EXAMINING OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE LEVELS AND DECISION-MAKING STRATEGIES OF BASKETBALL REFEREES IN DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATIONS

Autor/innen

  • Sait Nedim Çelik Gaziantep University, Health Science Institution, Coaching Education Department, Türkiye
  • Mustafa Ozdal Gaziantep University, Physical Education and Sport Science Faculty, Türkiye
  • Burak Karaca Gaziantep University, Health Science Institution, Physical Education and Sport Department Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v12i1.5748

Schlagwörter:

basketball refereeing, decision making strategies, psychological resilience

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the decision-making strategies and psychological resilience levels of basketball referees in different divisions. For this purpose, a total of 150 referees from classifications A, B, C, and local referees serving in Gaziantep province were included in the study on a voluntary basis. Referees who have been actively officiating for at least 2 years were included in the study. In the study, a personal information form-survey was applied to determine the division, years of service, and other characteristics of the referees. To examine decision-making styles, the Melbourne Decision Making Scale I-II was used. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale was used to measure psychological resilience. The data obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 software. The data were presented as N, arithmetic mean, and standard deviation. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied for normality testing, and the Levene test was used for homogeneity testing. In the study, independent sample t-tests were applied for binary group comparisons to determine whether there were differences in the total scale scores and subscale scores based on gender, age, years as a referee, years in the division, and the division level. For comparisons involving more than two groups, one-way ANOVA was used. The Tukey correction test was applied to determine which variable was responsible for the differences. Statistical results were evaluated at a significance level of p<0.05. As a result, we can conclude that there is a significant difference in the decision-making styles and psychological resilience levels of basketball referees in different divisions.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Autor/innen-Biografien

  • Sait Nedim Çelik, Gaziantep University, Health Science Institution, Coaching Education Department, Türkiye

    Sait Nedim Çelik is MSc student at Gaziantep University, Türkiye.

  • Mustafa Ozdal, Gaziantep University, Physical Education and Sport Science Faculty, Türkiye

    Mustafa Özdal is professor at Gaziantep University, Türkiye.

  • Burak Karaca, Gaziantep University, Health Science Institution, Physical Education and Sport Department Türkiye

    Burak Karaca is PhD student at Gaziantep University, Türkiye.

Literaturhinweise

Uzunkara, MK. "An Investigation of the Socio-Economic Structures of Basketball Referees in the Ankara Region and the Reasons for Choosing Refereeing." 2007. Master's Thesis.

Emlek, AS. "Reaction Times of Top-Class Basketball Referees." 2005. Master's Thesis, Ege University.

Karaırmak, Ö. "Establishing the Psychometric Qualities of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis in a Trauma Survivor Sample." Psychiatry Research, 2010, 179.3: 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.09.012

Ülker Tümlü, G. "An Investigation of the Contact Barriers of University Students with Different Levels of Psychological Resilience." 2012. Master's Thesis. Social Sciences Institute.

Connor KM, Davidson JR. "Development of a New Resilience Scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)." Depression and Anxiety. 2003 Sep;18(2):76-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113

Deniz, M. "A Study on the Relationship Between Self-Esteem in Decision Making, Decision-Making Styles, and Problem-Solving Skills of University Students." 2004.

Bülbül, A. "An Investigation and Comparison of Psychological Resilience Levels of Tennis and Basketball Athletes." 2015. Master's Thesis. Health Sciences Institute.

Senol, S., Can, H.O., Pektas, I. "Decision Making and Problem-Solving Skills of Midwifery Students in Turkey." HealthMED. 2012 Jan 1;6(2):560-7.

Taşdelen, A. "Decision-Making Styles of Pre-Service Teachers According to Some Psychosocial Variables." Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 2001, 10.10: 40-52.

Alver, B. "The Relationships Between Empathic Skills, Decision Strategies, and Psychological Symptoms of Employees Working in Various Public Institutions." 2003.

Avşaroğlu, S., Üre, Ö. "An Investigation of University Students' Self-Esteem, Decision Making, and Coping Styles with Stress in Terms of Self-Esteem and Some Variables." Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Selçuk University, 2007, 18: 85-100.

Çetin, MÇ. "A Comparative Study of Decision-Making Styles, Social Skill Levels, and Coping Styles with Stress of Physical Education and Sports Faculty Students in Terms of Some Variables." 2009, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Doctoral Thesis.

Gacar, A. "An Investigation of the Decision-Making and Assertiveness Levels of Physical Education and Sports Faculty Staff in Turkey in Terms of Some Variables." 2011.

Karahüseyinoğlu, F. "Reading the Decision-Making Styles of Public Managers through Their Self-Esteem Levels: The Example of Elazığ." 2013, PhD Thesis, Fırat University, Institute of Social Sciences, Elazığ.

Kelecek, S., Altıntaş, A., Aşçı, F.H. "Determining the Decision-Making Styles of Athletes." CBÜ Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2013; 8(1): 21-27.

Aktaş, N. "Motivation Sources and Decision-Making Strategies of High School Students." 2016, Master's Thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Kirgil, F. "A Study on the Decision-Making and Assertiveness Levels of Physical Education Teachers and Other Subject Teachers in Terms of Some Variables." 2015, Master's Thesis, Institute of Health Sciences.

Vural, M. "An Investigation of the Thinking and Decision-Making Styles of Sports Managers Working in the Central and Provincial Organizations of the General Directorate of Sports." 2013, Master's Thesis, Selçuk University, Konya.

Dinçer, N. "A Study on the Decision-Making Styles and Problem-Solving Skills of Sports Managers." 2013.

Deryahanoğlu, G. "An Investigation of the Impact of Decision-Making and Assertiveness Levels of Kickboxing Referees on Perceived Professional Competence." 2014, Master's Thesis, Sakarya University, Turkey.

Temel, V., Nas, K. "An Investigation of Self-Esteem and Decision-Making Levels in Sports Sciences Faculty Students." International Bozok Sports Sciences Journal. 2021; 2(1): 90-98.

Göral, K. "An Investigation of the Relationship Between the Competencies, Decision-Making Strategies, and Team Performances of Football Coaches." 2014, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Social Sciences Institute, PhD Thesis.

Diotaiuti, P., Falese, L., Mancone, S., Purromuto, F. "A Structural Model of Self-Efficacy in Handball Referees." Frontiers in Psychology. 2017 May 18; 8:811.

Kıratlı, E. "A Comparative Evaluation of the Decision-Making Styles and Empathetic Tendencies of Tennis Referees." 2015, Marmara University, Health Sciences Institute, PhD Thesis.

Demir GT, Namlı S, Hazar Z, Türkeli A, Cicioğlu Hİ. "Decision-Making Styles and Mental Well-Being Levels of Individual and Team Athletes." CBÜ Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2018;13(1):176-91.

Selvi, S. "Aggression Tendencies, Psychological Resilience, and Decision-Making Levels in Football Referees of Different Classifications: A Study in Turkey." 2018. Master's Thesis. Kocaeli University, Health Sciences Institute.

Dinç, A. "Evaluation of the Professional Competencies of Football Referees According to Their Classifications: The Example of the 10th Region." Iğdır University Journal of Social Sciences, 2017, 13: 125-150.

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2024-12-31

Ausgabe

Bd. 12 Nr. 1 (2025)

Rubrik

Articles

Lizenz

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).