VOCABULARY SIZE AT FOUR STAGES OF LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Nina Daskalovska Goce Delcev University, Stip, Republic of North Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i2.3392

Keywords:

vocabulary size, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, isolation, context

Abstract

One of the main aims of language learning is developing communicative competence, or the ability to communicate effectively in everyday situations. In order to achieve that, besides grammar knowledge, learners need to acquire enough vocabulary knowledge that would enable them to use the language outside the classroom, which requires acquiring significant receptive and productive word knowledge in order to be able to participate in various communicative situations. Research shows that the most frequent 2000 words comprise about 85% of the words in any text regardless of the topic, and that learners need to know at least 3000 word families in order to be able to use the language successfully and to be able to read authentic texts with understanding. However, experience shows that acquiring a large vocabulary is one of the biggest obstacles that language learners face in the process of language acquisition. Nevertheless, since vocabulary knowledge is the key component of the overall communicative competence, is it necessary to invest time and effort to learn the most frequent words in the language. The aim of this study is to determine the vocabulary size of language learners at four stages of language development. In addition, the study attempts to determine the difference between receptive and productive knowledge of vocabulary, as well as the difference between knowledge of words seen in isolation and in context. The participants were four groups of learners, of whom three groups comprised elementary and secondary school students and one group were university students. The results showed that during the first five years of learning the vocabulary knowledge increases at a greater rate, that learners have better receptive than productive knowledge of words, and that seeing words in context helps learners demonstrate greater receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biography

  • Nina Daskalovska, Goce Delcev University, Stip, Republic of North Macedonia
    Nina Daskalovska is associate professor at the Faculty of Philology, Goce Delcev University in Stip, Republic of North Macedonia, where she teaches courses on English language teaching methodology. Her areas of interest include ELT methodology, vocabulary acquisition, extensive reading, and computer assisted language learning. She has published more than a hundred journal articles, book chapters, textbooks and monographs.

References

Folse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary Myths: Applying Second Language Research to Classroom Teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Goulden, R., Nation, P. & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11, 341-363.

Harmer, J. (1991). The Practice of English Language Teaching. New Edition. New York Longman.

Hatch, E. & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In: G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer and J. Williams (Eds.) Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 35-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meara, P. (1997). Models of vocabulary acquisition. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 109-121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meara, P. (2002). The Rediscovery of Vocabulary. Second Language Research, 18(4), 393-407.

Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In Schmitt, N. and McCarthy, M. (Eds.). Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Nation, I. S. P. (n.d.a). Vocabulary lists. Retrieved September 2020, from: https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/vocabulary-lists

Nation, I. S. P. (n.d.b). Measuring learners’ present level of vocabulary knowledge (vocabulary resource booklet). Retrieved May 2010, from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/nation.aspx

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Review Article: Instructed Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.

Stoddard, G. D. (1929). An experiment in verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(6), 452–457.

Waring, R. (1997). A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. Immaculata (Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama), 1, 53–68.

Waring, R. (2002). Basic Principles and Practice in Vocabulary Instruction. The Language Teacher, 26 (07).

Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Arnold.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-23

Issue

Section

Articles