THE ROLE OF INTEGRATED IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT (META) COGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES TRAINING IN REVAMPING ENGLISH (L3) READING COMPREHENSION GAINS AMONG MOROCCAN EFL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v11i1.6516کلمات کلیدی:
explicit/ implicit strategy instruction, metacognition, cognitive reading strategies, metacognitive reading strategies, reading achievementچکیده
This study, conducted for a three-month period (from October through December) in 2017, aims at putting to the test the impact of integrated implicit and explicit (meta) cognitive reading strategy instruction (IECMRSI) on Moroccan EFL high school learners’ reading achievement gains. To fulfill this stated objective, 76 high school-level students (Control Group: N=39; Treatment Group: N= 37) participated in this quasi-experimental study. The data were garnered by means of expository reading tests (the pre-test & the post-test), expository reading comprehension texts, and implicit/ explicit (meta) cognitive reading strategy training. The research outcomes attest to the robust potential held by the combined implicit and explicit reading strategy instruction in revamping the experimental groups’ reading scores across the pre- and post-tests. As for the control group, it did not manifest any tangible progress regarding the reading achievement scores. Accordingly, some actionable recommendations and insightful implications associated with the teachability of English (L3) reading comprehension at the high school level are tacitly spotlighted.
Article visualizations:
مراجع
Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063-1081. https://doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5
Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Pouralvar, K. (2018). The effect of explicit instruction of metacognitive reading strategies on ESP reading comprehension in academic settings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature (IJALEL), 7 (4), 77-86. http://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJALEL.V.7N.4P.77
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second/Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ERIC-ED463659/pdf/ERIC-ED463659.pdf
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828401500213
Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (2), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587008
Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English l2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(9), 2281–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R.J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp.453-479). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED195932.pdf
Brown, A. L. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in Reading: Research and Instruction (pp. 501-529). Washington, D.C.: National Reading Conference. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1128747
Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading Comprehension: From Research to Practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED269750
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://carrerainglesuce.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/discourse_analysis_by_gillian_brown_geor.pdf
Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct Instruction in Reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson-Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://arthurreadingworkshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/DIReading.pdf
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. New York: Longman. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833200
Derry, S. J., & Murphy, D. A. (1986). Designing systems that train learning ability: From theory to practice. Review of Educational Research, 56, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001001
Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.2.1
Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning: Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P.D., Strachan, S.L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S.J. Samuels and A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction (4th ed., pp.51-93). Newark, DE: The International Reading Association. Retrieved from https://www.readinghalloffame.org/sites/default/files/03-duke-pearson-strachan-billman.2011_rev_copy.pdf
Eskey, D. (1988). Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey, (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp. 93-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/interactive-approaches-to-second-language-reading/holding-in-the-bottom-an-interactive-approach-to-the-language-problems-of-second-language-readers/F008083D845AFE4901114C7F84595D3C
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271221
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive Monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s Oral Communication Skills. New York: Academic Press. Retrieved from https://jgregorymcverry.com/readings/flavell1979MetacognitionAndCogntiveMonitoring.pdf
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-97150-000
Gough, P. B. (1976). One second of reading. In H. Singer and R.P. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Retrieved from https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/vl/article/view/5129
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language research. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (3), 375-406. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586977
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2001). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Methods in Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 187-204). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Guo, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Williams, R. S. (2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults’ reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 159–183.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11403086
Hezam, T., Ali, J., Imtiaz, S., Saifi, M., & Islam, M. (2022). Challenges and problems of reading comprehension experienced by EFL Learners. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 1(2), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v1i2.28
Iwai, Y. (2016). The effect of explicit instruction on strategic reading in a literacy methods course. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(1), 110-118. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1106323.pdf
Jones, B. F., Palinscar, A. S., Ogle D. S., & Carr, E. G. (1987). Strategic Teaching and Learning: Cognitive Instruction in the Content Areas. Alexandra: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED286858
Kendeou, P., Van Den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of reading comprehension: Implications for reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29 (1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12025
Kern, R. G. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. The Modern Language Journal, 73(ii), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 4781.1989.tb02535.x
Kim, M. (2022). Exploring literal and inferential reading comprehension among L2 adolescent learners: The roles of working memory capacity, syllogistic inference, and L2 linguistic knowledge. Reading and Writing, 36 (2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10320-3
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2nd Revised Edition). New Delhi: New Age International. Retrieved from https://www.davcollegekanpur.ac.in/assets/ebooks/Geography/Research%20Methodology,%20Kothari.pdf
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1985). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. In H. Singer, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (3rd ed., pp.689-718). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
Lawrence, L. J. (2007). Cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies revisited: Implications for instruction. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 55-71. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1066590
Mehrpour, M., Zamaniyan, M., Sadighi, F., & Hadipourfard, E. (2022). The use of explicit and implicit instructions in teaching reading strategies and their impacts on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 1851-1864. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/6177
Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230592889
Msaddek, M. (2013). The role of metacognitive thinking in text processing. In A. Zaki, M. Najbi, & A. Chaibi (Eds.), Critical Thinking Skills in English Language Education: Proceedings of the 32nd Moroccan Association of Teachers of English Annual Conference Oujda, April 9 through 12, 2012 (pp. 41-46). Oujda: Publication of the Moroccan Association of Teachers of English (MATE). Printed by Safahate Design, Béni Mellal. Dépôt légal: 2013 M0 0221. ISBN: 978-9981-9537-3-4. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380424970_The_Role_of_Metacognitive_Thinking_in_Text_Processing_Proceedings_of_the_Moroccan_Association_of_Teachers_of_English_Critical_Thinking_Skills_in_English_Language_Education_Mate_32nd_Annual_Conference_
Msaddek, M. (2016a). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on Moroccan EFL learners’ strategy use and reading achievement. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(3), 271-285. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no3.21
Msaddek, M. (2016b). The impact of metacognitive strategy training on comprehension monitoring among Moroccan EFL university learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(4), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no4
Msaddek, M. (2023). The learnability of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in Moroccan higher education: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Education and Training (JET), 10 (2), 65-90, Macrothink Institute (MI). https://doi.org/10.5296/jet.v10i2.21164
Msaddek, M. (2024). Unveiling the causal link between monitoring strategies, instruction and EFL reading comprehension outcomes among Moroccan English Department university students: A metacognitive perspective. European Journal of Literature, Language, and Linguistics Studies (EJLLLS), 8(2), 22-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v8i2.545
Msaddek, M. (2025). Embedding Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Instruction in Tertiary Education. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved from https://cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-0364-5781-5/
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/teachingreadings0000nutt_z9a3
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14 (5), 276- 279. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00380.x?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
Reid, R., & Lienemann, T. O. (2006). Strategy Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities. New York & London: The Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/reid.pdf?t=1
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance (pp. 573-603). New York: Academic Press. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003309734-31/toward-interactive-model-reading-david-rumelhart
Samuels, S. J. & Kamil, M. L. (1988). Models of the Reading Process. In P.L. Carrell, , J. Devine, & D.E. Eskey (Eds). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. (pp. 22-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7 (4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
Schwartz, S. (1984). Measuring Reading Competence: A Theoretical- prescriptive Approach. New York & London: Plenum Press. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4899-0387-7
Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 9 (2), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0450
Smith, F. (1982). Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read (3rd edition). New York: CBS College Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Understanding-Reading-A-Psycholinguistic-Analysis-of-Reading-and-Learning-to-Read-Sixth Edition/Smith/p/book/9780415808293
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading theory. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/747348
Takallou, F. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 12, 272-300. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288619858_The_effect_of_metacognitive_strategy_instruction_on_EFL_learners'_reading_comprehension_performance_and_metacognitive_awareness
Tiruneh, D.T. (2014). The Effect of Explicit Reading Strategy Instruction on Reading Comprehension of Upper Primary Grade Students. International Journal of Education, 6, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v6i3.5989
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1065
Üstündağ-Algın, P. (2025). Explicit instruction of reading Comprehension strategies using short stories with EFL students. MEXTESOL Journal, 49(4), 1-13. Retrieved from https://www.mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=440381
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1 (1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Wang, J., Spencer, K., & Xing, M. (2009). Metacognitive Beliefs and Strategies in Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language. System, 37, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.05.001
Wood, G. (1983). Cognitive Psychology: A Skills Approach. California: Cole Publishing Company. Retrieved from https://primo.rowan.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991943693405201&context=L&vid=01ROWU_INST:ROWAN&lang=en&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=Everything&query=sub,exact,%20Psychological%20theories%20,AND&mode=advanced&offset=0
Wu, L., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2021). Supporting struggling readers at secondary school: An intervention of reading strategy instruction. Reading and Writing, 34(8), pp. 2175-2201. https://doi.org/1007/s11145-021-10144-7
Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. F. (2014). Triangulation research method as the tool of social science research. BUP Journal, 1, 154-163. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331645590_'Triangulation'_Research_Method_as_the_Tool_of_Social_Science_Research
Zhang, L. J. (2002). Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: Reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 69-94. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269710442_Exploring_EFL_reading_as_a_metacognitive_experience_Reader_awareness_and_reading_performance
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


