UNRAVELING THE USE OF COGNITIVE AND METACOGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES AMONG MOROCCAN EFL FIRST-SEMESTER UNIVERSITY LEARNERS

Auteur/ices

  • Mohammed Msaddek Associate Professor, Department of English Language & Literature, Faculty of Letters & Human Sciences-Mohammedia, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i1.5330

Mots-clés :

cognitive learning strategies, learning performance, metacognition, metacognitive learning strategies

Résumé

This study, drawing on the theory of metacognition as a lively research area in the field of educational psychology, is intended to explore the cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies (CMLSs) tapped by the English department first-semester university students in their learning practices. It is an attempt to evaluate the extent to which EFL learners resort to these ‘high-level’ heuristics for executing a diversity of learning-related tasks. To achieve this stated objective, this exploratory study targeted 63 Moroccan English department students. The data were gathered through the use of a ‘self-report questionnaire’ that addressed the learners’ recourse to (meta) cognitive learning strategies (CMLSs) along the continuum of their academic studies at the first-semester level. The outcomes reached manifestly exhibit that heavy reliance on cognitive strategies (CSs) and reduced dependency on metacognitive strategies (MSs) prototypically characterized the learners’ adopted processing modes in tackling differing learning tasks relatable to studying English as a foreign language (EFL). Hence, some actionable recommendations as well as a few limitations encountered in conducting this study are explicitly put forward.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Biographie de l'auteur

  • Mohammed Msaddek, Associate Professor, Department of English Language & Literature, Faculty of Letters & Human Sciences-Mohammedia, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco
    Mohammed Msaddek is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences- Mohammedia, Hassan II University, Casablanca. He obtained his PhD on the effect of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies (CMRSs) on Moroccan EFL university learners’ strategy use and reading achievement scores from Mohamed V University, Rabat in 2015. His main research interests incorporate metacognition, self-regulated learning, learning strategies, reading strategies, and writing strategies.

Références

Ahour, T., & Mohseni, F. (2014). The effect of metacognitive strategies (planning & monitoring) instruction on EFL learners' reading comprehension. Journal of Current Research in Science, 2 (3) 437-442.

Amiridoomari, M. (2023). Impacts of cognitive and metacognitive strategies on vocabulary learning in junior students. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 4 (11), 662-680.

Asch, M. (2002). Textbook of cognitive psychology. New Delhi: Ivy Publishing House.

Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Devecchio, E., & Anders, J. A. (1991). A developmental comparison of the effectiveness of encoding tasks. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 117 (4), 419-436.

Brezin, M. J. (1980). ECTJ/ERIC-IR young scholar paper: Cognitive monitoring: From learning theory to instructional applications. Educational Communication and Technology, 28 (4), 227-242.

Brown, A. L. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (pp.501-529). Washington, D.C.: National Reading Conference.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman.

Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12 (6), 599-607. https://doi:10.1016/S00225371(73)80039-8

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271221

Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Gu, Y. (2012). Learning strategies: Prototypical core and dimensions of variation. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3 (4), 330-356.

Hurd, S. (2008). Affect and strategy use in independent language learning. In S. Hurd and T. Lewis (Eds), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp.218-236). Bristol, Great Britain: Cromwell Press Ltd.

Liang, T. (2009). Language learning strategies: The theoretical framework and some suggestions for learner training practice. English Language Teaching, 2 (4), 199-206.

Lyke, J. A., & Kilaher Young, A. J. (2006). Cognition in context: Students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures and reported cognitive strategy use in the college classroom. Research in Higher Education, 47 (4), 477-490. https://doi:10.1007/s11162-005-9004-1

Mohammadi, M., Birjandi, P., & Maftoon, P. (2015). Learning strategy training and the shift in learners’ beliefs about language learning: A reading comprehension. Sage Open, 5(2) 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015579726

Msaddek, M. (2015). Moroccan EFL Students’ Learning of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Rabat FLHS Semester One Students as a Case Study (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

Msaddek, M. (2021). The value of metacognitive control training in enhancing Moroccan EFL learners’ reading process in tertiary education. International Journal of English Language Education (IJELE), 9(1), 42-59, Macrothink Institute (MI). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v9i1.180

Msaddek, M. (2023). Exploration of Moroccan EFL university students’ retrospective knowledge of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in processing advanced-level written discourse in English. International Research in Education (IRE), 2(11), 52-75, Macrothink Institute (MI). https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v11i2.21289

Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H.H, & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the post-secondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7-28. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20157410?seq=1

O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on acquiring English as a second language. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 133-144). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner- Manzanores, G., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (3), 557-584.

Oktoma, E., Rafli, Z., & Rahmat, A. (2020). Metacognitive learning strategies in argumentative writing skills. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3795

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Ping, H. A., & Luan, N. L. (2017). Effects of learners’ language proficiency on their language learning strategies. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 6(1), 10–25. doi:10.24200/mjll.vol6is- s1pp10-25

Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D., Elliott-Faust, D. L., & Miller, G. E. (1985). Children’s use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can’t be taught. In Pressley M., & Brainerd C. J. (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 1-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Ranjan, R., Philominraj, A., & Kumar, G. (2019). Relationship between metacognitive learning strategies and proficiency in EFL classroom in Chile. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 938-945. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.76140

Rigney, J. W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H. F. O’Neil. Jr (Ed), learning strategies (pp.165-205). New York: Academic Press.

Rubin, J. (1981). The study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, II (2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/II.2.117

Rubin, J. (1987). What the good language learners can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9 (1), 41-51.

Sadati, S., & Simin, S. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive and self-regulated learning strategies with learners’ L2 learning achievement. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4 (5), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1267

Schmitt, M. C., & Newby, T. J. (1986). Metacognition: Relevance to instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 9(4), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908316

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF022123

Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359-382.

Schuster, C., Stebner, F., Geukes, S., Jansen, M., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2023). The effects of direct and indirect training in metacognitive learning strategies on near and far transfer in self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 83, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101708

Schwartz, S. (1984). Measuring reading competence: A theoretical-prescriptive approach. New York & London: Plenum Press.

Simsek, A., & Balban, J. (2010). Learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful university students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1 (1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/5960

Stebner, F., Schuster, C., Weber, X.-L., Greiff, S., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2022). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: Effects on strategy application and content knowledge acquisition. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 715–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09322-x.

Stewart, O., & Tei, E. (1983). Some implications of metacognition for reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 27(1), 36-43.

Takač, V. C. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and second language acquisition. Clevedon, Great Britain: Cromwell Press.

Vanderstoep, S. W., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Learning to learn: The skill and will of college success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1 (1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Waldvogel, D. A. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size among adult Spanish foreign language learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 209-219. doi:10-4304/jltr.4.2.209-2019

Weinstein, C. E., & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study Strategies for life-long learning (psychology in the classroom). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537

Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2024-04-19

Numéro

Vol. 9 No 1 (2024)

Rubrique

Articles

Licence

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).