COMPARISON OF AVERAGE AND PEAK ANAEROBIC POWER LEVELS BY LOCATIONS IN HANDBALL

Authors

  • Cengiz Taşkın Kilis 7 Aralık University, School of Physical Education and Sports, Turkey
  • Ali Kemal Taşkın Kilis 7 Aralık University, School of Physical Education and Sports, Turkey
  • Rukiye Yasemin Üzüm Kilis 7 Aralık University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Coaching Education, Turkey
  • Ayşe Ece Ak Selcuk University Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v6i8.3365

Keywords:

handball, anaerobic energy, anaerobic power

Abstract

The aim of this study is: it is thought that researching and knowing the physical characteristics of handball players and their quickness and agility performances according to their playing positions can also be helpful in choosing athletes according to their positions in handball. Research in Turkey handball federation 2. league active handball playing 5 keeper, 10 central playmaker, 5 right quarterback, 5 left playmaker, 5 right, 5 left, and was attended by 5 volunteered a total of 40 male handball players, including pivot. Agility test measurement illionis test was performed. In the speedy test measurement, the test distance is determined as 5 meters. The track consists of 4 slaloms, two at the beginning and two at the end. One photocell is placed at the exit and at the end. When we examine the quickness and agility performances of the athletes in our study; It has been observed that the players playing in the right and left wing players and the right-left playmaker have the best values in their quickness and agility performances, and the players playing in the pivot area have the worst values.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

References

Ateşoğlu U, Tamer K, 1999. Türkiye Bayan Hentbol Liginde Oynayan Hentbolcuların Fiziksel ve Fizyolojik Profilleri. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, IV, 1, 1-8.

Can İ, 2009. 16-18 Yaş Grubu Basketbol, Futbol ve Hentbolcuların Aerobik Güç Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Deneysel Araştırma. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.

Cardinale M, 2001. Handball Performance: Physiological Considerations and Practical Approach for Training Metabolic Aspects. Materials From 3rd & 4th Congress Sport Medicine & Handball from: http://www.sportscoach-sci.com

Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibanez J, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Veizquierdo M 2006. Effects of an Entire Season on Physical Fitness Changes in Elite Male Handball Players. Medicine veScience in Sports ve Exercise, 38(2), 357-366.

Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibáñez J, Izquierdo M, 2005. Differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity among elite and amateur male handball players. Int J Sports Med.; 26(3), 225-32.

Granados C, Izquierdo M, Ibáñez J, Ruesta M, Gorostiaga EM, 2008. Effects of an entire season on physical fitness in elite women’s handball players. Med Sci Sports Exercise, 40(2), 351-61.

Hasdemir S, Gündüz N, Müniroğlu S, 2003. Bayan Hentbolcuların Görsel ve İşitsel Reaksiyon Zaman Farklarının İncelenmesi, Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 1(1), 49-52.

Heller J, Novotny J, 1997. Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Elite Mountain Bikers, Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica. 33, (1), 61-68.

Johnson DL, Bahamonde R, 1996. Power output estimate in university athletes. J Strength Cond Res.,10(3), 161-6.

Kurudirek M, 1998. Antropometri, Sporda Yetenek Seçimi ve Morfolojik Planlama Erzurum.

Massuça L, Branco B, Miarka B, Fragoso I, 2015. Physical fitness attributes of team-handball players are related to playing position and performance level. Asian J Sports Medicine.

Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N, 2006. Profiling in Basketball: Physical and Physiological Characteristics of Elite Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 20 (4), 740-744.

Özkan A, Koz M, Ersöz G, 2011. Wingate Anaerobik Güç Testinde Optimal Yükün Belirlenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 9(1), 1-5.

Rannou F, Prioux J, Zouhal H, Gratas-Delamarche A, Delamarche P, 2001. Physiological Profile of Handball Players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 41(3), 349-53.

Srhoj J., Marinovi M, Rogulj N, 2002. Characteristics of Male Handball Players, Coll. Antropol, 26, 1: 219-227. 1,Tunisian Research Laboratory «Sport Performance Optimization», Tunis, Tunisia.

Şentürk İ, 2016. Elit Hentbolcularda Sürat, Çeviklik ve Kuvvet Parametrelerinin Pozisyonlara Göre İncelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.

Taşkın C, Karakoç Ö, Taşkın M, Dural M, 2016 . Analysis of Reaction Times and Aerobic Capacities of Soccer Players According to Their Playing Positions. Journal of Education and Training Studies Vol. 4, No. 8; ISSN 2324-805X E-ISSN 2324-8068.

Taşucu E, 2002. Türk Erkek Hentbol Milli Takımının Somatotip Profilinin Belirlenmesi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.

Vardar SA, Tezel S, Öztürk L, Kaya O, 2007. The Relationship Between Body Composition and Anaerobic Performance of Elite Young Wrestlers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 6 (CSSI-2), 34-38.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles