DANISH GOOD PRACTICES FOR COMBATTING EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING: A CASE STUDY FROM COPENHAGEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2286Keywords:
early school leaving, flexible policy environment and education system, social inclusion, comprehensive measures, alternative arenas, individual study pathwaysAbstract
This study focuses on comprehensive measures related to Early School Leaving (ESL) and on effective institutions in the Danish Education System, more particularly, on the everyday practices of the Youth Guidance Centre of Copenhagen (hereafter YGCC) and the Copenhagen Youth School System (hereafter CYSS) by giving voices to participants who work and study there. The research also points out the main role of CYSS in promoting school attendance through the lense of dropouts/at-risk students. For the qualitative inquiry, empirical data were collected from observations conducted in CYSS; a total of 18 interviews with former students; and a total of 20 interviews with a range of stakeholders including policy makers, school management, teachers and guidance counsellors. The qualitative research described herein had the potential to be more sensitive to the micro-processes of students’ experiences in education in order to get a deeper insight into the characteristics of the Danish institutional network that adapts flexibly to the needs of students and of a local community.
Article visualizations:
References
Brynaa, K. & Johansen, L. (2010). Combating early school leaving: You become an idiot not doing anything. E2C-Europe Annual Survey 2010.. E2C Secretarial Office, Herlen
Brynaa (2010). Transition from lower secondary education to upper secondary education. Presentation.
Cedefop. (2015). Tackling early leaving from education and training in Europe: Strategies, policies and measures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Cresson, E., Dujardin, C., & Jospin, O. (1995). Second chance schools. European Employment Observatory.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DfL (2015). Den frie Laererskole. N.S.F. Grundtvig og Kristen Kold.
Retrieved from: http://www.dfl-ollerup.dk/grundtvig-og-kold
EC (2001). European Communities. Second Chance Schools. The Results of a European Pilot Project.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Lafond, L. & Tersmette, E. (1999). Second Cahnce Schools. Guide for setting up a Second Chance School. European Commission- Education and Culture. Brussels.
Madsen, P. K. (2010). EEO Review: Youth Employment Measures, Denmark. Centre for Labour Market Research (CARMA), University of Aarlborg.
OECD (2012) The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Plant, P. (2009). Fæste. Dansk uddannelses- og erhvervsvejledning, 1886-2009. [Hold.Danish educational and vocational guidance, 1886-2009].Fredensborg: Studie og Erhverv
Plant,P. (2010).Vejledningsret – vejledningspligt [Guidance right – guidance obligation]. Vejlederforum Magasinet, 1–3.
Plant, P. & Thomsen, R. (2011). Career guidance in Denmark: Social control in a velvet glove. Orientacion y Sociedad, (11), 1–17.
Plant, P. (2013). Individual careers: Individual learning and guidance. Educational and Vocational Guidance Bulletin, (64).
Schmitsek, S. (2010). If you miss it you miss out: Springboard (Dobbantó) Programme, one possible way of social and educational integration for students at the risk of drop-out. E2C Annual Survey 2010.E2C Secretarial Office, Herlen.
TWG (2013). Thematic Working Group on Early School Leaving. Reducing early school leaving: Key messages and policy support. Brussels: European Commission.
UVM (2015). The Danish Ministry of Education. Overview of the Danish Education System. Denmark. Retrieved from http://eng.uvm.dk/Education/Overview-of-the-Danish- Education-System.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


