THE EFFECT OF MATHEMATIZATION ACTIVITIES PERFORMED IN THE INFORMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS ON THE OPINIONS OF GIFTED STUDENTS ON MATHEMATICS DISCIPLINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2348Keywords:
gifted/special talented student, mathematization, informal learning, nature of science, interdisciplinary teachingAbstract
The main purpose of this research is to create an educational environment including real mathematical problems that can be solved through the interdisciplinary approach and inductive methods and to examine the change brought about by this environment in terms of the opinions and perspectives of special talented students related to the mathematics discipline. The study was conducted in Kayseri Province through the project “Mathematics Energising in Nature and Structures” supported within the context of Nature Education and Science Schools Support Program of Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (STRCT). The study group of this research is composed of 35 special talented students (22 males, 13 females) going on the project education at 9th and 10th grade in the science and art centre (SAC) in Ankara province during 2017-2018 academic year. In this study, the case study method, one of the qualitative research approaches, was used so as to examine the opinions of the students before and after the project process. Pre-interview through the semi-structured interview form before the project period and post-interview after the project period were conducted to the students in the study, and the data obtained about how the students were affected by the case were analysed. Upon the practice, it was determined that there were some findings indicating that it enabled the students to associate mathematics with the other disciplines and real life. It was concluded that the scientific activities carried out in informal learning environments significantly increased the attitudes of the students attending the science camp towards the science after the practice when compared to case before the practice, and that these activities also brought about positive changes in the perspectives of the students on science, scientific knowledge, and scientific environments.
Article visualizations:
References
Adam, J. (2003). Mathematics in nature: Modeling patterns in the natural world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Bahadir E., Hırdıç K. (2018). "Matematik müzesinde yürütülen öğrenme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin matematikleştirme sürecine katkıları ve uygulama hakkında öğrenci görüşleri", Turkish Studies, vol.13, pp.151-172.
Balkan Kıyıcı, F. & Atabek Yiğit, E. (2010). Science education beyond the classroom: A field trip to wind power plant. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(1), 225-243.
Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (3. bs.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Carr, M. ve Alexander, J. (1996). Where gifted children do and do nor excel on metacognitive tasks. Roeper Review, 18(3), 212–218.
Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: developing the potential of children at home and at school. Upper Saddle River: NJ: Prentice.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2. Baskı). USA: SAGE Publications.
Çığrık, E. (2016). Bir Öğrenme Ortamı Olarak Bilim Merkezleri. İnformal Ortamlarda Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1 (1), 79-97. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/jrinen/issue/26875/267108
Davaslıgil, Ü. (2004). Erken çoçuklukta üstün zekâlı çocuklara uygulanacak farklılaştırılmış eğitim programı. Şirin, M.R., Kulaksızoğlu A., Bilgili, A.E. (Ed.), I. Türkiye Üstün Yenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Seçilmiş Makaleler Kitabı içinde (s. 289-300). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı.
Davidson, J. E. (2012). Is giftedness truly a gift? Gifted Education International, 28(3), 252–266.
Demirel, Ö., Tuncel, İ., Demirhan, C. ve Demir, K. (2008). Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı ile Disiplinlerarası Yaklaşımı Temel Alan Uygulamalara İlişkin Öğretmen-Öğrenci Görüşleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(147), 14–25.
Erten, Z , Taşçi, G . (2016). Fen Bilgisi Dersine Yönelik Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları Etkinliklerinin Geliştirilmesi Ve Öğrencilerin Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2), 638-657. DOI: 10.17556/jef.41328)
Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging In-school and Out-of-school Learning: Formal, Non-Formal, and Informal Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology,16, 171-190.
French, D. (2004). Teaching and Learning Geometry (3. bs.). London: Continuum Publishing Group.
Freudenthal, H. (2002). Revisiting Mathematics Education: China lectures (9. bs.). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Haverty, L., Koedinger, K., Klahr, D. ve Alibali, M. (2000). Solving Inductive Reasoning Problems in Mathematics : Not-so-Trivial Pursuit. Cognitive Science, 24(2), 249–298.
Hayes, B. (2007). The Development of Inductive Reasoning. A. Feeney ve E. Heit (Ed.), Inductive reasoning: Experimental, developmental, and computational approaches içinde (s. 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, T. (2018, January). Improving students’ mathematical representational ability through RME-based progressive mathematization. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 948, No. 1, p. 012038). IOP Publishing.
Hoctor, M. (2013). Identfying young gifted children. PhD Thesis. Unıversıty of Southern Calıfornıa.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Konur, B. K., Şeyihoğlu, A., Sezen, G. & Tekbıyık, A. (2011). Evaluation of a science camp: Enjoyable discovery of mysterious world. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(3), 1602-1607.
National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics. Reston, VA. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17957.x
Nesin, A. (2008). Matematik ve Doğa. İstanbul: Nesin Yayınevi.
Özkök, A. (2005). Disiplinler arası yaklaşıma dayalıyaratıcı problem çözme öğretim programının yaratıcı problem çözme becerisine etkisi. Hacettepe üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 28(28), 159-167.
Öztürk Akar, E, Ayvaz, Ü. (2018). Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Neden Bir Bilim Okulu Projesine Katılmak İster?. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 47 (Özel Sayı 1), 333-342. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/milliegitim/issue/40518/481766
Randler, C., Baumgartner, S., Eisele, H., & Kienzle, W. (2007). Learning at workstations in the zoo: A controlled evaluation of cognitive and affective outcomes. Visitor Studies, 10(2), 205-216
Sak, U. (2011). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları modeli (üyep) ve sosyal geçerliği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 213-229.
Serra, M. (2008). Discovering Geometry: An Investigative Approach. Emeryville: Key Curriculum Press.
Sheffield, L. J. (1994). The development of gifted and talented mathematics students and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards (No. 9404). DIANE Publishing.
Sontay, G., Tutar, M., Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). “Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları ile Fen Öğretimi" Hakkında Öğrenci Görüşleri: Planetaryum Gezisi. İnformal Ortamlarda Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1 (1), 1-24. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/jrinen/issue/26875/263991
Sternberg, R. J. (2009). WISC as a model of giftedness. C. A. J. S. Renzulli, Gubbins E. J., McMillen, K. S., Eckert, R. D., & Little (Ed.), Sytems & Models for developing programs for gifted & talented içinde (ss. 477–503). Waco, Texas: Pruffrock.
Şahin, E., Kabasakal, V. (2018). STEM Eğitim Yaklaşımında Dinamik Matematik Programlarının (Geogebra) Kullanımına Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (STEMES’18), 55-62. DOI: 10.18506/anemon.463877
Şahin, E. (2018). Üstün/Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin STEM Eğitim Yaklaşımına ve Bir STEM Materyali Olarak Algodoo'ya Yönelik Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(26), 259-280. doi: 10.29329/mjer.2018.172.14.
Tekbıyık, A., Şeyihoğlu, A., Sezen, V. G., & Konur, B. K. (2013). Aktif öğrenmeye dayalı bir yaz bilim kampının öğrenciler üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. The Journal Of Academic Social Studies, 6(1), 1383-1406.
Umay (2002). Gazetelerin bilmece bulmaca eklerindeki matematik. Bilişim Teknolojileri Işığında Eğitim Konferansı ve Sergisi. ODTÜ. Ankara: Semor
Umay, A. (2007). Eski Arkadaşımız Okul Matematiğin Yeni Yüzü. Ankara: Aydan Web Tesisleri.
Ülger, A. (2005). Matematiğin Kısa bir Tarihi. Bilim, Eğitim ve Düşünce Dergisi, 5(1), 1–8.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S. ve Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). İlkokul ve ortaokul matematiği: Gelişimsel yaklaşımla öğretim. (S. Durmuş, Ed.) (7. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
VanTassel-Baska, J. ve Strambaugh, T. (2012). Jacob’s ladder for grade. Waco, Texas: Pruffrock.
White, S. (2011). Designing defensible classroom programs for gifted secondary school learners–a handbook for teachers. North Shore City, New Zealand: Gifted Education Consultant.
Yıldırım, A. (1996). Disiplinlerarası öğretim kavramı ve programlar açısından doğurduğu sonuçlar. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(12).
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek. H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde nitel araştırma Yöntemleri (10. basım). Ankara, Türkiye: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yıldırım, M., Atila, M., Doğar, Ç. (2016). 6. ve 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilimleri Etkinliklerine Yönelik Düşünceleri: Küçük Bilim Adamları Keşifte Projesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (1), 194-212. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/yyuefd/issue/25853/272545
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


