EVALUATION OF COACH LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR - CASE STUDY OF KENYAN SWIMMING COACHES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v11i4.5551Paraules clau:
swimming coaches, leadership styles, coaching behaviorResum
The leadership behavior exercised by a coach is key to athletes’ effectiveness. The study sought to evaluate the leadership behaviours employed by swimming coaches in Kenya and examine whether their leadership behaviours were similar to what other studies have found to be effective coaching leadership styles across various contexts and situations. The Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS) questionnaire was used to collect data on leadership behavior among the respondents. The study population comprised 28 swimming coaches (n = 24 males; n = 4 females) based in Kenya SPSS was used to analyse the data collected, where Mann-Whitney U test did not establish any significant difference across gender on the five types of leadership styles at p< .05. From the results, the most common leadership behavior among the swimming coaches was the use of Positive Feedback (x̄ = 4.5786), followed by Training and Instruction (x̄= 4.4588) then Social Support (x̄ = 3.5804) followed by Democratic (x̄ = 3.3690), while Autocratic (x̄ = 2.2571) was the least type of leadership style used. There was no significant difference across gender on any of the preferred leadership styles, with the ranking of the leadership styles being similar for both male and female coaches, as positive feedback was ranked highest and autocratic style ranked lowest. Kruskal Walli's test conducted across age groups of the coaches and the five leadership styles found no significant difference (at p = .435 for Democratic leadership style; p = .763 for Autocratic leadership style; p = .172 for Social Support leadership style; p = .698 for Training & Instruction leadership style). Studies done on coaching leadership styles preferred by athletes and have improved athletes’ performance have shown Training & Instruction and Positive Feedback as the most preferred type of leadership style. The autocratic leadership style has been viewed to have negative influence and the athletes do not like this style of leadership from their coaches. In comparison to the Kenyan swimming coaches, they employed the most preferred styles of leadership with emphasis being on Positive Feedback, this was attributed to the fact that most swimming coaches trained children below 12 years who value positive reinforcement even as they are instructed on corrective strategies. An effective coach is capable of motivating athletes to do well and achieve their maximum potential, thus the preferred leadership styles by athletes of Training & Instruction and Positive Feedback that have been shown to assist athletes to improve on their performance should be adopted by coaches.
Article visualizations:
Referències
Alemu, S. M., & Babu, M. S. (2012). The relationship between coaches' leadership styles, team cohesion and team success: the case of premier league soccer clubs in Ethiopia. International Journal of Social Science and Interdisciplinary Research, 1, 1-13.
Babbitt, D. G. (2019). Influences of Eastern and Western Cultures in Sport Coaching Leadership Styles: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Coaching Science, 13(1).
Camiré, M., Forneris, T., Trudel, P., & Bernard, D. (2011). Strategies for helping coaches facilitate positive youth development through sport. Journal of sport psychology in action, 2(2), 92-99.
Keatlholetswe, L., & Malete, L. (2019). Coaching efficacy, player perceptions of coaches’ leadership styles, and team performance in premier league soccer. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 90(1), 71-79.
Kevin Kruse (2013). What Is Leadership? Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2013/04/09/what-is-leadership/
Kim, H. D., & Cruz, A. B. (2016). The influence of coaches’ leadership styles on athletes’ satisfaction and team cohesion: A meta-analytic approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(6), 900-909.
Nazarudin, M. N. B. H., Fauzee, O. S. M., Jamalis, M., Geok, K. S., & Din, A. (2009). Coaching leadership styles and athlete satisfaction among Malaysian University Basketball team. Research journal of international studies, 9(1), 4-11.
Pilus, A. H. M., & Saadan, R. (2009). Coaching leadership styles and athlete satisfactions among hockey team. Journal of Human Capital Development, 2(1), 77-87.
Rodriguez, F. M. (2009). Perceived leadership in swimming: Leadership styles of NCAA swim coaches and its relationships with athlete satisfaction, turnover intention, and commitment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).
Santos, F., Gould, D., & Strachan, L. (2019). Research on positive youth development-focused coach education programs: Future pathways and applications. International Sport Coaching Journal, 6(1), 132-138.
Sarpira M., Khodayari A., Mohammadi S. (2012). The relationship between leadership coaching style and team cohesion in team and individual sports. Aust J Basic Appl Sci; 6: 297–302.
Surujlal, J., & Dhurup, M. (2012). Athlete preference of coach’s leadership style. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance, 18(1), 111-121.
Vaughan, R. (2015). Measuring Leadership in Sports Coaching. In I. O’Boyle, D. Murray and P. Cummins (Eds). Leadership in Sports (1st ed., pp. 223- 239). Routledge.
Vella, S. A., Oades, L. G., & Crowe, T. P. (2013). The relationship between coach leadership, the coach–athlete relationship, team success, and the positive developmental experiences of adolescent soccer players. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 18(5), 549-561.
Descàrregues
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


