PACK RUNNING AMONG FEMALE NCAA COLLEGIATE CROSS COUNTRY TEAMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v9i1.4484Keywords:
packing, distance running performance, coaching strategies, running strategies, group running, team performanceAbstract
The purpose of this study was to identify if there was a relationship between running with a teammate(s), often referred to as packing, during a cross-country race and lower aggregate team times of the top five scoring runners. This study examined packing strategies of Division 1 NCAA female cross-country runners. Packing was defined as any team member running within a second of a teammate at a given checkpoint during the race. All competitors across three women’s races wore chip-timing bibs that recorded each competitor’s time at checkpoints throughout the race. Only teams having five or more runners were included in the analysis. A “packing score %” was calculated for each team by dividing the number of times a runner was within a second of a teammate at a checkpoint in a given interval by the total number of packing opportunities within the interval (PS%). The total scoring team time was then calculated from the finishing time of each team’s top five runners (Team Aggregate Time-TAT). The correlation coefficient between PS% and TAT was r = -0.47 (p < 0.001). While more research is needed to identify how and when packing should be optimally used, empirical findings indicate packing is beneficially associated with team running times.
Article visualizations:
References
Baron, B., Moullan, F., Deruelle, F., & Noakes, T. D. (2009). The role of emotions on pacing strategies and performance in middle and long duration sport events. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 19, 220–238.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratlavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 74, 1252–1265.
Cormier, M. L., Bloom, G. A., & Harvey, W. J. (2015). Elite coach perceptions of cohesion on coacting teams. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 10(6), 1039–1053.
Corvalán-Grössling, V. (1995). The physiological and perceived effects of drafting on a group of highly trained distance runners (T). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, 1919-2007.Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0077144
Davies C. T. (1980). Effects of wind assistance and resistance on the forward motion of a runner. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology, 48(4), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1980.48.4.702
Deaner, R. O., Carter, R. E., Joyner, M. J., & Hunter, S. K. (2015). Men are more likely than women to slow in the marathon. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(3), 607–616.
Deaner, R. O., Lowen, A. (2016). Males and females pace differently in high school cross-country races. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(11), 2991–2997.
Evans, B., Eys, M., & Wolf, S. (2013). Exploring the nature of interpersonal influence in elite individual sport teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(4), 448-462.
Hanley, B. (2015) Pacing profiles and pack running at the IAAF World Half Marathon Championships. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33 (11), 1189–1195.
Hanley, B. (2016). Pacing, packing and sex-based differences in Olympic and IAAF World Championship marathons. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(17), 1675-1681.
Høigaard, R., Boen, F., De Cuyper, B., & Peters, D. M. (2013). Team identification reduces social loafing and promotes social laboring in cycling. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 25(1), 33-40.
Høigaard, R., Tofteland, I.; Ommundsen, Y. (2006). The effect of team cohesion on social loafing in relay teams. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 18(1), 59-73.
Hunter, S. K. (2014). Sex differences in human fatigability: Mechanisms and insight to physiological responses. Acta Physiologica, 210(4), 768–789.
Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1995), Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in athletic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 5: 191-199. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00035.x
Pugh L. G. (1971). The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces. The Journal of physiology, 213(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009381
Raafat, R., Chater, N., & Frith, C., (2009). Herding in humans, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 420-428.
Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139-142. doi:10.1057/jt.2009.5
Stevenson, Roy (2016). Cross country running: Learning to race like a team. https://www.roy-stevenson.com/cross-country-running.html
Tarnopolsky, M. A. (2008). Sex differences in exercise metabolism and the role of 17-Beta estradiol. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(4), 648–654.
Zouhal, H., Abderrahman, A. B., Prioux, J., Knechtle, B., Bouguerra, L., Kebsi, W. D., & Noakes, T. (2015). Drafting’s improvement of 3000-m running performance in elite athletes: Is it a placebo effect? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 10, 147-152. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0498.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


