THE INTERACTION BETWEEN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING STRATEGIES AND EFL TEENAGER LEARNERS’ POSTCARD WRITING AT ENGLISH CENTER IN MEKONG DELTA, VIETNAM
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i5.4449##semicolon##
teenager learners##common.commaListSeparator## self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies##common.commaListSeparator## level of postcard writingAbstrakt
The current study aims at investigating the possible interaction of EFL teenage learners’ postcard writing performance (according to A2 level) and their self-regulated learning strategies at an English center. The research also helps to determine the level of interaction between EFL teenagers’ self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies and their postcard writing performance. Thus, it also examined the frequency of use of SRL strategies in writing among those learners. A total of 74 learners completed 32 items in the self-regulated learning strategies questionnaire including six dimensions of three categories namely environmental processes, behavioral processes, and personal processes. Then, three successful writers and three less successful writers were invited into the semi-structured interview. The findings indicated that SRL strategies had a positive impact on EFL teenage learners' postcard writing. The more SRL strategies used in writing, the higher the learners' score. Among these strategies, environmental factors may have a stronger influence than behavioral or personal factors. Specifically, environmental structuring and help-seeking strategies are most frequently used. The findings also showed that EFL teenage learners use SRL strategies to a moderate degree when given writing tasks. Besides, the results of the interview reveal that successful learners self-regulated better than less successful ones. They also self-evaluated their writing more frequently than those who are less successful. Based on the findings of this study, pedagogical implications and recommendations for further study are presented.
Article visualizations:
##submission.citations##
Abdikhah, S., Aliyan, Z., & Talebi, S. H. (2018). EFL students’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning strategies in academic writing. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1).
Airasian, P. W., & Russell, M. K. (2008). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (6th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Araso, K. (2008). The effects of planning instruction and self-regulation training on the writing performance of young writers with autism spectrum disorders. ProQuest.
Center for Collaborative Education. (2003). At the turning point: The young adolescent learner. Boston: Author.
Chen, F. M., & Shang, H. F. (2009). Students’ perceptions of self-regulated strategy use on EFL writing performance. English Teaching & Culture, 5, 42-53.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing system: An Introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Farsani, M. a., Beikmohammadi, M., & Mohebbi, A. (2014). Self-Regulated Learning, Goal-Oriented Learning, and Academic Writing Performance of Undergraduate Iranian EFL learners, Tesl-Ej, 18 (2), 1-19.
Graddol, D. (2004). The future of language. Science, 303 (5662), 1329-1331.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R. & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategies development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207-241.
Hammann, L. (2005). Self-regulation in academic writing tasks. International journal of teaching and learning in higher education,17 (1), 15- 26.
Honeck, A. Y. (2013). Assessing perceived writing self-efficacy beliefs in the community college environment. Masters thesis, Hamline University, USA.
Lewis, G. (2007). Teenagers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loukotková, E. (2011). Young learners and teenagers – analysis of their attitudes to English language learning. Thesis for the PhD. Brno: Masaryk University.
Magno, C. (2009). Self-regulation and approaches to learning in English composition. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228175957_Self-Regulation_and_Approaches_to_Learning_in_English_Composition_Writing
Moely, B. E., Hart, S. S., Leal, L. Santulli, K. A., Rao, N., Johnson, T., et al. (1992). The teacher’s role in facilitating memory and study strategy development in the elementary school classroom. Child Development, 63(3), 653-672.
Negari, G. M. (2011). A study on strategy instruction and EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 299.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Paris, S. G., & Newman, R. S. (1990). Developmental aspects of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 87-102.
Phuong (2014). The Impact of PPP and TBLT on Vietnamese Students' Writing Performance and Self-Regulation. Doctor thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125. Available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/w884l0214g78445h/
Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. Life Science Education, 11, 113-120.
van Den Hurk, M. (2006). The relation between self-regulated strategies and individual study time, prepared participation, and achievement in a problem-based curriculum. Active Learning in higher education, 7(2), 155-169.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-25). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4
Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: Asocial cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. American Psychological Association.
Zimmerman, B., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Reliability and validity of Self-Efficacy for Learning Form (SELF) scores of college students. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215(3), 157–163.
##submission.downloads##
Publikované
Číslo
Sekcia
##submission.license##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


