U19 (AGE 16-19) INVESTIGATION OF VIOLENCE TENDENCIES OF SOCCER PLAYERS

Authors

  • Mustafa Demir İstanbul Gelişim University, Department of Exercise and Sports Sciences, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.2602

Keywords:

violence, violence in football, violence in sports, domestic violence

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the violence tendency levels of U-19 team athletes in football clubs according to familial factors. Methods: In our study, 150 athletes who played football in U19 teams as licensed in amateur sports clubs participated (n = 150). The universe of the study is the football clubs in Gaziosmanpaşa district. Our sample group consists in U19 (16-19 years) team players who officially joined the football teams of Gaziosmanpaşa district. The personal information form developed by the researcher was used to learn the socio-demographic information of the voluntarily participating players and the Violence Tendency Scale was used to measure the violence tendencies. Results: According to the demographic characteristics of the participants, 8.7% of the mothers were not literate, 16.0% were literate, 49.3% were primary, 19.3% were high school and 6.7% were university graduates. Looking at the situation of exposure to domestic violence, 12% answered yes and 88% answered no. Conclusions: When the participants' exposure to domestic violence and their tendency to violence are examined, it is seen that there is no significant difference between those who are exposed to domestic violence and those who are not.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Bahçivan-Saydam R., & Gençöz T., 2005. Family relationships, parenting attitude and self-esteem relationship with behavioral problems indicated by young people. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 20(55), 61.

Budak S., 2003. Psychology Dictionary, Science and Art Publications, Ankara.

World Health Organization, 2002. World report on violence and health, Geneva: WHO, 2002. WHO Technical Report Series, 866.

Ellickson P., Saner H., & McGuigan K. A., 1997. Profiles of violent youth: substance use and other concurrent problems. American journal of public health, 87(6), 985-991.

Alikasifoglu M., Erginoz E., Ercan O., Uysal O., Kaymak D. A., & Ilter O., 2004. Violent behaviour among Turkish high school students and correlates of physical fighting, The European Journal of Public Health, 14(2), 173-177.

Avcı R., 2006. Examination of the families of adolescents with and without violent behavior in terms of family functions anger and anger expression styles, Unpublished master's thesis, Çukurova University.

Kabakuş A. K., Özen Ü., & Eygü H., 2013. University students' perception of violence and aggression in sports, Gümüshane University Electronic Journal of the Institute of Social Science, 4(7).

Razali N. M., & Wah Y. B., 2011. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests, Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21-33.

Kurumu T. C. B. A. A., 1998. Violence in the family and violence in the social sphere, Ankara: Prime Ministry Printing House.

Yalçın İ., 2004. Aggression levels of high school students who have different social support levels perceptions from their families. Unpublished master's thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.

Dunn J., Deater-Deckard K., Pickering K., O’Connor T. G., & Golding J., 1998. Children’s adjustment and prosocial behaviour in step, single-parent, and non-stepfamily setting: Findings from a community study, J. Child Psychol, Psychiat, 39(8), 1083-1095.

Feyzioğlu S., Kuşçuoğlu, C., 2011. Single Parent Family, Journal of Social Policy Studies 26 / 26 (September 2011): 97-110.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles