DEVELOPING AND DOING VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS SCALE FOR BEING NON-VOLUNTARINESS

Authors

  • Faik Ardahan Assoc. Prof. Dr. Akdeniz University, Sports Science Faculty, Recreation Department, Antalya, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.1574

Keywords:

validity and reliability, motivational factors, non-volunteer

Abstract

The main aims of this study is to define the validity and reliability for Turkish population “the Motivational Factors Scale for Being Non-voluntariness (Non-Voluntariness Scale (NVS))”, that questions why individuals who has never volunteered, participated any voluntary activity or has been volunteered before but doesn’t continue his/her voluntary life due to problems he experienced, for Turkish population. In this study, sampling consisted of 138 participants who are living in Antalya city center and never been in any volunteer organizations or joined but not sustained being as volunteer has been applied and questionnaire form has been filled by face to face method. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was done, and was performed on 24 items for NVS and the NVS were grouped into seven factors. Whether the data was suitable to this analysis, Kaiser Mayer Olkin and Bartlett Spheritiy test results were taken into consideration and then, EFA was performed. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency test was applied to the identified sub-factors and overall scale. Pearson Correlations Test was conducted to define the statistical correlation between sub-classes and items. In addition to this analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis method was performed and reached to satisfactory results in all fit indices. Results have been assessed according to significant level 0.01 and 0.05. As a result, it was founded that Cronbach’s Alpha=0.894 and total explained variance= %71.179. It can be concluded that “the Motivational Factors Scale for being Non-volunteer has reliability and validity in the estimation of the non-volunteer motivational factors for the Turkish population.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Aktepe, V. (2014). The Impact of Activity Based Value Education on Helpful Attitudes of Students. Researcher: Social Science Studies. 2(3):17-49.

Ardahan, F. (2011). Who Can Not Be A Volunteer (In Turkish: Kimler Gönüllü Olmazlar). http://www.antalyabugun.com/index.php?page=makale&MID=11246 read at 23/06/2015

Ardahan, F. (2015). Developing and Doing Validity and Reliability of the Motivational Factors Scale for being Volunteer in AKUT. International Conference on the Changing World and Social Research I. 25-28 August 2015. Vienna.

Clary, E.G. and Snyder M. (1999). The Motivations to Volunteer: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8: 156-161. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00037.

Clary, E.G, Snyder M., Copeland J.T. and French S.A (1994). Promoting Volunteerism: An Empirical Examination of the Appeal of Persuasive Messages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23 (3): 265-280.

Clary, E.G., Snyder M., Ridge, R.D., Stukas, A.A., Haugen, J. and Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74(6): 1516-1530.

Crandall, R. (1980). Motivation for leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(1): 45-54.

Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality. 19:109-134.

Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamaki, R.L. (2003). Perspective On Activity Theory, Cambiridge University Press, Second Edition, NY, 10011-4211, USA, p.22-80.

Fischer, L.R. and Schaffer, K.B. (1993). Older Volunteers: A Guide to Research and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Ibrahim, H. and Cordes, K.A. (2002). Outdoor Recreation, Enrichment For a Lifetime. Second Edition, Sagamore Publishing, Il, p. 5-150.

Levy, J. (1979). Motivation for leisure: An intereactionist approach. In H. Ibrahim and R. Crandall (Eds.), Leisure: A psychological approach. Los Alamitos, CA: Hwong Publishing, p.12-42.

Pintrich, P.R. (2000). An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory and Research, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 92–104.

Rubin, A. and Thorelli, I.M. (1984). Egoistic Motives and Longevity of Participation by Social Service Volunteers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 20 (3): 223-235.

STGM, The Civil Society Development Centre (In Turkish: Sivil Toplum Geliştirme Merkezi) (2006). Volunteering and Volunteer Management Guide for Non-Governmental Organizations (In Turkish: STK’lar İçin Gönüllülük ve Gönüllü Yönetimi Rehberi). Ankara.

Sümer N. (2000). Structural Equation Models (In Turkish: Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri). Turkish Journal of Psychology (In Turkish: Türk Psikoloji Yazıları). 3(6):49-74.

UŞD- Transparency International Turkey) (In Turkish: Uluslararası Şeffaflık Derneği) (2014). Ethics For Children: Value’s Education Guide (In Turkish: Etik Çocuk:Değerler Eğitimi İçin Bir Kılavuz Denemesi) Editör: Dr. Nermin Yavlal, İstanbul. http://www.seffaflik.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Etik-Cocuk-01_16-Eyl%C3%BCl 2014..-1.pdf Retrieved at 26/06/2015

Wymer W., Riecken G. ve Yavas U. (1996). Determinants of Volunteerism: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 4(4): 3-26.

http://www.turkcebilgi.com/gönüllü Retrieved at: 23-06-2015

Downloads

Published

2018-04-20

Issue

Section

Articles