AN EXPLORATION OF THE PARATAXIC BEHAVIOUR AND IMPLICATIONS OF HOLE-IN-THE-WALLET PHENOMENON AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN KENYA

Authors

  • Susan M. Macharia Dr., Mount Kenya University, School of Education, P. O. Box 342-01000, Thika, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1685

Keywords:

spending, betting unrealistic expectations, non-academic activities, peer interactions, financial difficulties

Abstract

Students in Kenyan Universities receive some form of pocket money for academic and non-academic endeavours. However, there exists a knowledge gap in relation to how this money is utilized particularly for non-academic activities. This Paper reports findings of a study done among Kenyan University students to explore how they used pocket money for non-academic activities and how this impacted on their unending quest for success in betting activities The study was guided by the theory of interpersonal interaction advanced by Harry Stack Sullivan (1950). The study employed two research designs; survey and ex post facto. The survey design was deemed appropriate because it enabled the researcher to describe the parataxic experiences of male and female students in the sample and generalize them to the larger group from which the sample was drawn. The ex post facto design was appropriate because the effects of the variables had already occurred and thus not manipulable. The study targeted male and female students pursuing different areas of training on full time basis in selected private and public Universities in Kenya. The sample was drawn using stratified random sampling. The questionnaire comprising Likert type items was the main research tool. Validity was established by expert judgement while reliability was sought by use of the split-half technique. The study found that peers introduced university students to betting activities based on unrealistic expectations of making quick money. The quest for quick money pushed the students to various betting activities and more males than females gambled away college fees leading to the hole-in the wallet phenomenon. The study established that university students experienced varied internal conflicts which could be attributed to betting. The study recommends an establishment of a support system to engage university students in socially acceptable ways for enhanced individual wellbeing so that they can reap the maximum benefits of learning.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Al-Barashdi, H. S., Bouazza, A. & Jabur, N. H. (2015) Smartphone addiction among university undergraduates: A Literature review. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 4 (3) 210-225.

Corney, R., & Davis, J. (2010). The attractions and risks of internet gambling for women: A qualitative study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 121–139.

Enewereuzor, I. K., Ugwu, L. I. & Ugwi, D. I. (2016). Role of smartphone addiction in gambling passion and school work engagement: A dualistic model of passion approach. Asian journal of gambling issues and public health

Gainsbury S. M., Hing N., Delfabbro P. H., & King D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. International Gambling Studies, 14(2), 196–213

Gainsbury S. M., Russell A., & Blaszczynski A. (2012). Are psychology university student gamblers representative of non‐university students and general gamblers? A comparative analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(1), 11–25.

James, R.J. E, O’Malley, C & Tunney, R. J. (2017). Understanding the psychology of mobile gambling: A behavioural synthesis. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3): 608–625.

Koross, R. (2016) University students gambling: Examining the effects of betting on Kenyan University students’ behavior. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 4, (8), 57-67

Macharia, S. M. (2013) Fundamentals of school guidance and counselling. Lambert.

Ryalu, N. & Oei, T. P. S. (2004) The gambling related cognitions scale (GRCS) development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, (99), 757-769

Sammut, M. (2010). The Prevalence of Gambling among University Students: With a Focus on Internet Gambling. Unpublished Thesis Faculty of Education the University of Malta.

Seifert, C. A., & Wulfert, E. (2011) The effects of realistic rewards and risk on simulated gambling behavior. The American Journal of Addictions, 20, (2) 120-126

Steele, H. & Steele, M. (2005). Understanding and resolving emotional conflict: The London parent-child project. In K.E. Grossmann and K. Grossmann (Eds.), Attachment from Infancy to Adulthood. (pp.137-163). New York: Guilford Press.

Stuhldreher, W., L. & Stuhldreher, T. J. (2007). Gambling as an Emerging Health Problem on Campus Journal of American college Health 56(1) 78-88

Wardle, H., Moody, A., Griffiths, M. D., Orford, J., & Volberg, R. (2011a). Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: Evidence from the British gambling prevalence survey 2010. International Gambling Studies, 11, 339–356.

Wenzel, H., & Dahl, A. (2008). Female pathological gamblers: A critical review of the clinical findings. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 190–202.

Weinstock, J., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., & Watson, J. M. (2007). Gambling behavior of student-athletes and a student cohort: what are the odds? Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 13-24

Downloads

Published

2018-05-28

Issue

Section

Articles