BLENDED LEARNING IN BADMINTON TRAINING FOR PROFESSIONALS: STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PERFORMANCE IMPACTS

Authors

  • Chau Vinh Huy HCMC University of Physical Education & Sports, 639 Nguyen Trai District 5, Ho Chi Minh city, 749000, Vietnam
  • Nguyen The Luong HCMC University of Physical Education & Sports, 639 Nguyen Trai District 5, Ho Chi Minh city, 749000, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Ngoc Vu Hoa Sen University, 8 Nguyen Van Trang District 1, Ho Chi Minh city, 71000, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v6i6.3226

Keywords:

blended learning, e-sports, online badminton, physical education

Abstract

As with other subject areas, badminton instruction for practitioners is experiencing a lot of changes under the impact of technology. Recently there has been the possibility of moving badminton training classes to the online platform but there is no consensus on its efficacy. This study is conducted to study the effects of blended learning activities on the perceptions and performance of students in physical education. Forty students in physical education are selected and divided into two groups: an experimental group, and a control group. All groups in face-to-face learning sessions have the same curriculum, course-book, equipment and teaching method. The questionnaire and interview data show that students in blended class sessions had positive perceptions of learning activities.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

References

Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A Study of Student's Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183-193.

Bleed, R. (2001). A Hybrid Campus for a New Millennium. Educause Review, 36(1), 5.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp. 3–21. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

Harding, A., Kaczynski D., & Wood L. (2005). Evaluation of blended learning: Analysis of qualitative data. In Proceedings of UniServe Science Blended Learning Symposium. 56–61.

Jochems, W., Merrienboer, J. V., & Koper, R. (2004). Integrated E-Learning: Implications for Pedagogy, Technology and Organization: Routledge.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Language learning defined by time aConfnd place: A framework for next generation designs. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Nguyen Ngoc Vu (2016a). Mobile learning in language teaching context of Vietnam: An evaluation of students’ readiness. Journal of Science, HCMC University of Education. No 7(85)/2016,16-27.

Nguyen Ngoc Vu (2016b). An investigation of Vietnamese students’ learning styles in online language learning. Journal of Science, HCMC University of Education. No 1(79)/2016,25-34.

Rudestam, K. E., & Schoenholtz-Read, J. (2009). Handbook of online learning. Sage Publications.

Sharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 64(4), 456-458.

Taylor, J. A. and Newton, D. (2013). Beyond blended learning: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. Internet and Higher Education, 18: 54-60.

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to integrate online & traditional learning. VA: London and Sterling.

Troha, F. (2002). Bulletproof instructional Design: A model for blended learning. USDLA Journal, 16(5).

Young, J. R. (2002). "Hybrid" Teaching Seeks to End the Divide between Traditional and Online Instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, 33-34.

Watson, J. (2008). Different types of blended learning. Retrieved on 1 Jan 2010 from: https://sites.google.com/a/idahopd.org/blended-learning/different-types.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-29

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 6 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).