STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS AFFECTING COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS IN THE US EDUCATION SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v10i3.6275Palavras-chave:
English Language Learners (ELLs), Actor-Network Theory (ANT), Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), Common Core State Standards (CCSS), English Language Arts (ELA), National Research Council's (NRC), Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) Grammar TranslationResumo
The ability to use English effectively has become a critical factor for success in the modern American economy. For English language learners (ELLs), academic achievement requires more than conversational fluency; it involves acquiring advanced literacy and communication skills that allow them to engage with rigorous content, develop higher-order thinking, and participate in collaborative learning environments. The objective of this research is to examine the challenges and opportunities facing ELLs in meeting college- and career-ready standards while exploring instructional strategies that enhance their academic success. Specifically, the study seeks to understand how teachers can leverage students’ cultural and linguistic resources to support both content mastery and language development across subject areas. The methodology applied in this research draws upon a qualitative review of existing standards, instructional models, and theoretical frameworks. Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Capital serves as a guiding lens for analyzing how students’ prior knowledge, cultural background, and linguistic assets can be mobilized as strengths in the classroom. State-level standards for English Language Arts (ELA) and other disciplines were examined to identify the advanced competencies required for student progression. In addition, instructional practices such as scaffolding, sheltered instruction, and dual immersion were analyzed to determine how they address the dual challenge of language acquisition and academic content learning. Findings emphasize that teachers play a pivotal role in identifying the language demands of academic tasks and providing targeted supports. Effective strategies include scaffolding content, organizing peer interactions, and intentionally linking instruction to students’ native language skills and cultural experiences. The study underscores that states must ensure alignment among curriculum, assessment, and professional development to sustain equitable opportunities for ELLs. By integrating cultural capital into instruction, educators can foster independence, critical thinking, and readiness for postsecondary success.
Article visualizations:
Referências
Abbas, A., Aslam, M., & Abdul Majid Khan, M. (2021). Code-mixing as a communicative strategy among university-level students in Pakistan. Language in India, 11, 95-108. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3867551
Abbas, A., Nazir, M., & Rana, S. (2022). Communicative language teaching: A modified version. Language in India, 11, 331-341. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344438695_Communicative_Language_Teaching_A_Modified_Version_LANGUAGE_IN_INDIA_Strength_for_Today_and_Bright_Hope_for_Tomorrow_Communicative_Language_Teaching_A_Modified_Version
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2023). The role of formative assessments in the development of English language learners' academic language and literacy. Language and Education, 27(5), 374–398.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/e/e0/Pierre_Bourdieu_Distinction_A_Social_Critique_of_the_Judgement_of_Taste_1984.pdf
Brett, P. (2024). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 111-129). Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/contemporary-computerassisted-language-learning-9781441193629/
Bridgeland, J. M., DiIulio, J. J., & Burke, A. (2022). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Civic Enterprises. Retrieved from https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/documents/thesilentepidemic3-06final.pdf
Brown, J., & Lee, S. (2021). The effects of integrating technology in second language writing classrooms: A mixed-methods study. Computers & Education, 105, 104-116.
Carroll, J. (2023). The effects of parental literacy involvement and child reading interest on the development of emergent literacy skills. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563285
Challenges and opportunities for language learning within the framework of Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. (2021). Journal of Language and Education, 22(4), 155-170.https://doi.org/
Chen, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Integrating computer-assisted language learning into a college English course: Students’ perceptions and attitudes. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 347-358.
Council of Chief State School Officers & the English Language Proficiency/Development Framework Committee. (2022). English Language Proficiency/Development Framework for K-12 education. Council of Chief State School Officers. https://www.ccsso.org
Denton, C. A., et al. (2024). The effectiveness of professional development in teaching academic language to English learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 52-67.
Eslami, Z. (2020). Teachers' voice vs. students' voice: A needs analysis approach to English for academic purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 3-11.
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p3
Gao, X., Liu, J., & Zhang, W. (2022). Use of multimedia technology in English teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 360-370.
Gay, G. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Culturally_Responsive_Teaching.html?id=rYspC7C-zowC&redir_esc=y
Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners: Academic literacy and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Heinemann. Retrieved from https://www.heinemann.com/products/e01203.aspx
Gibbons, P. (2019). English learners: Academic literacy and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Heinemann.
González, N., et al. (2023). Pedagogical collaboration for English learners: Improving professional development for teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(4), 241-257.
Hakuta, K. (2023). Language development and academic success: Challenges and opportunities for English language learners. Harvard Education Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2022). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/book/52349
Li, L., & Ni, L. (2020). Technology-assisted language learning: A paradigm shift in English language teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 409-412.
Liu, C. (2023). Technology-enhanced language learning. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 189-206). Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Handbook_of_Technology_and_Second_La.html?id=ewEsMQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Morse, K. (2021). Building teacher efficacy in the classroom: Implications for English language learners' achievement. International Journal of Education, 7(1), 45-60.
National Governors Association Center. (2021). The Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. https://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
National Research Council. (2021). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Park, S., & Lee, Y. (2021). The characteristics of effective English teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 236-248. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ752344.pdf
Pianta, R. C. (2020). Classroom interactions and student engagement: The power of teaching and relationships. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1687097
Shishavan, H. (2020). Characteristics of an effective English language teacher as perceived by Iranian teachers and learners of English. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 130-143. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083690.pdf
Smith, L. (2022). The prototypical features of the ideal professor from the female and male undergraduate perspective: The role of verbal and nonverbal communication. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5(2), 5-22. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ539490
Smith, M., & Johnson, H. (2024). The effects of multimedia enhancement in teaching college English. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 153-165.
Sullivan, D. (2018). Using educational mobile apps to promote language learning engagement. English Language Teaching, 11(1), 133-145.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2021). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2020). The culturally responsive teacher: A guide to understanding and teaching English language learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 39-56. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268445972_The_culturally_responsive_teacher_Electronic_version
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wu, H., Li, F., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The effects of mobile-assisted language learning on English language acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 146, 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
Zamani, M., & Ahangari, S. (2019). Characteristics of an effective English language teacher (EELT) as perceived by learners of English. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4(14), 69-88. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arvind_Singh56/post/What_are_the_qualities_of_the_good_English_language_teacher/attachment/5b91801b3843b0067538216f/AS%3A667946112270336%401536262171019/download/1.pdf
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


