SCHÈMES ET TRAJECTOIRES POUR LA FORMATION DES ENSEIGNANTS DES SCIENCES / FORMS AND TRAJECTORIES FOR THE TRAINING OF THE SCIENCE TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1519Keywords:
dispositifs de formation des enseignants, didactique des sciences / teacher training forms, science educationAbstract
Cet article aborde un certain nombre de questions de formation des enseignants des sciences physiques et chimiques et les sciences de la vie et de la Terre. Pendant trente ans une série des questions se posent sur le problème du contenu, des pratiques et de professionnalisation de la formation des enseignants. Au centre de ces discussions a été toujours la question des modèles organisationnels de cette formation. Dans le texte quatre modèles de formation des enseignants sont présentés et leurs dimensions théoriques et empiriques sont discutées.
This article addresses a number of issues of training teachers of the physical and chemical sciences and the sciences of life and the Earth. For thirty years, a series of questions arise on the problem of content, practices and professionalizing the training of teachers. At the center of these discussions has always been the issue of organizational models of this training. In the text, four models of teacher training are presented and their theoretical and empirical dimensions are discussed.
Article visualizations:
References
Albero, B. (2010). La formation en tant que dispositif : du terme au concept. In B. Charlier & F. Henri (Dir.), La technologie de l’éducation : recherches, pratiques et perspectives (pp. 47-59). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Anthopoulou, V., & Ravanis, K. (2016). How do we see when the light is not “enough”? Mental representations of pre-service preschool teachers. International Education and Research Journal, 2(8), 30-32.
Appleton, K. (2005). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 31-54). Abingdon: Routledge.
Arun, Z. (2017). Formation des enseignants et recherche en didactique des sciences. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 206-216.
Arun, Z. (2018). Questions sur la formation initiale des enseignants en didactique des sciences: une vision alternative. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 3(1), 44-53.
Berry, A. & Van Driel, J. H. (2012). Teaching About Teaching Science: Aims, Strategies, and Backgrounds of Science Teacher Educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 117-128.
Brousseau G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 39-115.
Castro, D., & Rodriguez, J. (2014). 8-9 year old pupils' mental representations of light: teaching perspectives. Journal of Advances in Natural Sciences, 2(1), 40-44.
Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Conne, F. (1992). Savoir et connaissance dans la perspective de la transposition didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12(2/3), 221-270.
García-Barros, S., & González-Rodríguez, C. (2017). La energía en el proceso de la erosión. Una experiencia para la formación de maestros. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(1), 144-161.
Grigorovitch, A. (2014). Children’s misconceptions and conceptual change in Physics Education: the concept of light. Journal of Advances in Natural Sciences, 1(1), 34-39.
Johsua, S., & Dupin, J.-J. (1993). Introduction à la didactique des sciences et des mathématiques. Paris: PUF.
Kampeza, M., & Ravanis, K. (2012). Children’s understanding of the earth’s shape: an instructional approach in early education. Skholê, 17, 115-120.
Kansanen, P. (2005). The idea of research-based teacher education. In E. Eckert & W. Fichten (Eds), Schulbegleitforschung. Erwartungen – Ergebnisse – Wirkungen (pp. 91-103). Munster: Waxmann.
Lee Bae, C., Hayes, K. N., Seitz, J., O’Connor, D., & DiStefano, R. (2016). A coding tool for examining the substance of teacher professional learning and change with example cases from middle school science lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 164-178.
Lemeignan, G. & Weil-Barais, A. (1993). Construire des concepts en Physique. Paris: Hachette.
Letor, C., & Périsset Bagnoud, D. (2010). Travailler ensemble entre logiques professionnelles, organisationnelles et institutionnelles : Un développement professionnel sous contraintes. In L. Corriveau et al., (dir.), Travailler ensemble dans les établissements scolaires et de formation (pp. 165-173). Bruxelles : De Boeck.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
McPhee, A. D., & Humes, W. (1998). Teacher Education and teacher development: a comparative study. Teacher Development, 2(2), 165-178.
Mialaret, G. (1977). La formation des enseignants. Paris : PUF.
Nertivich, D. (2016). Représentations des élevés de 11-12 ans pour la formation des ombres et changement conceptuel. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 3(2), 103-107.
Ntalakoura, V., & Ravanis, K. (2014). Changing preschool children’s representations of light: a scratch based teaching approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 191-200.
Ntoi, V., & Lefoka, J. P. (2002). NTTC under the microscope: problems of change in primary teacher education in Lesotho. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 275-289.
Papamichaël, Y., & Ravanis, K. (1993). La compréhension de la notion du champ magnétique par les enseignants en formation de l’école primaire. Revue de Recherches en Éducation: Spirale, 10/11, 249-262.
Paquay, L. (2006). Évaluer l’activité enseignante. In G. Figari & L. Mottier Lopez (dir.), Recherche sur l’évaluation en éducation (pp. 51-58). Paris : L’Harmattan.
Park, S., & Oliver, S. J. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261–284.
Pecheone, R. L., & Chung, R. R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education. The performance assessment for California teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22-36.
Périsset, D. (2010). Le double enjeu de la formation à l’expertise professionnelle. Recherche et Formation, 65, 61-74.
Pollard, A. (2002). Reflective teaching: effective and evidence informed professional practice: London: Continuum.
Postic, M. (1977). Observation objective des comportements des enseignants. Paris: PUF.
Ravanis, K. (2005). Les Sciences Physiques à l’école maternelle: éléments théoriques d’un cadre sociocognitif pour la construction des connaissances et/ou le développement des activités didactiques. International Review of Education, 51(2/3), 201-218.
Ravanis, K. (2010). Représentations, Modèles Précurseurs, Objectifs-Obstacles et Médiation-Tutelle : concepts-clés pour la construction des connaissances du monde physique à l’âge de 5-7 ans. Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Educación en Ciencias, 5(2), 1-11.
Ravanis, K. (2012). Représentations des enfants de 10 ans sur le concept de lumière : perspectives piagétiennes. Schème - Revista Eletrônica de Psicologia e Epistemologia Genéticas, 4(1), 70-84.
Rigaut, M. (2005). L’épreuve écrite de physique au baccalauréat: analyse du point de vue du contrat didactique. Thèse de doctorat, France, Université Paris 7 – Denis Diderot.
Rodriguez, J., & Castro, D. (2016). Changing 8-9 year-old pupil’s mental representations of light: a metaphor based teaching approach. Asian Education Studies, 1(1), 40-46.
Rozenszaijn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014). Expansion of biology teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) during a long-term professional development program. Research in Science Education, 44, 189–213.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Sotirova, E.-M. (2017). L’apprentissage en sciences expérimentales : la recherche et l’enseignement. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(12), 188-198.
Vellopoulou, A., & Ravanis, K. (2012). From the formal curriculum to the lesson planning: the didactic transposition kindergarten teachers’ carry out as they plan to teach dissolution. Skholê, 17, 71-76.
Weil-Barais, A. (1985). L’étude des connaissances des élèves comme préalable à l’action didactique. Bulletin de Psychologie, 368, 157-160.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
