THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY TEACHING MATERIALS BASED ON GROUP INVESTIGATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2053Keywords:
teaching material, biochemistry, group investigation, 4-D modelAbstract
Biochemistry is one of the required course in biology education department, Universitas Sulawesi Barat. However, in this course, there is not yet available teaching materials that help students to make scientific skills. Therefore, the authors felt attracted to develop a valid biochemistry teaching materials based on Group Investigation (GI). The type of this study is R&D, adapting 4-D (define, design, develop, and disseminate) model has been developed by Thiagarajan. The developed teaching materials, consisting of the lesson plan, assessment instruments (affective, cognitive, psychomotor), and biochemistry textbook. To view the validity of teaching materials, we used the validation sheets instrument. The teaching materials in this study were validated by the content expert, teaching materials expert, instructional design expert, and biochemistry lecturer. Validation results showed the average percentage of assessment by content expert is 83% (valid); teaching materials expert is 82% (valid); instructional design expert is 80% (valid); and biochemistry lecturer is 84% (valid). Furthermore, the results of testing readability of small groups consisting of 21 students who have different academic ability (high, middle, and low) showed the average percentage of assessment is 83% (valid). The product has good quality and the potential to implement in biochemistry class.
Article visualizations:
References
Arnold, N., 2013. The Role of Methods Textbooks in Providing Early Training for Teaching with Technology in the Language Classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 46(2), 230-245.
Asyari, M., Al Muhdar, M. H. I., Susilo, H., and Ibrohim., 2017. Improving Critical Thinking Skills through the Integration of Problem Based Learning and Group Investigation. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(1), 36–44.
Barrouillet, P., 2015. Theories of Cognitive Development: From Piaget to Today. Developmental Review, 38, 1-12.
Bianchini, J. A., and Kelly, G. J., 2003. Challenges of Standards-Based Reform: The Example of California’s Science Content Standards and Textbook Adoption Process. Science Education, 87, 378–389.
Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong, N., and Hallar, B., 2009. Effects of Inquiry- Based Learning on Students Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1-22.
Chingos, M. M., and Whitehurst, G. J., 2012. Choosing Blindly: Instructional Materials, Teacher Effectiveness, and the Common Core. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution
Cigrik, E., and Ozkan, M., 2015. The Investigation of The Effect of Visiting Science Center on Scientific Process Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1312–1316.
Danial, M., Sawal, M., and Nurlaela., 2018. Development of Chemistry Instructional Tools and Its Effect on Critical Thinking Skills, Metacognition, and Concept Mastery of Students. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1028, 1–8.
Donnelly, L. A., and Boone, W. J., 2007. Biology Teachers’ Attitudes Toward and Use of Indiana’s Evolution Standards. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 44(2), 236– 257.
Errington, A., and Litic, D. B., 2015. Management by Textbook: The Role of Textbooks in Developing Critical Thinking. Journal of Management Education, 39(6), 774-800.
Fausan, M. M., and Pujiastuti, I. P., 2017. Pengaruh pendekatan CTL berbasis NHT terhadap motivasi hasil belajar IPA dan retensi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(2), 133–140.
Hamilton, R. L., and Swortzel, K. A., 2007. Assessing Mississippi AEST teachers’ capacity for teaching science integrated process skills. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 57(1), 1-22.
Horton, H. R., Moran, L. A., Scrimgeour, K. G., Perry, M. D., and Rawn, J. D., 2006. Principles of Biochemistry. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Johnson, R. B., and Christensen, L., 2014. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. California: SAGE Publications.
Jolliffe, W., 2007. Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: Putting it into Practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Kaya, V. H., Bahceci, D., and Altuk, Y. G., 2012. The Relationship between Primary School Students’ Scientific Literacy Levels and Scientific Process Skills. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 495–500.
Lau, K. H., Lam, T., Kam, B. H., Nkhoma, M., Richardson, J., and Thomas, S., 2018. The Role of Textbook Learning Resources in e-Learning: A Taxonomic Study. Computers & Education, 118, 10-24.
Listiana, L., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., and Suarsini, E., 2016. Empowering Students’ Metacognitive Skills through New Teaching Strategy (Group Investigation Integrated with Think Talk Write) in Biology Classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 391–400.
Mitchell, M. G., Montgomery, H., Holder, M., and Stuart, D., 2008. Group Investigation as a Cooperative Learning Strategy. Journal of Educational Research, 54(4), 388–395.
Nie, B., Freedman, T., Hwang, S., Wang, N., Moyer, J. C., and Cai, J., 2013. An Investigation of Teachers’ Intentions and Reflections about Using Standards- Based and Traditional Textbooks in the Classroom. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5), 699–711.
Nieveen, N., Akker, D. V. J., Branch, M. R., Gustafson, K., and Plompt, T., 1999. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ozdemir K., and Presley, A., 2007. The effect of Creative and Critical Thinking Based Laboratory Applications on Academic Achievement and Science Process Skills. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 377-389.
Paik, S., 2015. Teachers’ Attention to Curriculum Materials and Student Contexts: The Case of Korean Middle School Teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 235–246.
Palennari, M., 2016. Exploring the Correlation between Metacognition and Cognitive Retention of Students using some Biology Teaching Strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 617-629.
Prastowo, A., 2013. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif: Menciptakan Metode Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., and Ramli, M., 2017. Closing the Science Process Skills Gap between Students with High and Low Level Academic Achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266-277.
Sangadji, S., 2016. Implementation of Cooperative Learning with Group Investigation Model to Improve Learning Achievement of Vocational School Students in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning & Development, 6(1), 91– 103.
Silay, I., and Celik, P., 2013. Evaluation of Scientific Process Skill of Teacher Candidates. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1122–1130.
Stern, L., and Ahlgren, A., 2002. Analysis of Students’ Assessments in Middle School Curriculum Materials: Aiming Precisely at Benchmarks and Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 889–910.
Sudarma, I. K., 2006. Pengembangan Paket Pembelajaran dengan Model Dick & Carey Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Media Pendidikan II Program S1 Teknologi Pendidikan IKIP Negeri Singaraja. Unpublished magister’s thesis: Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.
Sugiyono., 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syamsuri, B. S, Anwar, S and Sumarna, O., 2017. Development of Teaching Material Oxidation-Reduction Reactions through Four Steps Teaching Material Development (4S TMD). Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 895.
Tan, O. S., 2003. Problem Based Learning Innovation. Using Problem to Power Learning in the 21st Century. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte. Ltd.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., and Semmel, M. I., 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
