COLLISION OF DEMOCRATIC COACHING LEADERSHIP STYLE TO IMPROVE TECHNICAL SKILLS OF BADMINTON PLAYERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.2591Keywords:
democratic coaching style, impact assessment, players, badmintonAbstract
This research study was carried out on the game technique of badminton players during the tournament educational organizational structure for developing successful inter-collegiate and inter-department level badminton players of Sukkur region, Sindh. The study was conducted on 200 male players of Badminton. The student-players of 20 affiliated colleges (N=100) and 20 teaching departments (N=100) of Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur participated in the study through a survey questionnaire was applied for the collection of data. The results show that the majority of students were with the higher impact of democratic coaching on technical skills of the badminton players. The frequencies, percentages were differently found with the overall means such as; 2.51, 2.55, 2.41, 2.39 and 2.48, respectively which were significantly different to each other. It is concluded that this information will help the coaches to improve the techniques of badminton players. Therefore, it is suggested that the University or College level inter-collegiate and inter-department badminton tournaments should be arranged and encouraged.
Article visualizations:
References
Alam, F., H. Choudheri, Ch. Thepadungporn, A. Subic and M. M. K. Khan. (2009). International School of aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering and built environment, Central queen’s land University Rokhampton Australia. J. Mech. and Material Eng., 4, 266-272.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman & Company.
Badminton Australia (2012). Fitness testing. Retrieved from http://www.badminton.org.au/development/juniorprograms/ fitness-testing.
Christensen, B. T., and L. J. Ball. (2016). Dimension of creative evaluation: Distinct design and reasoning strategies for aesthetic, functional and originally judgments. Design Studies, 45(PA), 116-136.
Carey, W., D. J. Philippon and G. G. Cummings. (2011). Coaching models for leadership development: An integrative review, Journal of leadership studies, 5(1): 51-69.
Farrow, D. and B. Abernethy. (2003). Do expertise and the degree of perception-active coupling affect natural anticipatory performance, Perception, 32: 1127-1139.
Grice, T., (2008). Badminton: Steps to Success. Human Kinetics. United States of America 2nd ed.
Feltz, D. L., M. A. Chase, S. E. Moritz, and P. J. Sullivan. (1999). A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4): 765-776.
Horn, T. S., (2008). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In: T.S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (Pp. 239-267). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Kavussanu, M., I. D. Boardly, N. Jutkiewiez, S. Vincent, and C. Ring. (2008). The Coaching efficacy and Coaching effectiveness. The Sports Psycho., 22(4): 383-404.
Kwan M, C. L. Cheng and W. T. Tang. (2010). Measurement of badminton racket deflection during a stroke. Sports Eng., 12(3):143–53.
Kristiansen, E., S. E. Tomten, D. V. Hanstad, and G. C. Roberts. (2012). Coaching communication issues with elite female athletes: Two Norwegian case studies. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 22: 156-167.
Marback, T. L., M. W. Short, S. E. Short, and P. J. Sullivan. (2005). Coaching confidence: An exploratory investigation of sources and gender differences. Journal of Sport Behavior, 28: 18–34.
Myers, N. D., E. W. Wolfe and D. L. Feltz. (2006). An evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of exercise science, 9(3): 133-105.
Naidoo, P., C. Yoga & J. Surujlal (2015). “Perceived leadership styles of sport administrators and the relationship with organizational effectiveness”, African Journal for physical, health, education, recreation and dance. Pp. 167-181.
Pilus, A. H. M. and Saadan R. (2009). Coaching leadership styles and athlete satisfactions among Hockey team. J. Human Capital Develop., 2(1): 77-87.
Phomsoupha, M. and G. Laffaye (2015). The Science of Badminton: Game Characteristics, Anthropometry, Physiology, Visual Fitness and Biomechanics. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267574668.
Ryan, J. C., and S. A. Tipu. (2013). Leadership effects on innovation propensity: A two-factor full range leadership model, Journal of Business Research, 66: 2116-2129.
Rodolfo, A. Ignacio, R. C. Montecalbo-Ignacio and R. C. Cardenas. (2017). “The Relationship between Perceived Coach Leadership Behaviors and Athletes Satisfaction” International. Journal of Sports Science, 7 (5): 196-202
Smith, R. E. (2010). A positive approach to coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. In: J. M. Williams (Ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill. Applied sport psychology: personal growth to peak performance (Pp. 42-58).
Singh J., S. Raza and A. Mohammad (2011). Physical characteristics and level of performance in badminton: a relationship study. J Educ. Pract. 2(5): 6–10.
Surujlal, J. and M. Dhurup. (2012). African Journal for Physical Health Education, Recreation and Dance - Athlete preference of coach's leadership style: sport management. African J. for Physical Health Education, Recreation and Dance, 18 (1): 111 – 121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


