EFL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY: CURRENT PRACTICES AT A CENTER OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES IN VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v8i2.4801Paraules clau:
proficiency, competence, EFL teachers, quality, standardized testsResum
Teachers with a high level of target language proficiency are believed to be more self-efficacious and more competent to provide good models of language usage and to undertake various teaching tasks in the target language effectively. Having a good command of English is a necessary qualification for successful teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL). In the Vietnamese teaching and learning context, EFL teachers are required to have proper professional qualifications, and English proficiency is an important quality for teaching effectiveness. With the aim to examine teachers’ perceptions towards English proficiency, this descriptive study was conducted with 33 EFL teachers at a center of foreign languages through an online survey. The results showed that teachers recognized the necessity of having English qualifications and had positive perceptions towards the English proficiency requirements. The study is beneficial for both teachers and educational administrators to have an insight into the importance of language proficiency for teaching quality. Important recommendations for successful proficiency development were also discussed.
Article visualizations:
Referències
Coniam, D., Falvey, P., & Xiao, Y. (2017). An Investigation of the impact on Hong Kong’s English language teaching profession of the language proficiency assessment for teachers of English (LPATE). RELC Journal, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882166874
Fan, J., & Yan, X. (2017). From test performance to language use: Using self-assessment to validate a high-stakes English proficiency test. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0327-4
Franz, J., & Teo, A. (2018). ‘A2 is Normal’ – Thai secondary school English teachers’ encounters with the CEFR. RELC Journal, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738816
Goodwin, R. (2018). Language proficiency and students’ behavior in the classroom: A comparative study. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 8(1), 83-95. https://mjltm.org/article-1-208-en.pdf
Ilhan, M., Guler, N., & Teker, G. T. (2021). Views of teachers on the potential negative effects of high stake tests. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 394-408. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.735232
Irdiyansyah, I., & Rizki, T. (2018). Teachers’ perspective on standardized test. Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 2(1), 18-21.
Kasumi, H. (2015). Teacher’s proficiency, and the communicative approach in enhancing students’ performance in English language learning. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(3), 53-59. https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejls_v1_i3_15/Hysen.pdf
Le, V. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2017). Teachers’ English proficiency and classroom language use: A conversation analysis study. RELC Journal, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690935
Le, X. M., & Le, T. T. (2022). English language teaching pedagogical reforms in Vietnam: External factors in light of teachers’ backgrounds.
Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2087457
Ly, T. B. P., & Le T. T. (2022). English teachers’ satisfaction with the quality of general English proficiency training program: The case of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(6), 100-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i6.4576
Masduki, A., Poedjiastutie, D., & Prabowo, C. G. (2022). Teachers' English level proficiency: Do students perceive it as a threat or a chance? Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 72-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.5
Nugroho, H. A. (2018). EFL teachers’ need of language proficiency professional development: When policy and practice collide. International Journal of language Education, 2(2), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.26858.v2i2.6373
Pham, T. H. N. (2018). General English proficiency or English for teaching? The preferences of in-service teachers. RELC Journal, 49(3), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882176914
Rachmawati, D, L., & Purwati, O. (2021). Linking language proficiency to teaching competence: A case study of EFL teachers in Indonesia. Journal of English Language Studies, 3(3), 163-173. https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/elsya/article/download/6693/3124/
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Nurkamto, J. (2018). English language proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and prospects. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 618-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618
Richards, J. C. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency, pedagogy and performance. RELC Journal, 48(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690059
Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2019). Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000421
Vu, H. H. (2017). Using English to teach English: Classroom English competence of English language teachers in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 33(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4115
Wang, C. (2021). The relationship between teachers' classroom English proficiency and their teaching self-efficacy in an English medium instruction context. Frontiers Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611743
Wulyani, A. N., Elgort, I., & Coxhead, A. (2019). Exploring EFL teachers’ English language proficiency: Lessons from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20217
Descàrregues
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


