THE USE OF PORTFOLIO INSTRUMENTS TO ASSESS SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS OF STUDENTS IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2215Keywords:
assessment, portfolio, science process skillsAbstract
Permendikbud Number 104 of 2014 emphasizes that the National Curriculum use authentic judgments which prioritize not only the assessment at the end of learning but also the assessment of processes during learning. The 2013 curriculum encourages the use of portfolios made by students as the main instrument of assessment. Teachers in general are familiar with portfolio assessment, but there are difficulties in applying and adjusting it to the demands of the 2013 curriculum. Science process skills that are in line with the scientific approach in the 2013 curriculum have not been the focus of many goals in learning activities. This study attempts to use portfolio assessment to assess students' science process skills which are declared valid, practical, and effective in the concept of classification of living things. The design used to develop the device is the Tessmer design with the research sample being VII grade students at Al Mazaya Islamic Middle School in Banjarmasin. The sample used in the one-to-one evaluation phase consists of five respondents from teachers and students. The stage of the small group evaluation consists of one teacher and six students, and the stage of the field test was conducted in two classes, each of which had twenty-five students. The portfolio assessment focuses on the topic of classification of living things. The results of the study indicate the achievement of learning activities based on the activities of teachers and students and the effectiveness of achieving learning objectives. The results of the study show that portfolio assessment of the concept of classification of living things can assess and train students' science process skills, even though the overall value has not received maximum results.
Article visualizations:
References
Akker, Jan van den. 2007. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. London: Routledge.
Akker, Jan van den. Principle and Methodes of Development Research in J.V.D Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustalfon, N. Nieveen ang T.J. Plomp (Ed), Design Methodology and Development Research. Dordrecht, Kluwer. (1999).
Astina, Yuliati. 2017. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Topik Sistem Organisasi Kehidupan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (GI) untuk melatihkan keterampilan Proses Sains dan Self Efficacy Peserta Didik. Tesis. Banjarmasin. Program Studi Magister Keguruan IPA-ULM.
Birgin, Osman and Baki, Adnan. 2007. The Use of Portofolio to Assess Student’s Performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education Vol.4, Issue 2. (http://www.tused.org) diakses 25 Desember 2017.
Damiani, Victoria B. 2004. Portfolio Assessment in the Classroom. Bethesda. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum. 2004. Pedoman Pengembangan Portofolio untuk Penilaian. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Keeler, Carolyn M. 2097. Portfolio Assessment in Graduate Level Statistics Courses. ISBN 905199 333 1. Copyright holder: International Statistical Institute.
Kemendikbud. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 81 A, Tahun 2013, Tentang Implementasi Kurikulum.
Kunandar. 2013. Penilaian autentik, Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Perkasa.
Lucas, Rochelle Irene G. A Study on Portfolio Assessment as an Effective Student Self- Evaluation Scheme. Vol 16 No.1. De La Salle University-Manila. Philippines: The Asia Pacific Educational Researcher. http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/journals/taper/pdf/200706/lucasnew.pdf
Marhaeni, A.A.I.N. 2005. Pengaruh Asesmen Portofolio dan Motivasi Berprestasi dalam Belajar Bahasa Inggris Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Bahasa Inggris (Studi Eksperimen pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP Negeri Singaraja, 2004). IKIP Negeri Jakarta.
O’Malley, J.M. & S. Moya. 1994. A Portfolio Assessment Model For ESL. New York: Addison-The Journal of Educational Issue of Language Minority Students, v13 p.13-36, Spring.
Permendikbud 2014.Regulations minister education and culture number 104 of 2014 About A ssessment Results Learn By Educator On Education Basic and Education Middle. Depdikbud: Jakarta.
Minister of Education and Culture. 2014. Regulations minister education and culture number 104 of 2014 About
Assessement Results Learn By Educator On Education Basic and Education Middle class. Ministry of Education and Culture: Jakarta.
Saida, Indriwati. 2013. Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMA Brawijaya Smart School Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang. Vol.1 No.1.
Saputra, Hendry J. 2012. Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Melalui Keterampilan Kerja Ilmiah Untuk Mengembangkan Nilai Karakter. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pembelajaran FPMIPA IKIP PGRI Semarang.
Tessmer, Martin. (1993) Planning and Conducting – Formative Evaluations. London, Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Williams, and friends. (2005). Portfolio Assessment: A Guide for Teachers and administrators. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal. Vol.23 Number 4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


