MINDFUL MOVEMENT IN THE DIGITAL AGE: UNDERSTANDING FITNESS MODALITIES AND MENTAL WELL-BEING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v13i6.6969Keywords:
fitness modality, mental well-being, digital fitness, traditional functional movement, college students, WEMWBSAbstract
This study examined the relationship between fitness modality preference and mental well-being among college students enrolled in PATHFIT 2 at Mapúa University. With the increasing integration of digital fitness applications such as Strava alongside structured functional movement activities, understanding their comparative psychological impact has become increasingly relevant. Grounded in Mindfulness Theory and Self-Determination Theory, the study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. A total of 138 students participated in the study. Mental well-being was measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, and two open-ended questions explored students’ perceptions of how physical activity influenced their stress and mood. Descriptive statistics, an independent-samples t-test, and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Results revealed that 77.5% of students preferred traditional functional movement, while 22.5% preferred digital app–guided exercise. Although students who preferred traditional movement showed slightly higher mean mental well-being scores (M = 50.58) than those who preferred digital modalities (M = 49.29), the difference was not statistically significant (t = 0.71, p = 0.48). Qualitative findings indicated that psychological benefits were primarily attributed to physical challenge, stress relief, social interaction, and activity pacing rather than modality type. The study concludes that while structured instructor-led functional movement was more preferred among students, both structured instructor-led functional movement programs and digital fitness modalities were associated with positive mental well-being. Engagement quality, rather than delivery format, appears to be the key factor influencing psychological outcomes. Recommendations included integrating both modalities within physical education programs and emphasizing meaningful engagement during activities.References
Al-Johani, A. (2021). Physical activity and mental well-being among adult educators: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Mental Health & Physical Activity, 16, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2021.100348
Baretta, D., Perski, O., & Steca, P. (2019). The role of mobile health applications in promoting exercise adherence: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01234
Behm, D. G., & Chaouachi, A. (2011). A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(11), 2633–2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1879-2
Biddle, S. J. H., Ciaccioni, S., Thomas, G., & Vergeer, I. (2019). Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.011
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.2016050111
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Fox, K. R. (1999). The influence of physical activity on mental well-being. Public Health Nutrition, 2(3a), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980099000567
Lee, J., Cho, H., Kim, Y., & Park, H. (2024). The effectiveness of digital fitness applications in promoting physical activity and mental well-being: A cross-cultural analysis. Scientific Reports, 14, 61268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61268-z
Mahindru, S., Sharma, P., & Singh, R. (2023). Physical activity and mental well-being in university students. Journal of Mental Health & Physical Activity, 18, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2023.100454
Montón‑Martínez, A., Fernández-Lázaro, D., & Mielgo-Ayuso, J. (2024). Effects of structured exercise interventions on mental health outcomes: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 123456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.123456
Montón‑Martínez, A., Fernández-Lázaro, D., & Mielgo-Ayuso, J. (2024). Effects of structured exercise interventions on mental health outcomes: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 123456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.123456
Rebar, A. L., Stanton, R., Geard, D., Short, C., Duncan, M. J., & Vandelanotte, C. (2015). A meta-meta-analysis of the effect of physical activity on depression and anxiety in non-clinical adult populations. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1022901
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


