PERCEPTION OF THE BEHAVIORS OF THE COACHES OF FOOTBALL, VOLLEYBALL AND BASKETBALL PLAYERS

Authors

  • Bünyamin Çayırtepe Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences, Turkey
  • Semra Çetin Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences, Turkey
  • H. Nedim Çetin Sakarya University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Turkey
  • Murat Şen Sakarya University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.1523

Keywords:

football, volleyball, basketball, detection, behavior

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the perception of the amateur football, volleyball, and basketball players and their coaches’ behaviour towards them. 100 amateur football, 60 volleyball and 62 basketball players that filled recognition survey fully are included to the study. Turkish version of Coach Behavior Rating Scale was used. One Way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) and LSD (Least Significant Difference) tests were used for statically processing. There is no significant difference found in evaluation of coach behavior of football, volleyball, and basketball players in terms of personal rapport from subscales (p>0.05). A significant difference has been revealed in the sum of scale in physical training and goal setting at p<0.05 level and technical skills, mental preparation, competition strategies, negative personal rapport, and scale total score behavior of coach at p<0.001 level. There were differences according to branches. Technical skills and competition strategies have been found in volleyball more high from amateur football and basketball players. Negative personal rapport has been found in amateur footballers lower from volleyball and basketball players. Differences have been found in detection levels of amateur footballers, volleyball, and basketball players for coaches’ behaviour against them. A very useful outcome would be for a coach to produce a “Personal Improvement Behaviors” and set goals for the next of behaviours. According to branches, the reasons of differences in detection levels of coaches’ behaviors should be determined and eliminated.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Bowes, I., & Jones, R. L. (2006). Working at the edge of chaos: Understanding coaching as a complex, interpersonal system. The sport psychologist, 20(2), 235-245.

Ermiş E., İmamoğlu O. Erilli A.N., (2016). Üniversiteli Basketbolcuların Antrenörlerinin Kendilerine Karşı Davranışlarını Algılama Düzeyi, 14th International Sport Sciences Congress, Books of Abstract, 1-4 November, Belek/Antalya/ Turkey, p.608.

Gül, M., Türkmen, M., & Ağaoğlu, S. A. (2015). The Analysis of Wrestling Coaches' Behavior towards Their Athletes in Turkey. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 5(2), 75-78.

Imamoglu, O., & Cetin, H. N. (2016). Perception of the Behaviors of the Coaches Of Elite Taekwondo Fighter, Wrestlers, And Basketball Player Against To Them. International Journal of Academic Research, 8.

Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the Coach-Athlete Relationship. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 3–14). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Koca F. (2017). "Perception of the behaviors of the coaches of elite wrestler and skiers against to them", Journal of Educatıon and Socıology, 8(1), 3-5.

Koh, K. T., Kawabata, M., & Mallett, C. J. (2014). The coaching behavior scale for sport: Factor structure examination for Singaporean youth athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 9(6), 1311-1324.

Koh, K. T., Mallett, C., & Wang, C. J. (2009). Examining the ecological validity of the coaching behavior scale (sports) for basketball. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(2), 261-272.

Lyle, J. (2002). Sports coaching concepts: A framework for coaches’ behaviour. Routledge. London, Pages.

Mallett, C., & Côté, J. (2006). Beyond winning and losing: Guidelines for evaluating high performance coaches. The Sport Psychologist, 20(2), 213-221.

Perlus, H. S. (2003). Elite Alpine Ski Racing Coaches' Achievement Goal Orientations as Predictors of Their Coaching Behavior (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).

Yapar, A., & İnce, M. L. (2014). Sporcular İçin Antrenör Davranışlarını Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması (Saddö): Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(4), 203-212.

Yardley, J., Hay, J., Sedgwick, W., & Baker, J. (1999). An exploratory examination of the coaching behavior scale for sport. Avante, 5(3), 82-92.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-28

Issue

Vol 4, No 3 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).