DISCREPANCY IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE SUBJECT AND ENGLISH CONTENT USED FOR SCIENCE SUBJECTS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN TANZANIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v10i3.6268Keywords:
discrepancy, English language subject, English language content, science subjectsAbstract
The mediating role of the English language in all subjects for secondary schools, except for the Kiswahili subject, is the driving factor for this study. Thus, the study sought to determine the discrepancy between the English language subject and the English content for science subjects in secondary schools. The following objectives were formulated herein: to examine the discrepancies in teaching pedagogies for English Language subjects and Science subjects in secondary schools, and to evaluate the effectiveness of language content used for English subjects and Science subjects in relation to overall Grade Point Average in examinations. A case study research design was incorporated in this study, and the qualitative research approach was dominant here, except for simple descriptive statistics used for demographic information of respondents. The study was conducted in six districts within the Mbeya region. Here, a simple random sampling technique was used for selecting schools, and the same purposive sampling method was employed for teachers and subjects taught in secondary schools. Selected English language teachers and selected Science teachers were interviewed, and classroom observation and documentary review were the primary data collection tools used for this study. Data were qualitatively analysed through coding of related information and subjecting it to themes. From the study findings, it was established that active learning, cognitive strategy, assessment and evaluation and differentiated instruction formed the basis for the discrepancy in English Language subjects and English content used for Science subjects. The findings suggest that Science subjects utilise comparatively less English content, and assessment tools for these subjects require alternative practices, such as practical items and fill-in-the-blank exercises. Therefore, there are differences in their performance.
Article visualizations:
References
Dada, S.A., Owoeye, O.K., & Ojo, G.A. (2015). The sociology of language maintenance in Nigeria. English Literature and Language Review, 1(5), 37–47. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/ellrar/2015p37-47.html
Hammond J. (2014). An Australian perspective on standards-based education, teacher knowledge, and students of English as an additional language. TESOL Quarterly 48(3): 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.173
Hashim M. (2018). Paradigm Shift in Teaching Communication Skills Course in a Tanzanian University: An Assessment and Lessons for Other Universities. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 6(5). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180605.15
Heppt, B., Haag, N., Böhme, K., & Stanat, P. (2015). The role of academic-language features for reading comprehension of language-minority students and students from low-SES families. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.83.
Kibler A.K., Walqui A., & Bunch G.C. (2014). Transformational opportunities: language and literacy instruction for English language learners in the Common Core era in the United States. TESOL Journal 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.133
Leiss, D., Domenech, M., Ehmke, T., & Schwippert, K. (2017). Schwer - schwierig - diffizil: Zum Einfluss sprachlicher Komplexität von Aufgaben auf fachliche Leistungen in der Sekundarstufe I [on the influence of tasks' language complexity on performance in secondary level I]. In D. Leiss, M. Hagena, A. Neumann, & K. Schwippert (Eds.), Mathematik und Sprache. Empirischer Forschungsstand und unterrichtliche Herausforderungen (S. 99–125). Münster: Waxmann. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319128028_Schwer_-_schwierig_-_diffizil_Zum_Einfluss_sprachlicher_Komplexitat_von_Aufgaben_auf_fachliche_Leistungen_in_der_Sekundarstufe_I
Libent, D. (2015). Determinants of Parents' Satisfaction with Quality of Pre-Primary Education in Ilala District, Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzania. Kenyatta University. Retrieved from https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/bitstreams/9e2db705-0621-4219-82a3-8d418057307c/download
Mosha A. M. (2014). Zanzibar Rural and Urban Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(35), 64–76. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/17455/17714 December 20, 2016
Mtana, N. (2013). Tanzanian Primary Schools Learners investing in English, Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Dodoma. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A634433&dswid=-5728
Mukminin, A., Haryanto, E., Sutarno, S., Sari, S. R., Marzulina, M., Hadiyanto, H., & Habibi, A. (2018). Bilingual education policy and Indonesian students’ learning strategies. Elementary Education Online, 17(3), 1204-1223. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466330
Mukminin, A., Sari, S. R., Haryanto, E., Habibi, A., Hidayat, M., Marzulina, L., Nurulanningsih, N., & Ikhsan, I. (2019). “They can speak English, but they don’t want to use it.” Teaching Contents through English in a Bilingual School and Policy Recommendations. The Qualitative Report, 24(6), 1258-1274. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss6/5
NECTA (2022). Report on National Examination Results. Retrieved from https://onlinesys.necta.go.tz/results/2022/csee/index.htm
Neri N. N. C., Guill K., & Retelsdorf J. (2019). Language in science performance: Do good readers perform better? European Journal of Psychology of Education. 36 (45-61). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00453-5
Oribabor, O. A (2014). An Evaluation of the Current English Language Curriculum in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 4 (6-8). http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p295
Peng, S. Y. (2014). Analysis of Perceived Difficulty Rank of English Skills of College Students in China. Studies in Literature and Language, 8(3), 15-21. Available from: http://www.cscanada.net/index.php/sll/article/view/5128 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/5128
Stiller, J., Hartmann, S., Mathesius, S., Straube, P., Tiemann, R., Nordmeier, V., Krüger, D., & Upmeier Zu Belzen, A. (2016). Assessing scientific reasoning: a comprehensive evaluation of item features that affect item difficulty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1164830.
Syaiful, M., A., Masbirorotni, Aina, M., Habibi, A., Sari, S. R., Harja, H., & Triana, N. (2018). Preparing future teachers in Indonesia: Motives of science and non-science student teachers for entering into teacher education programs. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 4(11), 354-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.32861/jssr.411.354.363
Terver, U. (2017). Difficult Topics and Achievement in English Language: The Perception of Senior Secondary School Students and Teachers in Makurdi Township, Benue State, Nigeria. European Journal of English Language Teaching 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.496169
The United Republic of Tanzania (2023). Population and Distribution, Ministry of Regional Administration and Local Government, Retrieved from http://www.tanzania.tz/education/html on April 10th 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


