CANDIDATES TEACHERS' CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT SELF-EFFICACY LEVELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.130Keywords:
Student teacher, self-efficacy, pedagogical formation certificate programAbstract
This research aimed to determine the classroom management self-efficacy beliefs of students have been studying in Faculty of Education and students have been maintaining pedagogical formation certificate program. It employed survey model. The study group was composed of 362 trainees who attended to pedagogical formation certificate program in Duzce University in 2015/16 academic year spring term and 255 sophomores, junior and senior class students in Classroom Teaching and Science Teaching Departments in Duzce University Faculty of Education in 2015/16 academic year. In the study, it was aimed to reach the whole population and a scale was implemented instead of sampling. The research was conducted with 410 returning scales. “Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale” was conducted in order to determine the classroom management self-efficacy perceptions of the student teachers. Since the data were not normally distributed, Mann-Whitney U Test which is a nonparametric test. The following results were obtained: Classroom management self-efficacy perceptions of the students who have been studying in Faculty of Education and students who have been attending the pedagogical formation certificate program are high in terms of “Providing the student participation”, “Utilization of Teaching Strategies” and “Classroom management”. The difference between the classroom management self-efficacy perception averages of the two groups was not statistically meaningful. Also, there was no statistically meaningful difference between the students who have been studying in Faculty of Education and students who have been attending the pedagogical formation certificate program in terms of gender variable.
Article visualizations:
References
Acat, B. (2006). Yenilenen ilköğretim müfredatı. okul yönetimlerini geliştirme programı, Ankara: İlköğretim Genel Müdürlüğü.
Aydın, D. (2013), Sosyal öğrenme kuramı, eğitim psikolojisi (Editör: M. Engin Deniz). Maya Akademi, 5. Baskı. 323-324.
Aydın, M. (1991). Eğitim yönetimi, 3. Baskı, Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayınevi.
Babadoğan, C. (2006). Bir insan (öğretmen) olarak müdür. okul yönetimlerini geliştirme programı, Ankara: İlköğretim Genel Müdürlüğü.
Bandura, A. (1980). Slef-referent thought: the development of self-efficacy. J. Flavell and L.D. Ross (Eds). Cognitive Social Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social fonundations of thought and action. englewood cliffs, Nj: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceided self-efficancy in cognitive development and functioning. Educatioanal Psyhologisti, 117-48.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficancy: the exercise of control, New York: Freeeman.
Başar, H. (1999). Sınıf yönetimi, Ankara: MEB Yayınları.
Borich, G., D. (2014). Etkili öğretim yöntemleri. 8 Baskı. (Çeviri Editörü: Bahaddin ACAT). Ankara, Nobel Yayınları.
Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1994). Okul yöneiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.
Celep, C. (2000), Sınıf yönetimi ve disiplin, Ankara: Anı Yayınları.
Eisenberger, J. (2005). Self-eficacy: Raising the bar for all students. Larchomont, NY: Eye on Education.
Erdoğan, İ. (2000). Sınıf yönetimi, İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
Gist, M., E ve Mitchell, T., R. (1992). Self- efficacy: a theoretical aznalysis of ıts determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17 (2), 183-211.
Hoy, Wayne K. ve Miskel, G. Cecil (2012). Educational administration, theory, research and practice, (Çeviri Editörü: Selahattin Turan) Ankara, Nobel Yayınları 7. Baskı.
Jeanne Ellis, Ormrod (2014). Human learning/ öğrenme psikolojisi. (Çeviri Editörlüğü Mustafa BALOĞLU). Ankara, Nobel Yayınları 6. Baskı
Karasar N. (2002). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Kaya, Z. (2006). Öğreti̇m teknoloji̇leri̇ ve materyal geli̇şti̇rme. Ankara: Pegem A. Yayıncılık.
Korkmaz. S.(2006). Sosyal öğrenme kuramı, eğitim psikolojisi, (Editör: Binnur Yeşilyaprak). Pegem A yayıncılık 3. Baskı.
Korkut, K. (2009). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öz-yeterlik inançları ile sınıf yönetimi beceri algıları arasındaki ilişki. Burdur: Mehmet Akif Ersoy Ünv. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi)
Özdemir, S. Yalın, İ., Sezgin, F. (2004). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş. Ankara: Pegem A. Yayıncılık.
Özden, Y.(2006). Eğitimde dönüşüm: eğitimde yeni değerler.(6. Baskı) Ankara: Pegem A. Yayıncılık.
Robbins S., P. ve Judge, T. A ( 2012). Örgütsel davranış, (Çeviri Editörü: İnci Erdem) Ankara, Nobel Yayınları 14. Baskı.
Robbins, S., P. Decenzo, D., A, Coulter, M. (2013). Fundamentals of management (Çeviri Editörü: Adem Öğür) Ankara, Nobel Yayınları 13. Baskı.280-281.
Senemoğlu, N. (1997). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim. H:Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü yayınları. 235-242.
Slavin, E. R. (2013). Eğitim psikolojisi (Çeviri Editörü: Galip Yüksel) Ankara, Nobel Yayınları 10. Baskı. 115-137
Taşdemir, M. (2000). Eğitimde planlama ve değerlendirme. Ankara Ocak Yayınları.
Tchannen-Moran, M ve Woolfolf-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 202-248.
Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Educational psychology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
