaching English Learners with the SIOP Model. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Echevarria, J., Short, D., and Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4): 195-210. Retrieved from http://edfs200ell.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/54561001/EchevarriaShort-SchRefSBEELLs.pdf.
Echevarria, J., & Colburn, A. (2006). Designing lessons: Inquiry approach to science using the SIOP Model. In A. Lathman & D. Crowther, (Eds.), Science for English language learners (pp. 95–108). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2007). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon. Retrieved from http://www.schtools.com/membersnew/documents/MSSAA/14-15LLP-SEI_SIOP.pdf.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2008). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Echevarria, J., & Short, D. J. (2010). Programs and practices for effective sheltered content instruction. ResearchGate.
Echevarria, J., & Vogt, M. E. (2010). Using the SIOP model to improve literacy for English learners. The NERA Journal, 46(1), 8-15. Retrieved from http://msmiddletonsclassroom.weebly.com/uploads/5/4/3/6/54366123/siop_model_for_ells.pdf.
García, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 371–392.
Hakuta, K., Butler, G. Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency ? University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Policy Report 2000-1. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucmerced.edu/khakuta/research/publications/(2000)%20-%20HOW%20LONG%20DOES%20IT%20TAKE%20ENGLISH%20LEARNERS%20TO%20ATTAIN%20PR.pdf.
Howard, E. R., Sugarma, J., & Coburn, C. (2006). Adapting the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) for Two-Way Immersion Education: An introduction to the TWIOP. Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/twi/TWIOP.pdf.
Nichols, S. L. (2012). Examining the effect of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol model on the reading comprehension of first grade students. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3929&context=etd.
Rowland, C. F., Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V., and Theakston, A. L. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14513470.
Saunders, W., Goldenberg, C., & Marcelletti, D. (2013). English language development: Guidelines for instruction. American Educator, 37(2), 13-25. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Saunders_Goldenberg_Marcelletti.pdf.
Short, D. J., & Echevarria, J. (1999). The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol : A tool for teacher-researcher collaboration and professional development. Santa Cruz, CA : Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/siop/pdfs/digests/sheltered-instruction-observation-protocol.pdf.
Short, D. J., Echevarria, J., & Richards-Tutor, C. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15(3) 363–380. Doi : 10.1177/1362168811401155.
Short, D., J., Fidelman, C., G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in English language learners through Sheltered Instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2) : 234-361. Doi : 10.1002/tesq.20.
USQ (2016). What is English proficiency? Retrieved from https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/161460PL.
Withycombe, A. C. (2014). An exploration of the role of English language proficiency in academic achievement. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Educational Methodology, Policy, and Leadership and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon). Retrieved from https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/18726/Withycombe_oregon_0171A_11164.pdf;sequence=1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


