ONLINE LEARNING AND ITS POTENTIAL IN DEVELOPING EFL LEARNER AUTONOMY: ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS

Автори

  • Nguyen Thi Ngoc Nhung Can Tho University, Vietnam
  • Phuong Hoang Yen Can Tho University, Vietnam

ДОИ:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i6.4610

Клучни зборови:

online learning, learner autonomy, the potentiality of online learning, students’ perception

Апстракт

Learner autonomy is now regarded as a desirable goal in tertiary education as it is found to comply with learner-centered approaches and enable students to pursue life-long learning (Sinclair, 2000a; Ciekanski, 2007). In the time of COVID-19 pandemic, the essential to conduct in-depth investigations into leaner autotomy and online learning has become more urgent, especially in the context of a university in Vietnam. This quantitative research responded to such a pressing call by exploring two aspects: (1) the students’ perception of online learning, and (3) the potentiality of online learning for developing learner autonomy. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires administered to 199 English-majored students in the context of a university in Mekong Delta. The results revealed that the students possessed positive perceptions toward online learning. Furthermore, the potentiality of online learning was explored including the ability of (1) planning learning experience, (2) evaluating learning performance, (3) determining learning goals, (4) self-controlling learning process, (5) taking responsibility for learning decision. Last but not least, this study expected that the proposed pedagogical implications will contribute to the innovation of promoting learner autonomy in online learning in the context of a university in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Биографии на авторите

  • Nguyen Thi Ngoc Nhung, Can Tho University, Vietnam

    Nguyen Thi Ngoc Nhung is an MA student of Principles and Methods in English Language Education at Can Tho University and a self-employed teacher with a bachelor’s degree of English Teacher Education at An Giang University. She is interested in doing research on teaching and learning English pronunciation, harnessing the power of technological advancements to enhance her teaching performance, and promoting learner autonomy in teaching and learning English language.

  • Phuong Hoang Yen, Can Tho University, Vietnam

    Phuong Hoang Yen is currently an associate professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Can Tho University, Vietnam. She carries studies on language teaching approaches, students’ learning autonomy, self-regulated learning strategies and teachers’ professional development.

Референци

Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., Archer, W., & Rourke, L. (2000). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts.

Barker, A. (2003). Faculty development for teaching online: Educational and technological issues. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 34(6), 273-278.

Basri, F. (2020). Factors influencing learner autonomy and autonomy support in a faculty of education. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-16.

Bast, F. (2021). Perception of Online Learning Among Students from India Set Against the Pandemic. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 705013). Frontiers Media SA.

Benson, P. (1997). Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. System, 25(4), 581-584.

Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

oud, D. (1981). Toward student responsibility for learning. In D. Boud (Ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning, (pp. 21-37). New York: Nichols Publishing Company.

Blidi, S. (2017). Collaborative learner autonomy. Springer, 10, 978-981.

Browne, E. (2005). Structural and pedagogic change in further and higher education: A case study approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(1), 49-59.

Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00008-8

Cirocki, A., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2019). Readiness for Autonomy in English Language Learning: The Case of Indonesian High School Students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 1–18.

Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Prentice Hall.

Dang, T. T. (2012). Learner autonomy: A synthesis of theory and practice. The Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society, 35(1), 52-67.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of teacher education, 61(1-2), 35-47.

Dang, T. T. (2020). Learner autonomy-promoting practices in a transition environment. Independence, 80. 5-8.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of teacher education, 61(1-2), 35-47.

Dearden, R. F. (1972). Autonomy and education. In R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst & R. S. Peters (Eds.), Education and the development of reason, (pp. 448-465). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Faize, F. A., & Nawaz, M. (2020). Evaluation and Improvement of students' satisfaction in online learning during COVID-19. Open Praxis, 12(4), 495-507.

Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (Vol. 106). Oxford, UK: Oxford university press.

Hidayati, T., & Husna, F. (2020). Learning English from Home during the COVID-19: Investigating Learners’ Experience for Online and Autonomous Learning. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 6(2), 202-217.

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon.

Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533-541.

Lazorak, O., Belkina, O., & Yaroslavova, E. (2021). Changes in student autonomy via e-learning courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(17), 209-225.

Li, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance. Computers & Education, 114, 286-297.

MOET. (2020). Công văn: hướng dẫn dạy học qua Internet, trên truyền hình đối với CSGD phổ thông, CSGD thường xuyên trong thời gian học sinh nghỉ học ở trường vì Covid-19 năm học 2019–2020 [Documentary: Guidelines for teaching via Internet, TV for general and regular education institutions during the schools’ closure by Covid-19 pandemic in 2019–2020 academic-year] (Publication No.1061/BGDDT-GDTrH). Retrieved from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/cong-van/Cong-nghe-thong-tin/Cong-van-1061-BGDDT-GDTrH-2020-day-hoc-qua-Internet-trong-thoi-gian-nghi-hoc-o-truong-vi-Covid-19-438294.aspx

Mailizar, Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics: Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1860.

Muljana, P. S., & Luo, T. (2019). Factors contributing to student retention in online learning and recommended strategies for improvement: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18.

Murphy, L. (2014). Autonomy, Social Interaction, and Community: A Distance Language Learning Perspective. In Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 119-134). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Nguyen, T. V. (2011). Language learners’ and teachers’ perceptions relating to learner autonomy-Are they ready for autonomous language learning?. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 27(1).

Nguyen, V. L. (2016). Learner autonomy in Vietnam: Insights from English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. In R. Barnard & J. Li (eds), Language Learner Autonomy: Teachers Beliefs and Practices in Asian Contexts, (pp.1-22). Cambodia: IDP Education (Cambodia) Ltd.

Ribbe, E., & Bezanilla, M. J. (2013). Scaffolding learner autonomy in online university courses. Digital Education Review, 98-112.

Samah, S. A. A., Jusoff, K., & Silong, A. D. (2009). Does spoon-feeding impede independent learning?. Canadian Social Science, 5(3), 82-90.

Serdyukova, N. K., Serdyukov, D. A., & Beliatskaya, I. (2013). Sochi market analysis as a health tourism destination. European researcher, (6-1), 1633-1640.

Sinclair, B. (1997). Learner Autonomy: The Cross-cultural Question. IATEFL Newsletter, 139, 12-13.

Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306.

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).

Trinh, Q. L. (2005). Stimulating learner autonomy in English language education: A curriculum innovation study in a Vietnamese context [Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam].

Van Lier, L. (Ed.). (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Voltz, D. (2008). Autonomy. New World Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2012 from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Autonomy?oldid=795378

Vu, C. T., Hoang, A. D., Than, V. Q., Nguyen, M. T., Dinh, V. H., Le, Q. A. T., ... & Nguyen, Y. C. (2020). Dataset of Vietnamese teachers’ perspectives and perceived support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data in brief, 31, 105788.

Zhong, D. (2018). The evolution of learner autonomy in online environments: A case study in a New Zealand context.

Преземања

Објавено

2022-12-28

Издание

Том. 7 Бр. 6 (2022)

Секција

Articles

Дозвола

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).