SPATIAL ABILITY AND CHILDHOOD TOYS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL ENQUIRY FROM CHILDREN'S PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.2078Keywords:
spatial ability, lived experiences, childhood experiences, phenomenological enquiry, childhood toysAbstract
The present phenomenological study explores how school students see their childhood toys as facilitator or inhibitor of spatial ability in learning science in the school. Specifically, the aim was to elicit, describe, and analyze the background, perspectives and experiences of the students that contributed in developing their spatial ability. For this purpose, twenty-four students of Grade X who have compulsory science were selected. Upon identifying two groups of high spatial performers and low spatial performers, qualitative techniques were used to gather data. The tools and techniques included personal in-depth interviews, focus group discussion, observations, and think aloud task performances. Data was analyzed through the data explicitation processes suggested by Giorgi, providing textural and structural descriptions from every participant. Quality of engagement with childhood toys emerged as a major themes that marked out the differences between both the groups. This may help stakeholders such as educators, teachers, parents, students, and curriculum developers in understanding the lasting role of childhood toys on development of spatial abilities which influence the learning of school science.
Article visualizations:
References
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). Spatial ability in children's play with Lego blocks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 19-28.
Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1999). Evidence in support of a model that predicts how biological and environmental factors interact to influence spatial skills. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1237-1247.
Conner, J. M., Serbin, L. A., & Schackman, M. (1977). Sex differences in children’s response to training on a visual-spatial test. Developmental Psychology, 13(3), 293-294.
Fisher-Thompson, D. (1990). Adult sex typing of children’s toys. Sex Roles, 23(5/6), 291-303.
Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological methods as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235-260.
Giorgi, A. (Ed.). (1985). Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh, PA:
Hall, J., & Kimura, D. (1995, August). Sexual orientation and performance on sexually dimorphic motor tasks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24(4), 395.
Harris, L. J. (1978). Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical function of the brain (pp. 405-521). London: Cambridge University.
Hegarty, M. (2007). The Role of Spatial Thinking in Undergraduate Science Education. Thinking, 1–34.
Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Cohen, C., Montello, D. R., & Lippa, Y. (2007). The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. In Applied Spatial Cognition. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60611-2
Mann, V. A., Sasanuma, S., Sakuma, S., & Masaki, S. (1990). Sex differences in cognitive abilities: A cross-cultural perspective. Neuropsychologia, 28(10), 1063-1077.
McGee, M. G. (1979a). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889-918.
Mohler, J. L. (2008). Examining the spatial ability phenomenon from the student’s perspective. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 72(3), 1-15.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Sanders, B., Cohen, M. R., & Soares, M. P. (1986). The sex difference in spatial ability: A rejoinder. American Psychologist, 41, 1015-1016.
Sorby, S. A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63(2), 21-32.
Stumpf, H., & Klieme, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 915-921.
Tracy, D. M. (1990). Toy-playing behavior, sex-role orientation, spatial ability, and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(7), 637-649.
Vandenberg, S. G. (1971). The Mental Rotations Test. Boulder: University of Colorado. Duquesne University Press.
Vandenberg, S. G. (1975). Sources of variance in performance on spatial tests. In J. Eliot & N. J. Salkind (Eds.), Children’s spatial development (pp. 57- 66). Springfield, MA: Thomas.
Vandenberg, S. G., Kuse, A. R., Vogler, G. P. (1985). Searching for correlates of spatial ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 343-350.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00332909.117.2.250
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
