MARGINALIZATION OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION: EXPERIENCES AND VIEWS OF PRE-SERVICE AND IN-SERVICE PE TEACHERS

Autors/ores

  • Hazel Mae P. Laquinarion Student, University of Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Marian Joy B. Lusbog Student, University of Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Joeielyn P. Sarona Student, University of Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Lenziel L. Galaura Professor, EdD, University of Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v11i4.5539

Paraules clau:

marginalization, pre-service, in-service, PE teachers

Resum

The quality of instruction of pre-service and in-service Physical Education instructors has been cited as being negatively impacted by the Physical Education program's marginalization around the world. Consequently, the PE subject received insignificant perceptions and inadequate support. This phenomenological research explored the experiences of pre-service and in-service and how they overcome challenges to deliver high-quality Physical Education. Further, the study seeks to comprehend how people see problems and potential solutions. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, the responses that were compiled were analyzed, and themes were developed. Respondents were identified through purposive sampling. The analysis's findings point to three intriguing themes: barriers to effective PE classes, negative public views as a subject, and coping mechanisms against the marginalization of PE teachers. The participants' perceptions and experiences allow them to develop strategies and ideas and promptly commit to and chair misguided judgments about the PE program. This literature review study found that Physical Education programs are being marginalized, but there are ways for PE teachers to address the problem.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Referències

Beni et al. (2021). ‘It’s how PE should be!’: Classroom teachers’ experiences of implementing meaningful Physical Education. Volume 27, Issue 3 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1356336X20984188

Cardinal, B. (2019). How can we improve the marginalization of the field of physical education? How can we be seen and treated as a field as important as science, math and English? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89:7, 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1492249

Charrette, P. (2023). Teaching PE: Breaking Through the Obstacles, Overcoming the Challenges. Retrieved from https://www.capnpetespowerpe.com/single-post/2018/02/21/teaching-pe-breaking-through-the-obstacles-overcoming-the-challenges

Cruickshank, V., Hyndman, B., Patterson, K., & Kebble, P. (2021). Encounters in a marginalized subject: The experiential challenges faced by Tasmanian health and Physical Education teachers. Australian Journal of Education, 65(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120934964

Curtin, D. (2023). Motivating Students In Physical Education. PLT4M. https://plt4m.com/blog/motivating-students-in-physical-education/

Dewi, Citra. (2021) Management of Physical Education Facilities and Infrastructure. Volume 5, Number 2, pp. 291-297. https://www.academia.edu/95352891/Management_of_Physical_Education_Facilities_and_Infrastructure?fbclid=IwAR3L3yv7Fv38WDrN5YauGN6pXG0E1kmhpJso1nAyG9z2Uaj2WgZ6wYmhPLs

Diery, A. (2021) The Difficulties Which Face Physical Education in a Playing the Activity Curricula from Their Point of View in the Directorate in Irbid District. (n.d.). https://escientificpublishers.com/the-difficulties-which-face-physical-education-in-a-playing-the-activity-curricula-from-their-point-of-view-in-the-directorate-in-irbid-district-ANPH-03-0027

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1).

https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Fan, Y., Keating, X.D., Liu, J., Zhou K., Shangguan R., Knipe R., (2018, July 06) Development of a Scale Measuring Chinese Preservice Physical Education Teachers’ Beliefs About the Physical Education Profession. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 27, 365–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0395-0

Fernando, S. L. (2021). Fernando: Marginalization of some academic subjects. SUNSTAR. https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/1881802/baguio/opinion/fernandomarginalizationofsomeacademicsubjects?fbclid=IwAR0621pjWv736ALyqSR4SQty6uyld6t2C9oMJ9wUSKmw_Ig3OxH_l53Q

Garcia, J. P. (2021, February 23). Teaching Strategies of Physical Education Instructors of Kalinga State University. https://ijels.com/detail/teaching-strategies-of-physical-education-instructors-of-kalinga-state-university/

Gaudreault, K. L. (2018). Understanding the Perceived Mattering of Physical Education Teachers. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1180269

Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.009

Griggs, G., & Fleet, M. (2021, November 1). Most People Hate Physical Education and Most Drop Out of Physical Activity: In Search of Credible Curriculum Alternatives. Education Sciences, 11(11), 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110701

Henson K. T. (2015). Curriculum Planning. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=20gaBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&ots=HECJ6ssM-q&sig=MWDEbURiFFUnVx4jN8bVF_BWSA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Hogan, A., & Stylianou, M. (2018). School-based sports development and the role of NSOs as ‘boundary spanners’: benefits, disbenefits and unintended consequences of the sporting schools' policy initiative. Sport Education and Society, 23(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1184638

Hovdal, D. O. G., Larsen, I. B., Haugen, T., & Johansen, B. T. (2021). Understanding disruptive situations in physical education: Teaching style and didactic implications. European Physical Education Review, 27(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x20960498

Jenkinson et al. (2019). Barriers to Providing Physical Education and Physical Activity in Victorian State Secondary Schools. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ910415.pdf

Keane, T., & Keane, W. F. (2017). Achievements and challenges: Implementing a 1:1 program in a secondary school. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9470-

Kruikow, J. (2017). How to choose the right sample size for a qualitative study… and convince your supervisor that you know what you’re doing. Qualitative Researcher.

https://drkriukow.com/howtochoosetherightsamplesizeforaqualitativestudyandconvinceyoursupervisorthatyouknowwhatyouredoing/?fbclid=IwAR1FbOjVhmZ9No63FKUAMDVA6BYU43KYnRTcAjBar_dVNpkicXgcvU80

Mashud. (2020) The Effectiveness of Physical Education Learning in Elementary School Located in a Wetland Environment. Volume 5, Issue 2

http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/9555/1/JURNAL_SINTA_2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR24olzVfYf74_fKmHEZhBdE0BPPEz5ev7HrXkVXj3GiLrrjGytYPtEJm-w

Mendoza, P. (2019). Why is Physical Education a student’s most important subject? Retrieved from https://tedx.ucla.edu/project/william_simon_jr_why_is_physical_education/

Nasário, J. C., Zaia, V., Trevisan, C. M., Garzon, S., Laganà, A. S., & Montagna, E. (2020). Attitudes and Values of Physical Education Professionals and Undergraduate Students about Their Role in Health Promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072288

Nikolopoulou, K. (2021). What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/?fbclid=IwAR0I6J2OK9yoh6GNeIbNA4bR1bTdmNHHZYRn0MIvvKCVv71lg67wlQZdOQA

Nollaig McEvilly (2022). What is PE and who should teach it? Undergraduate PE students’ views and experiences of the outsourcing of PE in the UK, Sport, Education, and Society, 27:6, 662-675. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13573322.2021.1901684

Nowell, L., Norris, J., White, D., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. SAGE Journal, Volume 16–1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Paynter, M. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities for Incorporating Futures Education into a Crowded School Curriculum. Incorporating Futures Education. https://doi.org/10.26182/5b8354571ecdc

Pothamsetty, N. (2020). What’s Wrong with Physical Education? The Public Health Advocate. https://pha.berkeley.edu/2019/12/01/whatswrongwithphysicaleducation/?fbclid=IwAR0cs5Gt350ubGCQpz75FGUDzEYo_CFPvk4xXcFZOiKTMyMYhXnEVNBTM

Richards, K. A. R., Gaudreault, K. L., Starck, J. R., & Mays Woods, A. (2018, March 29). Physical Education teachers’ perceptions of perceived mattering and marginalization. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1455820

Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Buchanan, J., Varadharajan, M., & Burke, P. J. (2018). The experiences of early career teachers: new initiatives and old problems. Professional Development in Education, 44(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1274268

Sprake, Andrew & Palmer, Clivie (2018). Physical Education is just as important as any other school subject. https://phys.org/news/2018-10-physical-important-school-subject.html

Strati, A. D., Schmidt, J. A., & Maier, K. S. (2017). Perceived challenge, teacher support, and teacher obstruction as predictors of student engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000108

Verano, M. (2019). Problems Encountered by the P.E. Faculty Teachers and Their Needs in Teaching Performance. SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 6(1), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V6I1P117

Westwood P. (2018). Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom. Routledge. Rederived from https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9oNXDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT14&ots=ykDG7vdPGg&sig=ATcCLbyEi6nWX29ynjf4rJS5b4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Descàrregues

Publicat

2024-08-20

Número

Vol. 11 Núm. 4 (2024)

Secció

Articles

Llicència

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).