WHY DO KUWAITI STUDENTS IN THE COLLEGE OF ARTS THINK THAT LEARNING ENGLISH IS BOTH DIFFICULT AND UNNECESSARY?

Authors

  • Mona S. Rashed College of Arts, English Language Unit, Kuwait University, Kuwait

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.814

Keywords:

Arts College students, survey, English language learning, obstacles, eliminating skills, factors

Abstract

The study sheds lights on the basic reasons and/or obstacles that hamper Kuwaiti students in the College of Arts/Kuwait University from advancing in English learning process in ESL classes. It, on the same level, tries to answer the question: “Why Do Kuwaiti Students in the College of Arts Think that Learning English is Both Difficult and Unnecessary?“ The study moves onto a parallel direction which focuses on the various factors that affect the full and smooth L2 acquisition. The survey was answered by about 500 students from the Arts College studying English modules (090, 141, and 142). Students answered the questions in either language; English or Arabic. They, in return, disclosed their views, suggestions, ideas and reflections about the curriculum. On the other hand, the survey results demonstrated the fact that students were discontent with the traditional methods of teaching grammar; they explained that they would want a more communicative method of integrating grammar within other L2 skills.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1998) “The culture the learner brings: A bridge or a barrier”. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds), Learning

MacIntyre, P.D; Gardner, R.C. (1994) "The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language" Language learning 44, 283-305

Vygotsky, L. Mind in Society (1978) The development of higher psychological process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA: 56-58

MacIntyre, P.D. Clement, R. Dornyei, Z. & Noels, K.A. (1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a second language: A situation model of second language confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (4), 545-562

Jarvis & Pavlenko, Scott & Aneta (2008) Cross linguistic influence in language and cognition. Abingdon: Routledge

Steinberg, F. & Horwitz, E.K. (1986) "The effects of induced anxiety on the denotative and interpretive content of second language speech" TESOL Quarterly, 20, 131-136

Holley, Freda M. and King, Janet K. (1969) "Imitation and correction un foreign language learning" New frontiers in second language learning. Editors: J. Schuman and N. Stenson. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers. Inc.

Blaire, Robert W. (Editor) (1982) innovative Approaches to Language Teaching. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Brumfit, Christopher (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching. The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Covington, M.V. (1992) Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Hirsch, J. K. & Ellis, J. B. (1996) Differences in life stress and reasons for living among college suicide ideators and non-ideators. College Student Journal: 30, 377-384

Kohn, J. P. & Frazer, G. H. (1986). An academic stress scale: Identification and rated importance of academic stressors. Psychological Reports: 59, 415-426

Alloga, J. E. & Ongori, H. (2009). An assessment of academic stress among undergraduate students: The case of University of Botswana. Educational Research and Review, 4 (2), 63-70

Nichols Johanna (1984) "Functional Theories of Grammar". Annual Review Anthropology, 13: 97 – 117

Hillocks, G., Jr. & Smith, M. W. (1991) Grammar and usage. In J. Flood, J. M. Jensen, D. Lapp &J. R. Squire (Eds) Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. (pp. 591 – 603) New York. Macmillan.

Published

2017-06-16

Issue

Section

Articles