THE USE OF METACOGNITIVE LISTENING STRATEGIES BY ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v8i1.4648Keywords:
language learning, listening, metacognitive strategies, strategy trainingAbstract
The aim of this study is to determine the use of metacognitive listening strategies by EFL (English as a foreign language) learners in the Republic of North Macedonia. The participants in the study were two groups of EFL learners at two stages of language development: intermediate and advanced, in order to determine if the use of listening strategies changes with the development of language proficiency. The instrument used in the study is the MALQ questionnaire that investigates five groups of strategies: problem-solving, planning and evaluation, mental translation, person knowledge and directed attention. The results of the study showed that the students reported having a moderate amount of metacognition with an overall mean of 4.18 for high school students and 4.26 for university students. The Directed Attention, Person knowledge and Problem-solving strategies had higher scores and indicated a high level of awareness of these strategies for both groups, while Mental translation and Planning and evaluation showed an average level of awareness. The results provide valuable information to language teachers about the types of metacognitive listening strategies used by language learners so that they can make the necessary adjustments in their teaching methodology and strategy training of their students.
Article visualizations:
References
Abromitis, B. (1994). The role of metacognition in reading comprehension: Implications for instruction. Literacy Research Report No.19. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED371291.pdf
Altuwairesh, N. (2017). EFL Saudi Undergraduate Students’ Use of Metacognitive Listening Strategies. Arab World English Journal, 8 (1). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no1.6
Baker, L & Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive skills and reading. Center for the study of reading. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED195932.pdf.
Carrell, Р. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 1- 20.
Field, J. (2008). Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT Journal, 51, 361–369.
Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. (2013). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23, 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
Li, W. (2013). Study of metacognitive awareness of non-English majors in L2 listening. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 504-510.
Nunan, D. (2002). Listening in language learning. In J. Richards, & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice (pp.238-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ölmezer Öztürk, E. (2021). An Investigation on Metacognitive Listening Strategy Use and Listening Anxiety in EFL Classrooms. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11 (2), 737-751. DOI: 10.18039/ajesi.876609
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle.
Rahimi, M., & Abedi, S. (2014). The Role of Metacognitive Awareness of Listening Strategies in Listening Proficiency: The Case of Language Learners with Different Levels of Academic Self-regulation. Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends, 169–192. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_7
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive listening strategies awareness in learning English as a foreign language: A comparison between university and high-school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 82-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.020
Rohmatika, H. I., Asiyah, S., Mustikawati, D. A., & Maghfiroh, A. (2021). Students’ metacognitive Awareness on Listening: Survey on English Department Students. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(6), 1131-1138.
Rost, M. (2001). Listening. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 7-13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.002
Taheri, P., & Zade, M. H. (2018). The contribution of metacognitive strategies to EFL learners' listening comprehension task types. Teaching English Language, 12 (2), 169-198. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2018.82864
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. M. (2012). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action. New York: Routledge.
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and Validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
Wallace, M. P. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition After Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge. Journal of Language and Education, 7(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12685
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


