INTRINSIC VS. EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION AMONG RECREATIONAL CROSSFIT ATHLETES: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION

Authors

  • Heather Callison Southern Utah University, Cedar City, Utah, United States
  • Mark DeBeliso Southern Utah University, Cedar City, Utah, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v10i5.5140

Keywords:

sport motivation, CrossFit, sport, athlete, recreational, self-determination

Abstract

Research has shown that many types of recreational athletes are intrinsically rather than extrinsically motivated to participate in their sport. Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine if recreational CrossFit participants are inclined to be more intrinsically or extrinsically motivated to participate in their sport. Methods: Participants were recruited from a local CrossFit gym in Southern Utah where they were provided a QR code linked to the Sports Motivation Scale II (SMS II survey). The SMS II survey assess 6 subscales of motivation regulation (intrinsic, integrated, identified, introjected, external, and non). Each of the 18 SMS II survey questions is scored on a Likert scale of 1-7 on a continuum of “Does not correspond at all” to “Corresponds completely”. For the purpose of the study, CrossFit participants were considered to as athletes. Results: The SMS II subscale scores were as follows (mean±SD): intrinsic (5.7±1.3), integrated (5.5±1.1), identified (6.2±1.0), introjected (4.6±1.3), external (2.4±1.4), and non (1.7±1.1). The Identified regulation subscale scores were greater than all other subscales scores (p<0.05). The Intrinsic and Integrated regulation subscale scores were similar and greater than Introjected, External and Non regulation subscale scores (p<0.05). The Introjected regulation subscale scores were greater than the External and Non regulation subscale scores (p<0.05). The External regulation subscale scores were greater than the Non regulation subscores (p<0.05). Conclusions: Within the parameters of this study, it appears that recreational CrossFit participants find motivation within themselves to participate in CrossFit training style exercise sessions.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biographies

  • Heather Callison, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, Utah, United States

    Heather Callison, MSc earned her Masters of Science degree at Southern Utah University. She is currently the Director of Student Outreach & Support at Southern Utah University. Her research interests include: CrossFit, sports psychology, neuro kinesiology, and biomechanics. Heather has a passion to continuously understand the mind-body connection in mental and physical growth.

  • Mark DeBeliso, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, Utah, United States

    Mark DeBeliso, PhD FACSM is a Professor Emeritus at Southern Utah University. His research interests include: orthopaedic biomechanics, mechanics and metabolics of sport movements and work tasks, strength training for all walks of life, and masters athletes.

References

Ayar, H. (2018). Effects of motivations in participating to CrossFit centers with the purpose of recreative exercise. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 4(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/doi:10.5281/zenodo.1147142

Cazayoux, M., DeBeliso, M. (2019). Effect of grit on performance in CrossFit in advanced and novice athletes. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, 5(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.517615

Chicote-López, J., Abarca-Sos, A., Gallardo, L. O., & García-González, L. (2017). Social antecedents in physical activity: Tracking the self-determination theory sequence in adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(3), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21945

Chin, N.-S., Khoo, S., & Low, W.-Y. (2012). Self-determination and goal orientation in track and field. Journal of Human Kinetics, 33(2012), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0054-0

Claudino, J.G., Gabbett, T.J., Bourgeois, F., Sá Souza, H. de, Miranda, R.C., Mezêncio, B., Soncin, R., Cardoso Filho, C.A., Bottaro, M., Hernandez, A.J., Amadio., A.C., & Serrão J.C. (2018). CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine – Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5

CrossFit, LLC, (2022) What is CrossFit? CrossFit. https://www.crossfit.com/what-is-crossfit

CrossFitHQ. (2015, December 28). The Power Clean. YouTube. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVt4uQ0sDJE

Davies, M.J., Coleman, L., & Stellino, M.B. (2013). The relationship between basic psychological need satisfaction, behavioral regulation, and participation in CrossFit. Journal of Sports Behavior, 39(3), 239-254.

Dominski, F. H., Serafim, T. T., Siqueira, T. C., & Andrade, A. (2020). Psychological variables of CrossFit Participants: A systematic review. Sport Sciences for Health, 17(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-020-00685-9

Domuschieva-Rogleva, G. (2015). Determinant of sport motivation with wrestling athletes. National Sports Academy, 43, 94–98.

Domuschieva-Rogleva1, G., & Yancheva, M. (2021). Sambo competitors' sports motivation and satisfaction. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 19(1), 754–758. https://doi.org/doi:10.15547/tjs.2021.s.01.117

Ersös, G., Özşaker, M., & Sasur, S. (2013). A Self-Determination Theory approach to motivational orientations, basic needs satisfaction, and psychological well-being in exercise. Niğde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 10(2), 306–317.

Fisher, J., Sales, A., Carlson, L., & Steele, J. (2017). A comparison of the motivational factors between CrossFit participants and other resistance exercise modalities: A pilot study. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 57(9). https://doi.org/10.23736/s0022-4707.16.06434-3

Gerhart H.D. A comparison of Crossfit training to traditional anaerobic resistance training in terms of selected fitness domains representative of overall athletic performance. Master Theses, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2013. http://knowledge.library.iup.edu/etd/1175

Haynes E., DeBeliso, M. (2019). The relationship between CrossFit performance and grip strength. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, 5(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.515874

Kretchmar, J. (2021). Motivation. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Pelletier, L. G., Rocchi, M. A., Vallerand, R. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.002

Li, C., Kawabata, M., & Zhang, L. (2016). Validity and reliability of the sport motivation scale-II for Chinese athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2016.1153130

McLachlan, S., & Hagger, M. S. (2011). Do people differentiate between intrinsic and extrinsic goals for physical activity? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(2), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.2.273

Park, S.-H., Lim, B.-S., & Lim, S.-T. (2020). The effects of self-talk on shooting athletes’ motivation. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 19, 517–521.

Repovich, W.E.S. (2021). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health.

Rodrigues, F., Pelletier, L., Rocchi, M., Cid, L., Teixeira, D., & Monteiro, D. (2021). Adaptation and validation of a Portuguese version of the Sports Motivation Scale-II (SMS-II-P) showing invariance for gender and sport type. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(6), 2669–2687. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211039362

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L., (2002) An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E.L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Sebire, S. J., Standage, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2009). Examining intrinsic versus extrinsic exercise goals: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.2.189

Smohai, M., Szemes, Á., Bernhardt-Torma, N., Mirnics, Z., Bóna, K., Kovàcs, K., Gyömber, N., Béres, R., Köv, Z.S., Mészàros, V., Tanyi, Z., Kovàcs, D., Vass, Z., & Tóth L. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Hungarian adaptation of the Sport Motivation Scale II. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(3), 2209–2218. https://doi.org/DOI:10.7752/jpes.2021.s3281

Teo, E.-W., Khoo, S., Wong, R., Wee, E.-H., Lim, B.-H., & Rengasamy, S. S. (2015). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among adolescent ten-pin bowlers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Journal of Human Kinetics, 45(1), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0025

Walczak, M., & Tomczak, M. (2019). Validation of the Polish version of Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Effect of gender, level of participation and sport type on intrinsic and extrinsic motives. TRENDS in Sport Sciences, 26(4), 187–195. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.23829/TSS.2019.26.4-7

Williams, J. M., Krane, V., DeFreese, J. D., Raedeke, T. D., & Smith, A. L. (2021). Athlete Burnout: An Individual and Organizational Phenomenon. In Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance (8th ed., pp. 475–491). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Williams, J. M., Krane, V., Duda, J. L., & Treasure, D. C. (2021). The Motivational Climate, Motivation, and Implications for Empowering Athletes and the Promotion of the Quality of Sport Engagement. In Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth To Peak Performance (8th ed., pp. 57–76). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21

Issue

Section

Articles