THE EDUCATIONAL SERIOUS GAME AS A TOOL FOR MEASURING CONCENTRATION AMONG STUDENTS PRACTICING TABLE TENNIS: THE CASE OF THE FLOW GAMES IN INFORMAL UNIVERSITY SETTINGS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v12i2.5797Keywords:
concentration, Flow-Game, serious game, table tennisAbstract
The problem of concentration is an objective issue, especially at the beginning of the 21st century, given the evolution of lifestyles and the digital revolution, so an unusual flow of information bombards human beings. This impacts all aspects of life, especially student life. This study aimed to research the educational serious game as a tool to measure concentration in students practicing table tennis: the case of flow games in informal university settings. A total of 21 students from different state universities, aged between 19 and 26, participated in a table tennis session. The students were divided into groups of 4 players for each game session that lasted between 3 min and 5 min. A concentration assessment test called "Flow-Game" was administered before the intervention (t0), immediately after each session (t1). This test is in the form of an electronic labyrinth. The results showed an average relative learning gain of less than 40% for the majority of students. In addition, the results showed that female students achieved significantly higher results than male students. These results suggest that the practice of table tennis and the calculation of concentration through serious game "Flow-Game" in the university environment in a formal education setting can be an effective medium and long term.
Article visualizations:
References
Alvarez, J., & Djaouti, D. (2008). An Introduction to Serious Games. Rapport Technique, CNRS-Lab. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308254271_An_introduction_to_Serious_Game_Definitions_and_Concepts
Botella, C., Serrano, B., Baños, R. M., & Garcia-Palacios, A. (2011). Virtual reality exposure-based therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of its efficacy, the adequacy of the treatment protocol, and its acceptability. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 7, 249-259. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S19677
Brown, R. (2019). Technology in education: Challenges and opportunities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119239086
Fédération Française de Tennis de Table. (2022). Règlement Sportif 2022. Disponible à l'adresse suivante. Retrieved from https://www.fftt.com/site/medias/shares_files/reglements-sportifs-2022-v3-applicables-1er-juillet-2022-4050.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Gerrard, D. (2003). Leadership and management in schools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2012). Learning, attentional control, and action video games. Current Biology, 22(6), R197-R206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.012
Hainaut, J. (1975). Méthodologie et évaluation en éducation. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Johnson, A., & Miller, B. (2017). The foundations of modern learning theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Ouellet, C. (1985). Les bases de la pédagogie moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Retrieved from http://remisis.dsi.univ-paris-diderot.fr/base/format_liste.php?lang=fr&onglet=0&link=O&format=long&sort=DATE%20DESC&Chp1=OUELLET%2C+F
Pham, Q., Wiljer, D., & Cafazzo, J. A. (2016). Beyond the randomized controlled trial: A review of alternatives in mHealth clinical trial methods. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(3), e107. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5720
Renaud, M. (2018). L’apprentissage collaboratif dans les écoles francophones. Montréal, QC: Les Éditions de l'Éducation.
Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., & Marquis, J. S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 247-256. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.3.247
Sawyer, B., & Smith, P. (2008). Serious games taxonomy. Serious Games Initiative.Retrieved from https://thedigitalentertainmentalliance.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/serious-games-taxonomy.pdf
Smith, T., & Jones, K. (2018). Assessment methods in education: A practical guide. London: Routledge.
White, P., Smith, J., & Roberts, L. (2020). Effective strategies for collaborative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


