THE KINEMATIC DIFFERENCES IN THE GLIDE KIP ON HORIZONTAL BAR BETWEEN THE ELITE GYMNAST AND STUDENTS

Authors

  • Aleksandar Aceski Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
  • Katerina Spasovska Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.2197

Keywords:

biomechanics, artistic gymnastics, motion pattern, kinematic analysis

Abstract

The bar is one of the most attractive gymnastic disciplines that abound with elements of varying degrees of difficulty. The glide kip represents one part of the choreography of movements that the gymnast should master to the highest level in order to achieve as successful a transition as possible to other more complex elements. 2D kinematical analysis has the potential to objectively register the planar movements and that’s why the purpose of this research was to use this method to determine and compare the kinematic characteristics of the element in gymnasts and students. The research shows very similar results in the angular displacement in the hip joint and the difference in the angular velocity. Also, students show a different direction of swinging with their legs in the fourth phase. Regarding the time characteristics, the gymnasts and the students have different time duration but a very similar rhythm of movement. The largest difference is the angular displacement and the angular velocity in the knee joint. The obtained results can serve as a benchmark for the key elements of the movement which are important for a successful performance of the element and where instructions should be targeted during learning and improving the element in such a sample of respondents.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Author Biographies

  • Aleksandar Aceski, Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

    Aleksandar Aceski is currently Associate Professor at the Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health, Department of Biomechanics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. He has research interests in biomechanical methods of testing and analysis of human performance.

  • Katerina Spasovska, Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

    Katerina Spasovaka is currently Associate Professor at the Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health, Department of Gymnastics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. She has research interests in motor learning in gymnastics.

References

Bartlett, R. 2007. Introduction to sports biomechanics, analysing human movement patterns 2nd Edition. Routledge.

Bullock, S.G., Schmitt, C.A., Shutt, M.J., Cook, G., & Butler, J.R. 2017. Kinematic and kinetic variables differ between kettlebell swing styles. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jun; 12(3): 324–332.

Elmer, Ј.Е. & Martin, D.J. 2009. Fourier Series Approximations and Low Pass Filtering: Facilitating Learning of Digital Signal Processing for Biomechanics Students. Sportscience, 13, 1-8.

Heinen, T., Apitius, K., & Mirzaie, F. 2013. Movement regulation of the glide kip in gymnastics. Sport Science, 1: 82‐86.

Hough, J.E. 1970. A film analysis of the glide kip. Master’s thesis. University of Tennessee.

Kim, S.K., Kim., S.E., & Jang, S.D. 2013. A kinematic analysis of glide kip motion on the uneven bars. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, Vol. 23, No. 4, 307-318.

Knudson, V.D. 2013. Qualitative diagnosis of human movement 3th Edition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Miller, A., & Callister, R. 2009. Reliable lower limb musculoskeletal profiling using easily operated, portable equipment. Elsevier, Physical Therapy in Sport 10, 30–37.

Mitchell, D., Davis, B., & Lopez, R. 2002. Teaching fundamental gymnastics skills. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

McLean, S.G., Walker, K., Ford, K.R., Myer, G.D., Hewett, T.E., & Bogert, A.J. 2005. Evaluation of a two dimensional analysis method as a screening and evaluation tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Sports Med,39:355–362.

Mooney, M.C. 1977. A kinematographic analysis of a glide kip on the uneven parallel bars. Doctoral dissertation in physical education. Texas Tech University.

Munro, A., Herrington, L., & Carolan, M. 2012. Reliability of 2-dimensional video assessment of frontal-plane dynamic knee valgus during common athletic screening tasks. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation,21(1), 7–11.

Norris, B.S., Olson, L.S. 2011. Concurrent validity and reliability of two-dimensional video analysis of hip and knee joint motion during mechanical lifting. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 2011; 27(7):521–530.

Payton, C.J., & Bartlett, R. 2008. Biomechanical evaluation of movement in sport and exercise. The British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences Guidelines. Routledge.

Robertson, D.G., Caldwell, E.G., Hamill, J., Kamen, G., & Whittlesey, N.S. 2014. Research methods in biomechanics 2nd edition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Туфекчиевски, А., и Ацески, А. 2009. Биомеханика, второ прошиено и дополнето издание. Факултет за физичка култура – Скопје.

Wilson, D.J., Ireland L.M., Davis, I. 2006. Core Strength and Lower Extremity Alignment during Single Leg Squats. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 945–952

Winter, D.A. 2009. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, INC.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-12

Issue

Section

Articles